Feature
Betting on Rick Perry
John H. Fund | from the October 2011 issue
He’s a winner in a Republican year, with no need in the world to win liberal approval.
He’s a winner in a Republican year, with no need in the world to win liberal approval.
For starters, he was principled, fearless, and astute. And Washington, D.C., never trusted him, because he knew the real source of America’s greatness.
What is Mitt Romney doing siding with Chuck Schumer in his protectionist pandering against China and the American consumer?
The Wall Street protests ramble on, but is there a unifying theme to any of it?
One clean-cut journalist goes undercover with the protesters.
Or to put it another way, Babies, the rain must fall.
The Health Care Compact Alliance is picking up where Paul Ryan left off.
Ron Paul-style isolationists are dead wrong on America’s place in the world.
Thirty-three years can make all the difference.
Palin finally ends speculation about 2012 — and wins new scorn from the derangement syndrome crowd.
Steve Jobs reminded us that making money can also make other people’s lives better.
He takes pride in his inferior administration.
No reporter has better captured the smallness of this man’s modest gifts than Ron Suskind.
And not everything out there is as perfect as Julie.
Steven Pinker says the modern world is a remarkably peaceful place.
One would think so — yet under this presidency he will never be allowed to rest in peace.
Everything you thought it knows about baseball is wrong.
The fate of Obamacare, and your individual liberty, could be decided by Anthony Kennedy.
The Lifetime movie certainly didn’t do her justice.
As previewed at the last debate, he’s delivered a product “far bolder, far deeper, far more profound” than 1994’s Contract, not to mention 1980’s.
Who’s spending whose money? That’s the crucial question.
In Australia, talking about race is now a thoughtcrime.
Mother Jones investigates the billionaire Koch Brothers. Hypocrisy and stupidity ensue.
Liberal-mindedness at its most condescending and self-regarding.
The network that saved honest journalism celebrates triumph over liberal media.
But they’re not so hot themselves, as a Reason Foundation study delicately points out.
It will mean taxing New York and California — and exposing the president’s bicoastal, parasitical elite.
In his new book, available today, J. Christian Adams chronicles lawlessness in the Obama machine.
As a mathematician he would teach the incumbent a thing or two about “simple math.”
Thanks to the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, “taxes are off the table” — and the president can’t stand it.
Pakistan and China are bonding over a common enemy: the United States.
Critics see more conflicts for Obama’s go-to guy on the National Labor Relations Board.
A whack-a-mole strategy is hardly enough — especially if Republicans continue sitting this one out.
The EPA is a case study in just how broken our system is.
Yet one more way he’s polluting our politics.
And just in time, giving the Bipartisan Committee a unique Social Security opportunity.
Capital punishment again faces much religious opposition — and renewed support.
Our friends in academia have a new target. And he lives in a pineapple under the sea.
Sandpoint, Idaho, was never more glorious than this past summer.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?