Okay, I am SO glad to see the Prowler's note on
the
Claude Allen case, to the effect that maybe, against what
seemed like all the evidence, Allen may actually be innocent. I
have read about Allen for a number of years of course, and had
heard nothing but great things about him. So it was that I was
absolutely delighted last Wednesday, as I was being led to a table
at a Union Station restaurant, that I saw my friend, the
incomparable
John Gizzi of Human Events and, when saying hello to
him, was introduced to Mr. Allen himself, who was dining with
Gizzi. I had never actually met Claude Allen before, but just about
the first words out of my mouth were: "I STILL think you should be
a judge!" As Gizzi reported in that column linked above, Allen
showed no signs whatsoever that any sort of boom was about to be
lowered on him. He was relaxed, cheerful, friendly, engaging -- and
that was just in the two minutes I spoke with them before moving on
to my table.
Obviously, when the news came out, just over two days later,
about Allen's arrest, I was particularly stunned because I just
couldn't imagine somebody's demeanor betraying NO hint of scandal
to come if they actually were worried about, well, what ended up
happening. I really, really, REALLY hope that the arrest was indeed
a case of mistaken identity, or something like that. I just don't
want to believe that Claude Allen could be not only so dishonest,
but also so reckless as to risk a charmed career for such petty and
despicable activities.
So here's hoping everybody takes a chill pill and waits to see
how events unfold, before jumping to conclusions. And here's hoping
that all of Allen's friends stand by him at least unless and until
the charge is proved accurate, and that the friends of his wife and
family stand behind them always and comfort them in this time of
distress.
max007| 12.11.09 @ 2:57AM
airmax 360
cheap nike shox