Chris Roach
slags civil libertarians:
There is literally no time [critics are] willing to let
a close call go to the home team. Their constant criticism of the
techniques employed in the war on terror suggest a complete lack of
realism about national security and, consequently, a total negative
beat on every tough decision this war requires.
Roach paints with a broad brush, but I think he’s on to something.
Maybe
our
resident civ-lib can comment, but it seems that there’s a real
failure — on both sides of the debate, but especially on the civil
libertarian side — to distinguish between expansion of domestic
crime-enforcement powers on the one hand and war-fighting powers on
the other. The former can be genuinely troubling, even shocking;
the latter shouldn’t be nearly as bothersome, particularly in the
context of American history. Wartime civil liberty violations have
tended to grow progressively less serious. William Rehnquist
wrote a book about this — three years before 9/11! — that
helps puts in perspective just how small-bore the current civil
liberties debates are.
sidnee | 12.10.09 @ 3:38AM
adidas adicolor shoes
adidas classic shoes