The Spectacle Blog

Re: Lose Yourself in the Music

By on 12.20.05 | 4:13PM

But John! By using rap, they'll only be encouraging these peaceful young jihadists towards violence!

Will they also have to freestyle when interrogated? Will that also be considered cruel?

Send to Kindle

Re: Lose Yourself in the Music

By on 12.20.05 | 4:09PM

Let's not forget how U.S. troops drove Gen. Noriega out of his compound: blasting AC/DC. By the standards of the Human Rights Watch, that must have been torture as well.

Send to Kindle


By on 12.20.05 | 3:31PM

Alphabet soup prevails in Washington, but the headline means to say that the Democratic Party is sending the administration a Freedom of Information Act request for info on the National Security Agency's domestic wiretapping. They erroneously call it "domestic spying," but no matter. The real entertainment is watching Howard Dean try to appear earnest. He begins his missive:

This is not an easy letter to write, and I'm afraid it may be a hard one to believe.

Come now, Chairman. What's hard to believe is that you don't enjoy writing the letter. Revel away and help Americans dissociate Democrats and national security. Now would be a great time for a party leader to have some credibility and gravitas in store instead of a history of rabid partisan opportunism.

Send to Kindle

Gone Bowling

By on 12.20.05 | 3:29PM

The fun of the College Football bowl games begins. For a preview into what this bowl season will bring, check out Fox Sports' witty analysis, starting with the "Can't Miss" ranking all the way down to the "Serious Dog Potential" category which features such classics as the Fort Worth Bowl (Houston vs. Kansas), Meineke Car Care Bowl (NC State vs. South Florida), the Emerald Bowl (Utah vs. Georgia Tech -- the bees have lost their sting), the Sheraton Hawaii Bowl (UCF vs. Nevada), and the best named of them all, the San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl (Colorado State vs. Navy).

My "money" will wait for the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl featuring my beloved Fightin' Irish (Grandpa belonged to the "Class of the Finest," '44) vs. Ohio State (boo, hiss, boo).

And for the record, thank goodness this is the last year of BCS-ridiculousness! Here's to having a fair and square college football champ next year.

Send to Kindle

Re: “A Touch Wearying to the Spirit”

By on 12.20.05 | 3:12PM

As a part of Hitch's "Scrooge You" article, he cites this article, saying, essentially, that when Christians are arguing in favor of celebrating Christ in the public square, from Christmas music in shops to greeting card corrections, they are essentially committing the same terrible, terrible deed as the North Koreans celebrating the birthday of Kim Jong Il:

Send to Kindle

‘A Touch Wearying to the Spirit’

By on 12.20.05 | 1:53PM

Those following the Great "Merry Christmas" Debate of 2005 won't want to miss Christopher Hitchens' volley on the topic. He's wrong about Oliver Cromwell's reason for banning Christmas (it wasn't the corruption of the holiday, but because of Puritan theological principles). But the vehemence and spirit of his disgust with the Christmas reactionaries is understandable.

Send to Kindle

So How Fast are You in the 440?

By on 12.20.05 | 1:39PM

A decent question to which Mr. William Beltran and Ms. Shairalee Delgado may have a lot of time to work out a better answer whilst serving a coupla years for shoplifting. Seems those two nitwits were boosting about a grand worth of clothes from a Ft. Myers, Florida store. According to a rather hilarious NBC news report When they escaped the store security folks, a couple of nice young men, just graduated from boot camp, took up the pursuit. The Marines chased them for almost a mile, and captured the two before turning them over to the cops. Against the Marines did the shoplifters have any chance? Successful pursuers, Pvts. Shane Ailant and Ryan Pitts of the U.S. Marine Corps, didn't think so. "No sir, not at all." Well done, guys. (Hat tip to #1 son, who knows I love such stuff.)

Send to Kindle

Roberts Rakes Rockefeller

By on 12.20.05 | 11:53AM

Yesterday, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), co-chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee (and probable source of many leaks of secret information) released a hand-scrawled letter he had written to VP Cheney two years ago after being briefed on the NSA domestic intel effort. Rockefeller, trying to score political points, raised the letter as proof of his doubts about the NSA program, and that his hands were tied, unable to do anything about it. This morning, Intel Committee Chair Pat Roberts (R-KS) released this statement which blows Rockefeller out of the water:

I am puzzled by the release yesterday of a July 2003 letter from Senator Rockefeller to the Vice President regarding the recently exposed intelligence collection program, which was authorized by the President shortly after September 11, 2001.

In his letter and accompanying press statement, Senator Rockefeller asserts that he had lingering concerns about the program designed to protect the American people from another attack, but was prohibited from doing anything about it.

Send to Kindle

Mormons and Romney, Part Deux

By on 12.20.05 | 11:21AM

While some readers were upset that I detailed the potential problem of Mitt Romney's religion last week, Kathryn Jean Lopez's article/interview today reaffirms this issue's prominence on conservatives' radars.

Lopez is correct that the juvenile stuff is a non-starter: questions about the temple garments, SNL-style jokes about Romney engaging in polygamy, etc. Her interview subject, Michael Cromarite of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, confirms a few basic points about the issue of Romney's Mormonism:

-It won't be discussed as a public campaign issue, but quietly at dinner parties and among blogs. That buzz will be a sizable challenge for Romney.

-Evangelicals think Mormonism is a cult. Evangelicals are a large part of the GOP. A large part of the GOP will have serious questions for Romney.

-Given the choice between (fairly) pro-life Romney and dyed-in-the-wool pro-abortion candidate X, social conservatives will likely back Romney.

Send to Kindle