With one GOP Congressional leader on the
legal ropes, the suspicions around the Senate Majority Leader, the
good Dr. Frist, deserve a closer look. It just so happens that a
leading blogger on the right is also a UCLA law professor
specializing in corporate law, Stephen
Bainbridge:
If some SEC enforcement lawyer in fact were
to start looking into this, the first question will be whether
Frist had material nonpublic information about HCA at the time he
ordered the sale. If he had the common sense God gave gravel, the
answer to that will be a resounding no. For somebody in his
position to retain access to such information would exacerbate the
inherent conflict of interest that arises when he deals with health
care issues, as well as potentially exposing him to insider trading
liability.
Bainbridge goes on to explain, from his law book on
the subject, that in light of the case law and the SEC rule, if
Frist can convince a court that he was trading to clear a conflict
of interest even if he possessed insider info, he's free and
clear.
topics:
Trade, Law