D.,
I don't even think that there's a recognition that there is a
debate. For many, as Dr. Krauthammer taps his medical degree and
invariably tries to end the discussion. Many think there's an
immediately reconcilable edition of Darwinism that will cater to
those who don't wish their religious ideals to obfuscate their
arguments; sort of a Rawlsian relapse into arguments about private
reason vs. public reason. Because Darwinism is so poorly
understood, it winds up misrepresented in such a way that even
Wilson feels it's being sold short.