St. Martin's Press has hit upon a novel advertising strategy for
its release of Mary Mapes' book, emphasizing that she is now flying
with even less of a net below her than before. "No One's Censoring
Her Now," reads the ad in the New Yorker. Now she's
got no editor, it exults: "Get the clear, unedited picture of the
biggest news stories in the run-up to the 2004 election."
See the Forgeries They Didn't Let Her Run!
Meanwhile, in a rollout Joan Didion might envy, the
Washington Post runs today a
review of Mapes' book and a Howard Kurtz
story about her. The reviewer, Paul Farhi, reminds readers of
the proper lens through which to examine the fiasco:
the bloggers were right but bad; Mapes was wrong but good. "Her
case is by no means airtight," he allows, but "it does suggest that
if the Killian memos were fakes, they were more artful, rigorous
and extraordinarily well-crafted fakes than Mapes's accusers are
willing to admit." Farhi calls the bloggers a "mob"
who should have given Mapes an A for effort: "She may have been
duped, but she was demonstrably not reckless in her pursuit
of this story."
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the
information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of
post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the
information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of
post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
tiffany london| 9.4.09 @ 3:26AM
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
tiffany jewellery| 9.10.09 @ 12:38AM
It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
sidnee| 12.10.09 @ 2:59AM
adidas adicolor shoes
adidas classic shoes