The Washington Post, evidently irritated that Pat Leahy
called its account of his meeting with Harriet Miers "not
really all that accurate" on This Week, runs a
little follow-up story today in an attempt to vindicate its
reporting that Miers said "Warren," before saying "Warren Burger,"
in answer to Leahy's question about her favorite justices. Leahy,
according to the Post, had told the story loudly to
several aides who heard "the senator describe Miers as stumbling
over Burger's name, at first calling him 'Warren'."
Neither Leahy nor the White House disputed the Post's
account of the story last Friday. But for some reason Leahy
felt the need to change his story on Sunday morning. The
White House, no doubt thrilled that the new version of the
story was less damaging to Miers, quickly said it
agreed with Leahy's new account of the conversation.
The White House is still spinning Miers' admiration for Burger
as nothing more than a respect for his administrative tidiness.
But this doesn't add up because Burger was known asÂ
administratively inept. Could Miers have said, "Warren,"
caught herself, and then fished around for a better Warren
than Earl Warren to name not realizing that would create a
new set of problems for her?
topics:
NATO