The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Schiavo Sharon

Ariel Sharon's grave condition has become a political event that can be and will be manipulated by the succession crisis in Jerusalem and the Sharon family troubles.

When and if the life support systems are turned off, Sharon will fail quickly if not immediately. Therefore all preparation of the state funeral now turns on that moment: security, transportation, accommodation. The funeral will be the gathering of the clans that defines the last of the 20th century order of battle: the ancien regime marching behind Sharon the way it marched behind King Edward's hearse in 1910 in London.

More, the funeral will be a sharp break with Sharonism, and this does not favor the unremarkable Ehud Olmert. There is motive for Olmert and the quarreling players of the unborn Forward Party (including the decaying Peres), to delay the funeral as long as possible in the 100 day run-up to the election in order to feed on the sympathy vote for a fallen hero.

At the same time, Sharon's eldest son Omri is under threat of jail time for corruption and is facing even more charges over other graft deals. There is motive for the Sharon Family -- two sons of uncertain political loyalty -- to delay the death while they work out a deal with prosecutors over the legacy of their celebrated patriarch See Horatio Nelson legacy and the betrayed Emma Hamilton.

The longer the delay of the natural order of things -- Sharon is Schiavo writ large -- the more dangerous and cynical the game. Olmert, Netanyahu, Peres, Peretz, Shalom, Mofaz, all of them watch for their moment to lay claim to (undefinable) Sharonism at the graveside. They just need a grave to start their stem-winding praises of Caesar.

And what is the U.S. risk here? Sharon was the Bush administration Mid-East policy since the fall of Baghdad in 2003. Without Sharon, without Arafat, without certainty, let loose the jackals of peace.

topics:
Transportation

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

sidnee| 12.10.09 @ 4:01AM

adidas adicolor shoes
adidas classic shoes

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by John Batchelor

http://spectator.org/blog/2006/01/08/schiavo-sharon

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

ADVERTISEMENT