The Spectacle Blog

More Michael Savage

By on 10.28.06 | 10:47AM

We need to get Wlady in on this. He was actually interviewed by Savage.

If you listen to Savage much, which I did for a couple of years when he was my drive-time conservative talk radio guy, it's hard to imagine he would ever back Jerry Brown if he was really drinking his own kool-aid. Brown is against everything Savage claims to be for.

You're quite right that Savage is actually Michael Weiner, a Ph.D. nutrition guru from way back and that his old affections could explain his donation to Brown, but I think it just cements the case that "Savage" is a concoction designed to make money and doesn't represent what he really thinks. It's more like he said to himself, "Nobody is doing a really great job of appealing to everyone's worst instincts. Let's have a shot at it and see if there's money to be made." Not surprisingly, there are a lot of dollars swimming at the lowest common denominator.

Re: Michael Savage - Liberal

By on 10.28.06 | 9:24AM

Hunter, I don't know if I can buy that Michael Savage is a put-on. I do absolutely agree with your description of him, however. I've thought, since the moment I first heard him, "This is what liberals think conservatives sound like." Chalk up his contribution to Jerry Brown to an old-time hippie fondness -- Savage was a health food guru, after all.

Re: Webb’s Eroticism

By on 10.27.06 | 3:19PM

Phil, Larry: We should count our lucky stars we don't live in Iran. Otherwise Allen would have issued a fatwah against Webb -- assuming Allen had survived the fatwahs already issued against him.

Re: Webb’s Eroticism

By on 10.27.06 | 2:31PM

Larry, thanks for the clarification on James Webb's novels. My comment was more referring to the erotic parts, which read to me like a cheap romance novel. Looking back at my post, I shouldn't have painted with so broad a brush. I also agree that it's completely silly of Allen to try to make a campaign issue of this.

Toothless Hyenas

By on 10.27.06 | 1:28PM

I am watching the White House press briefing with the incomparable Tony Snow, and I am just amazed at how unaware the White House press corps is that they come across like a pathetic pack of starving but toothless hyenas. Again and again they ask about Dick Cheney's "dunking" comments and insisting that the Veep is endorsing waterboarding (not, as Seinfeld would say, that there's anything wrong with that), and again and again Tony keeps his humor and repeats the rest of the Veep's answer, immediately thereafter, that he does NOT endorse torture. After a while, the viewer is left with this thought: Who the $#&^&*@ cares? I wish all Americans were forced to watch this nonsense. Americans care about providing for their families and making sure they are protected from criminals and terrorists. They don't care whether a "dunk" in the water is the same as or different than a technique called "waterboarding," when the dunkee is a suspected terrorist. Yeah, they don't want anybody subjected to the sorts of painful treatment, the actual torture, that John McCain suffered from in Vietnam -- but they aren't too concerned about bad guys getting wet.

The Tribes Vote — A Followup

By on 10.27.06 | 1:16PM

In my column of a couple of weeks ago, I wondered which way the political and ethnic tribes of Massachusetts would vote in the gubernatorial election between Devel Patrick, a Democrat and a black man, and Kerry Healey, the Republican Lieutenant Governor, and a woman. The polls have apparently revealed the result.

The tribes have done what they do best, which is get a really good hate on -- for Healey. They're going to show that persnickety Beacon Hill WASP bee-eye-itch,and hand her a 25-point loss. This place! There's a joke about Venezuela, where somebody says to God that he's given Venezuelans everything, resources, mountains, forests, fertile land, the sea, and God says, yes, but I made it up by giving the country Venezuelans. It's kind of like that in Massachusetts, one of the loveliest states in the union, populated some of the grouchiest, nastiest, most narrow-minded people in the country. Who will cut off their noses to spite their faces over and over again.

Re: Webb’s Eroticism

By on 10.27.06 | 1:09PM

Phillip, I can only assume you haven't read James Webb's novels. I long ago read and admired every one. He started out as a kind of clumsy tough-guy military writer, and advanced in skill to profound effectiveness, in The Emperor's General. In many respects, his fiction-writing career parallels Joseph Wambaugh's, in whose books you will find many similar images. Why? Because both men were in settings where such things happened, and were said. Nowhere in the criticism of Webb has it been mentioned that almost all the scenes -- especially the ones most emphasized -- take place in third world countries, among third world peoples. These "revelations" show more about the profound illiteracy of most Americans than they do anything else. You want to ask these complainers, "Ever read Last Exit to Brooklyn? Tropic of Cancer? Fear of Flying, for Pete's sake?"

I suppose the novel excerpts may put the last nails in the coffin of the Webb candidacy, but I think it's silly.