The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

In the end, it is impossible to understate the importance of what went on in the Senate today. The fanfare, the rumors, and all the nonsensical puffery came down to this: the Dems are clinically depressed that Patrick Fitzgerald didn't deliver for them an indictment -- not only of Karl Rove -- but of the Iraq war itself.

If you watched Jay Rockefeller -- he being one of the three under criminal investigation for leaking details of a top-secret satellite program -- huffing and puffing about what the Senate Intelligence Committee wasn't doing but should, you heard every whine the liberals have about the war. Not only should they be investigating former DoD Undersecretary for Policy Doug Feith, but they should also be investigating: detainee abuse, interrogation methods, rendition of terrorist prisoners to other nations and -- yes -- the whole issue of whether intelligence was manipulated by the Bush administration to lie America into war.

The problem that Rockefeller, Reid, and the rest have is that Pat Roberts's committee is working hard on precisely what the Senate agreed to in February of 2004. And they were about to get the next stage next week when Reid, Rockefeller, and Durbin blew it all up today.

Now, after all that kerfuffle, all today's intense scrutiny on Senate process -- and all the intensely personal insults traded behind closed doors -- all the Dems managed to get was agreement that a group of six senators would look at what the Intelligence Committee is doing and report back on its schedule.

The best thing that comes out of today -- and it has everything to do with personalities and nothing to do with substance -- is that by this personal attack on Roberts and others today, the Dems have made it more difficult for RINOs to maneuver. McCain and his Gang of 14 will also find it a lot harder to stay together if, as seems almost certain, the Dems try to filibuster Judge Alito. Heavy-handedness by Reid helps Alito.

topics:
Trade, Iraq, NATO

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

sidnee| 12.10.09 @ 2:33AM

adidas adicolor shoes
adidas classic shoes

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Jed Babbin

http://spectator.org/blog/2005/11/01/non-vintage-stuff-from-reids-w

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Greg Sowards Battles Queen RINO

Jeffrey Lord | 5.24.12

We Have To Do Something

Ben Stein | 5.24.12

The Problem With High-Mileage Cars

Eric Peters | 5.24.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT