May 14, 2013 | 1 comment
May 8, 2013 | 4 comments
April 19, 2013 | 3 comments
April 18, 2013 | 3 comments
February 26, 2013 | 8 comments
During my many years of living in Indiana, I always regarded the harmless, cuddly woodchuck as the state’s unofficial animal. But now after Sen. Evan Bayh’s cowardly coming out against fellow Hoosier John Roberts, Indiana may have to adopt the weasel as its native rodent.
Bayh was supposed to be the moderate, sane hope of his party. Instead, he betrays someone who’s a feather in ever Hoosier’s cap in order to please the MoveOn-ers who make the most noise in his party. Even the Indiana University student paper, the Indiana Daily Student (back in my day often called the “Indiana Daily Stupid,” for all the usual adolescent reasons), has expressed disappointment at Bayh’s decision.
In his curt (270-word) introduction of Roberts on day one of the nominee’s confirmation hearings, Bayh expressed guarded pride “that someone from our state would be so talented and so successful to be considered for a position on the highest court of our land.” In a tortured 750-word press release last Friday, Bayh goes through all the mealy-mouthed arguments the Hillary’s and Teddy’s have already made in explaining their opposition to Roberts. “I cannot vote to confirm,” he squirms, “not because I oppose John Roberts…” Since when is a no vote not a vote in opposition?
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?