The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

McCain on Imus on Torture

So let's get this straight -- McCain said that no good information comes from torture because they (the torturees) will "say what they thnk you want to hear to stop the pain." Imus asked about the exception for an impending nuke. McCain, seeking to be reasonable, agreed that in that "one in a million" situation, "go ahead and do it. It's justifiable." Why would torture work in that situation and not others?

First of all, I'd like someone to cite any examples of torture committed by U.S. military personnel that have gone unpunished. Second, absent any proof to the contrary, I'd like Senator McCain and others like him to stop saying, as he did on Imus this morning, that "this torture has to stop." By saying "it" has to stop, he is saying that "it" is going on and accusing our troops of breaking the law. Third, will Senator McCain take his "exception" to the rule to its logical conclusion?

It's okay to torture when it may help save the lives of a million innocent people. How about half a million? Or 250,000? Or 10,000? Or 100? Or 10? (Am I sounding like Father Abraham?)

How about saving a platoon of U.S. Army Infantrymen from an ambush?

Is holding a gun to a terrorist's head and threatening to pull the trigger, torture? If not, why did the Army fire a LTC for doing just that in order to save his men from an ambush?

What would Senator McCain tell the mother of a single soldier who was killed by terrorists in an ambush if that mother found out that we had in custody another terrorist who knew the time and location of the attack but we didn't hang him by his fingernails over a vat of boiling pig fat to save her son?

I'm not defending torture. I actually agree with Senator McCain that it rarely yields reliable intelligence. However, I'd like a better definition of torture. And if it is not too much to ask, perhaps the politicians could give our armed service members the benefit of the doubt instead of accusing them of torturing captive terrorists as SOP.

Moreover, let's give the U.S. military extra credit for actually going out of their way -- too often at the cost of their own lives and limbs -- to minimize civilian casualties or even roil local sensibilities. Our guys wear the white hats, no matter what John Kerry says.

topics:
Law, Military, NATO, Oil

View all comments (12) | Leave a comment

link of london| 9.4.09 @ 9:36PM

Thanks for your information, i have read it, very good!

Links of london Classic smiley| 9.5.09 @ 11:20PM

It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.

pigment Red| 3.31.10 @ 11:01PM

Ink Pigments
Organic Pigments

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Mark Corallo

http://spectator.org/blog/2005/12/07/mccain-on-imus-on-torture
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

ADVERTISEMENT