I suspect the explanation will be that Miers’s firm, like lots
of companies with PACs, spread their donations on both sides of the
aisle (true), and that Miers wasn’t the one who decided how funds
were distributed (probably true). WorldNetDaily — which the
Boston Herald for some reason thinks is “left-leaning” —
has the full story that the Herald
re-reports in summary; the firm supported 14 Democrats and 10
Republicans in the 2000 cycle. And OpenSecrets.org reveals that the firm’s soft money donations
favored Republicans in the 2000 cycle.
Her and her firm’s political donation history tell us very
little about Miers. Not that I’m warming to the nominee; quite the
opposite. Her reported support for racial preferences may be
reason enough to hope her nomination fails.
sidnee | 12.10.09 @ 1:01AM
cheap adidas shoes
cheap nike dunk sb shoes