Grover Norquist doesn't need my help defending himself in this
dustup with the social conservatives over his decision to keynote
the Log Cabin Republican dinner, but alas...
Anyone familiar with Grover's "Wednesday meeting" knows that it
serves mainly as a forum for the broader center-right community --
not just for the more hardcore among us. (As a contrast, Paul
Weyrich runs a similar weekly meeting where the focus is much more
on social conservatism.) Anyway, Grover's focus as the host of
these sessions has always been on identifying key issues on which
most groups on the right can agree, and then working to move the
ball forward on said issues. I neither find it unusual nor
disturbing that he would appear at a Log Cabin event, as there are
a host of issues that come up at his meetings which I am sure the
LCRs support enthusiastically. Grover's "thing" is inclusion and
consensus-building, it always has been, and everyone knows that. So
to smack him around for being there for a group that's probably
been there for him on some key fights is, I think, a little
uncalled for.
topics:
Conservatism