The White House is sending mixed signals on its next Supreme Court nominee. According to staff of Republican Judiciary members who have been briefed by the White House, they were encouraged by the message. “We weren’t hearing any names, but were told that we’d be happy with the pick, that it would be someone we could easily rally behind,” says a Republican staffer of a Judiciary committee member.
But that isn’t the only story coming off Capitol Hill. According to Senate leadership sources present at a meeting last Thursday between White House staff involved in the Supreme Court nomination process and senior Senate staff, the message was quite different. “We were told that regardless of the pick, it was important for us to get behind him or her,” says someone who attended the meeting. “It wasn’t stated, but the message we got was that there is a very good chance this is not going to be a pick that we particularly like.”
According to White House sources, several more names will be floated in the press in the next couple of days, and there is an expectation that a nominee will be brought forward sooner rather than later.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?