Glenn Reynolds links to liberal
blogger Ed Cone slagging
the Reverend Freddy's Fashion Mart for endorsing LoanMax, an outfit
that provides high-interest loans to high-risk borrowers. What
would Cone prefer? That poor people just not be allowed to borrow
money? Or that banks be required to float risky loans (which would,
of course, just raise interest rates for everyone)? See Mike Lynch
in the April 2002 Reason for a fuller
discussion of the misguided attack on those who provide
financial services to the poor (Lynch focuses on the check cashing
industry, but his argument applies here, too).
As for Cone's approving link to a neo-Prohibitionist rant
against the Malt Liquor industry, I'll just suggest that when men
have nothing to do but spend all afternoon getting blitzed, to
blame the bottle is a rather facile way of not dealing with an
underclass culture that devalues work and family, developed thanks
in large part to a devasting legacy of liberal social programs (and
I won't defend Sharpton for supporting those).