Wlady, I’m not so sure I’d characterize the piece as a “loving
portrait,” if that’s what you were implying with the Montana
militiamen reference. The author did call the Angry Left
“crass.”
Still, the backhanded reference to some widespread angry right
was cheap and lazy. The author considers his Newt Gingrich
reference sufficient evidence without any actual example of a Newt
comment rising to the level of unhinged vitriol of these folks.
It’s almost as if he believes the junk the Clintons peddled after
Oklahoma City: that Rush Limbaugh was to blame. Rush, Newt, and the
mainstream right may be passionate, but their tone doesn’t approach
the Angry Left’s irrational hate.
As anecdotal as it sounds, take a look at the top blogs.
Compare the top three liberal blogs (Kos, Eschaton, and
AMERICAblog) and the top three conservative blogs (Instapundit,
Malkin, and lgf… and Power Line if you don’t count Instapundit.
I’m not sure he would). The difference in tone is night and
day.
max007 | 12.13.09 @ 1:41PM
Adidas 35TH Anniversary
adidas adicolor shoes