Christopher Hitchens' lecture on Jefferson's role in the American founding was a delight. Hitchens broadly outlined Jefferson's contributions to the American experiment in the areas of the Enlightenment, internal nation building, the projection of national power, and the separation of church and state. The writer entertained a substantial Q&A period, followed by lunch and a lengthy discussion with the Witherspoon Fellows.
Here are some highlights in no particular order:
-In one notable Q&A exchange, an audience member challenged the
Sally Hemmings affair, and Hitchens argued persuasively that the
forensic evidence sufficiently supports that case without the DNA
evidence.
-Hitchens said Jefferson established an important executive power
precedent when he bowed to John Marshall's authority in turning
over all relevant materials for the Aaron Burr treason case.
-Jefferson acted against his federalist principles in maintaining a
standing army and executing the Louisiana Purchase. He regarded
both as unconstitutional, but justified them in the pursuit of
American greatness.
-Hitchens conceded that in Jefferson's letter
to the Danbury (Conn.) Baptists, where the phrase "wall of
separation of church and state" originates, Jefferson meant that
his role as a federal officer prevented him from intervening in
this matter between the church and the state of Connecticut more
than he was making a secularist case.
-On deism: "It's the worst of both worlds."
-On the King James Bible: "[Not using it] is one of the great
limitations of secularism. It lacks the great metaphors."
-Hitchens said Jefferson would be "outraged" that Canada still
exists if he returned today and would wonder what the manhood of
America has been up to if the Union Jack still flies in Ottawa.
Hitchens and folks at FRC got along just fine. They were respectful, engaged, and inquisitive, and Hitchens was quite gracious. Look out for Hitchens' forthcoming book on Thomas Paine next year.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
sidnee| 12.10.09 @ 2:58AM
adidas adicolor shoes
adidas classic shoes