More from intelligencesummit.org, the Tierney translation of Saddam Hussein’s tapes recordings of meetings with his staff with regard WMD.
Following is a section that features Saddam and an unidentified male briefer. They are discussing deceiving the UN inspections process by creating a cover story.
Tierney believes this is generally a discussion of “eliminating the technical mines’ to end the inspection process. Tierney also believes the briefer is joking when he says he “wouldn’t know about the presence (of WMD).” Tierney believes Saddam’s order is to let UNSCOM confirm erroneous pre-war assessments.
I puzzle if this is a general discussion of WMD or if it is specific to one of the four sensitive areas: chemical, biological, missiles, nuclear?.
There is no date to the discussion. The references seem to suggest a time before UNSCOM was kicked out by
SH: The teams that are now searching for them are not doing so to verify the facts as they are. They are doing so to create cover through any means possible, technically, I mean, even though umawiyat, but they write it up technically.
SH: The umawiyat are many, but they write it technically, politically, on how to be dignified…this is correct…I mean they are now more angry at us than before the hostility.
SH: Before the hostility, they had information and deductions that we were working in the direction we described, a dangerous direction. Now, we can confirm for them this false direction. I mean, according to the explanation.
SH: That is, there was a group of these guys and those guys, but all ended, and with that, the thing they will confirm is our cover story. Good, this is the way it goes…they are present.
SH: there isn’t anybody that is going to give away a card…well…this is- (indistinct) attempt in any sea’a.
Unidentified male: We must study how we can package this cover story so that we can have a program that won’t cause anxiety in the future, and not work in a program that will cause anxiety again.
SH: Let them wadfu us.
Unidentified Male: Let them wadfu us (laughs) really, I mean, this issue, there is no end to it, definitely
SH: They would refuse, but they would not be able to pay (indistinct) the return is very high…not standard (laughs)…
The clue I seize upon for deeper analysis is when Saddam Hussein speaks of a time “before the hostility.” We know these tapes were made of many hundred, thousands of hours from originals: this is a best of the best of, from recordings between 1988 and at least after 2000. Therefore “before the hostility” suggests he means before the Gulf War, 1990-1991.
Saddam Hussein says “they had information and deductions that we were working in the direction we described….”
What could he be referring to? WMD in general? Unlikely, since before the Gulf War, he had used missiles and chemical weapons. There was no reason to deduce from the outside of the country:
This leaves the other two areas of inspection, the two most dangerous WMD: biological and nuclear. Saddam Hussein says, “…a dangerous direction.” This means that before the war, outsiders had knowledge, and could deduce, that
Saddam Hussein adds in a sinister fashion, “Now we can confirm for them this false direction. I mean, according to the explanation…”
I interpret this to mean that
Again, is this biological or nuclear? Both fit the pattern. At this writing, I am leaning toward nuclear, because the
The questions then center on what was
All questions to ask and ask again. There are no answers here, just gigantic puzzles. There is also very loud indication that we have not learned enough of the Iraqi WMD programs that UNSCOM never found, and that no one has accounted for to this day.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?