The Spectacle Blog

Jack Cafferty is Horrendous

By on 10.10.06 | 5:08PM

I just watched CNN's Jack Cafferty, on Wolf Blitzer's "The Situation," do one of the most despicable hit jobs I've ever seen. He ripped into Virginia's Sen. George Allen as if Allen were some sort of David Duke type. He intimated that Allen was lying about having only recently discovered that his mother was Jewish as a child. He made Allen's stock option kerfuffle--a perfectly believable misunderstanding: after all, the options haven't been worth a dime under current pricing--sound like a major ethical violation. Cafferty all but said that Allen is a raving racist. And he said it is unbelievable that such a lout could possibly still be leading in the polls. And so on.

Question for CNN: When, oh when, will you ever let a conservative do such a hit job against a liberal in a commentary during what otherwise is (supposedly) a straight news hour??? Do your producers have even a sliver of character themselves? How can they possibly claim to be fair when they so consistently skew things in the same direction?

Re: 7 to 30

By on 10.10.06 | 1:00PM

Notice the slick expectations-management on the part of NRCC bigwig Tom Davis:

"If you are a Democrat, you have to like the atmosphere," said Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (Va.), a top campaign strategist for the GOP. Davis said Republicans could lose as many as 30 seats if conditions worsen.
As Davis must know, conditions would have to "worsen" quite a bit to make that prediction plausible; as of now a loss of around 25 seats looks like the absolute worst-case scenario. But no matter how bad the GOP is doing, reporters are always eager to believe it's doing even worse, so it was no problem getting the Post to play up a possible 30-seat loss. Now, even in the face of an election night disaster, GOP strategists like Davis can still claim that Republicans have exceeded expectations, and all thanks to the brilliant work of... GOP strategists like Davis.

An Offer China Can’t Refuse

By on 10.10.06 | 12:37PM

Cliff May makes a good point about perhaps the one bit of leverage we have over China:

“If you won't stand in the way of a nuclear North Korea, we won't stand in the way of a nuclear Japan. Continue along the present course and soon, you will face an Asia where your adversaries are armed with nuclear weapons.”

David Frum touches on this as well in a column for today's NY Times. America certainly would have a partner in Japan's new hardline Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe.  

Forget Jimmy Carter

By on 10.10.06 | 11:55AM

Here's an example of how you get real diplomatic results. In light of this momentus development, Simple Life season seven should be filmed in the Korean Demilitarized Zone with Paris and Nicole each assigned a nation and the ultimate goal of peace.

If Paris Hilton is busy, I thought Doug Bandow's thoughts on the Korean conundrum were pretty good, too, though.

7 to 30

By on 10.10.06 | 10:55AM

That's how many House seats "Republican campaign officials" expect to lose, according to an article on the front page of today's Washington Post. As far as the debate over whether Republicans would learn their lesson by losing and show a renewed comittment to limited government, the article makes this seem unlikely. Rather than attributing the GOP's bad prospects to abandoning small government principles, the article cites "sustained violence in Iraq and the page scandal involving former GOP representative Mark Foley."

Socialized UFOcare

By on 10.10.06 | 10:40AM

Following the news that a German lawyer plans to sue the government for compensation on behalf of people who say they've been abducted by aliens, I couldn't help but think that the government would save a lot of money were it to purchase UFO abduction insurance. It's only $19.95 for a lifetime policy!

Nuclear Dud?

By on 10.10.06 | 10:32AM

In today's Washington Times, Bill Gertz reports that North Korea's weapons test was not nuclear. The Washington Post cites other U.S. sources claiming the explosion was a half a kiloton (which is less than 1/40th the power of the blast caused by the A-bomb the U.S. dropped on Nagasaki). Meanwhile, Russia says it was definitely nuclear, actually five-to-15 kilotons. It's hard to know what to read in the large discrepancy between the estimates, so, like everything else involving North Korea, this may remain shrouded in mystery.

Pages