The Spectacle Blog

Back to Alito

By on 12.2.05 | 9:28AM

Having had their ears pinned back on Iraq by the president's speech at the Naval Academy, the Dems are oscillating back to the only other issue they care about: abortion. In this case, the cause du jour is the 17-page memo on Roe that Judge Alito wrote in 1985. Why, thunders Ted Kennedy, didn't you mention this when you answered the Judiciary Committee's questionnaire?

Alito's memo outlined a strategy to whittle away at Roe instead of attacking it head-on. Which, regardless of anyone's strategy, is the likely course of events. State after state will, as the New Hampshire parental notification law did, take pieces of the abortion issue and return it to the states' legislative processes. More and more of them are likely to be upheld by the Roberts court, and almost assuredly would were Judge Alito to become Justice Alito. Which is why the pressure on the Dems to filibuster the nomination is growing daily.

Send to Kindle

New Jobs Numbers

By on 12.2.05 | 8:59AM

The Labor Department reported this morning that American payrolls grew by 215,000 jobs and unemployment held steady at 5 percent. Today would be a great day for a good-economic-news White House PR offensive. For more on the baseless economic pessimism, see TAS economic editor Brian S. Wesbury's column in the Wall Street Journal. Daniel Henninger makes similar, though more general, points about the White House's failure to communicate effectively.

Send to Kindle

A Favorite Author

By on 12.2.05 | 8:38AM

Though two letter writers in today's Reader Mail may give you a different impression, our Tom Bethell is very widely admired. Check out Sam Karnick's gushing comments, which he's posted on his (and Jay Homnick and Hunter Baker's) excellent Reform Club site.

Send to Kindle

‘Career’ Is Code Word for Liberal Democrat

By on 12.2.05 | 7:47AM

The Washington Post has outdone itself in disingenuous reporting. Today's front page, above-the-fold headline "Justice Staff Saw Texas Districting as Illegal" is the one of the most agenda driven news stories of the year. Dan Eggen only finds news at the Justice Department when career employees complain about decisions made by their political appointee superiors. Funny, these stories never appeared when the Clintons were in the WH and Janet Reno was opening day-care centers and stopping FBI criminal agents from talking to the intelligence folks who could have clued them into terrorist plots. Why? Because the majority of "career" employees at DOJ are Democrats who agreed with the radical liberal Clinton policies and who are opposed to all things Republican/conservative. And the Civil Rights Division is the worst of the lot. It is populated with the most activist, liberal Democrats in the federal government -- acolytes and former staff of John Conyers, Henry Waxman, Pat Leahy, Ted Kennedy, etc.

Send to Kindle

Re: 390-HP Lawn Ornament Contest

By on 12.2.05 | 7:45AM

The competition has been energetic, and methinks it's gone about far enough. We'll post the finalists today for a vote. (And, no, I've NEVER had that much hair.)

Send to Kindle

IL Pharmacists Refuse to Fill Contraception Rx

By on 12.1.05 | 3:51PM

Gov. Rod Blagojevich was making a good deal of noise about going after conscientious objector pharmacists in the spring. Looks like he did, and East St. Louis Walgreens employees are taking a stand. Good for them.

Send to Kindle

Worthwhile Canadian Election

By on 12.1.05 | 3:06PM

The Liberals got a no-confidence vote earlier this week, and it looks like the Tories have a real shot at forming the next government up north. Good news: It means that the US-friendly Stephen Harper, whom Colby Cosh introduced to TAS readers during the last election a year-and-a-half ago, could be Prime Minister.

Send to Kindle

Tonight on Fox

By on 12.1.05 | 2:44PM

I'll be on with David Asman (who's subbing for John Gibson) tonight about 5:30, talking about the Pentagon plan to have US forces do reconstruction. Do we need a Colonial Office? Methinks not.

Send to Kindle

An Acceptable Discrimination

By on 12.1.05 | 2:20PM

Like Patrick O'Hannigan, Fr. Richard John Neuhaus takes issue with Will Saletan's assessment of the Catholic Church's new document on the ordination of homosexuals at the First Things blog:

Contra Saletan, the Church pastorally cares and prays for people who struggle with disordered desires. But she should not jeopardize the mission of the priesthood by ordaining those who are thought likely to succumb to such desires.

Cardinal Grocholewski, head of the dicastery issuing the instruction, puts it this way: "It is not discrimination, for example, if one does not admit a person who suffers from vertigo to a school for astronauts." More precisely, it is discrimination, although not in the pejorative sense of the term. I suppose it is possible that somebody with a transitory, or even deep-seated, problem with vertigo might be a successful astronaut, but as a matter of policy you don't want to put the possibility to the test.

Send to Kindle

Pages