The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Re: On Second Thought

One oddity in Howard Kurtz’s story is his continuing agnosticism about the forged documents. He complacently accepts the absurd notion that the documents’ authenticity is beyond verification: “Mapes is right that the purported 30-year-old memos by Bush’s long-dead squadron commander have not been proved to be forgeries…” Why does he grant her this concession? Just to make his criticism of her seem a little more even-handed?Â

View all comments (9) |

link of london | 9.4.09 @ 9:48PM

Thanks for your information, i have read it, very good!

Links of london Raindance | 9.6.09 @ 12:56AM

It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.

tiffany price | 9.10.09 @ 12:51AM

It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.

More Blog Posts by George Neumayr

http://spectator.org/blog/2005/11/21/re-on-second-thought

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

Damage Control for Dummies

Matt Purple | 5.22.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Obama’s Assault on the First Amendment

George Neumayr | 5.22.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT