After stumbling around for a while, the mainstream press has
finally found an organizing principle: if an event/person
advances antiwar coverage, let’s push it hard. Almost
everything in the media is now judged according to
its relationship to the war, including the merits of
journalists. Had Judith Miller provided some fine antiwar articles
before her imbroglio, she would still be at theÂ
New York Times. Had Bob Woodward smoked out
some war-related scandal before this week’sÂ
controversy, his colleagues would be celebrating not condemning
his cavalier and sloppy habits. Who was and who was
not on the right side of the antiwar line? That’s what
determines coverage. Â
links london | 9.4.09 @ 9:37PM
Thanks for your information, i have read it, very good!
Links of london Classic smiley | 9.5.09 @ 11:20PM
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
tiffany & co | 9.10.09 @ 12:43AM
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.