But here is the first coming sequester lie. When the economy
turns down this year, Obama and his socialist Democrats will all
blame it on the sequester spending cuts. Cut just the
increase in government spending by just 1%, and that is
supposed to be the roots of another recession. The great debate
will be what caused the downturn, the spending “cuts” or the tax
increases, (plus regulation, plus the cheap dollar, plus the
exploding escalation of debt). That is if our party-controlled, new
socialist media (stop calling them the mainstream media, nothing
remotely mainstream about them) even allows the debate on the
air.
Republicans Gaining Some Control Over
Spending
But one emerging truth out of the
sequester battle is that the Republicans are gaining some control
over spending. The sequester spending cuts over 10 years total $1.2
trillion, out of a 10-year budget of $47 trillion, or 2.5%. But the
next battle over spending presents opportunity for still more
spending restraint.
That is not the debt ceiling, which leaves the Republicans with
little leverage, because Obama has already convinced the country
that failing to increase the debt limit means defaulting on the
national debt. Even Fox News reports on it that way, as if you
can’t continue payments on what you owe on your credit card unless
you get an increase in your credit limit. You see what I mean when
I say our country is so dumbed down right now?
The opportunity is the continuing resolution (the CR in
Washington parlance) to authorize government spending for the rest
of this year. The current continuing resolution providing such
authorization runs out at the end of this month.
The opportunity is for the Republicans to pass a new continuing
resolution that provides for continuing discretionary government
spending, or at least domestic discretionary spending, at the exact
same levels as last year, minus the already enacted sequester
spending cuts. The Republicans and the conservatives then need to
drive home to the public two simple points.
One is that the continuing resolution involves no new spending
cuts. It just continues government spending at the same levels as
last year. This can successfully counter the Democrat media theme
that crazed radical Republicans want to tear the federal government
to pieces, destroying the economy and the safety net for the poor,
sick, weak, and vulnerable in the process. But such an effective
spending freeze even on just discretionary domestic spending will
add up to serious savings over time.
The second point then is that the Republican House has already
acted in passing the continuing resolution to keep the government
open and operating. If the Democrats don’t agree with the
continuing resolution that the Republicans have passed, their job
is to pass their own continuing resolution through the Senate. Then
any differences and compromises can be worked out in the House
Senate Conference. The Republicans can and should talk to President
Obama if he wants, but that must not prevent them for acting
and explaining the process to the American people.
The Republicans have to be focused in driving this point home,
because the Democrat-party controlled media at NBC, CBS, ABC, the
New York Times, the Washington Post, etc. will
definitely not keep the public informed as to what is happening in
Washington with their federal government. I have read two
Washington Post columns this past week by closet Marxist
revolutionaries E.J. Dionne and Dana Milbank who misinformed
readers that the Republicans failed to act to do anything to pass
an alternative to the sequester, when the truth is the Republican
House passed two alternative sequester bills that
rationalized the spending cuts, and the Democrats failed
to take any action. If you or anyone you know is subscribing to the
Washington Post, that is part of the problem causing the
decline and fall of America. Ditto that for the openly Marxist
New York Times. (I read the columns in Investor’s
Business Daily).
Moreover, this current dumbed down American public cannot be
counted on to know the process for passing legislation in
Washington. The American public today does not recall their high
school civics teaching that the process for passing federal
legislation is the House and Senate pass their bills, then they go
to Conference Committee for compromise, and then the President
either signs of vetoes the legislation.
This process will force the Democrats to take a stand in the
light of day that they want to increase spending,
deficits, and debt still more, even while the country is careening
towards bankruptcy. The whole point of the Democrat Senate failure
to pass any budget in the past four years is to hide this from the
American people. Forcing the Democrats to act in public where they
can be held accountable will frame the issue for the public
correctly.
The Republicans and the conservatives need to drive
this second point home also so that the public can understand who
to hold accountable for any government shutdown. The President has
the bully pulpit, and the party-controlled media, so artfully
informing the public of the truth is critical.
House Republicans can help their case for controlling government
spending immensely if they will hold aggressive oversight hearings
on government waste, fraud, and abuse. When the Democrats wanted to
slash defense spending, they held hearings about the Defense
Department buying $100 hammers and $500 toilet seats. OMB and GAO
have already documented failed government programs not
accomplishing their stated laudatory goals, and at least $125
billion in waste, fraud, and abuse. Holding hearings to communicate
and dramatize that would put Democrat socialists on the defensive.
Sure the Democrat party-controlled media will not cover it. But the
alternative conservative media will, embarrassing the party hack
media in the process.
But here is the second coming sequester lie. If the Republicans
are successful in these spending restraint strategies, you know of
course Obama will take the credit. After the 25% increase in
government spending in year one of Obama’s term, the spending
increases Obama can get through from that base with the
Republican-controlled House may appear negligible, especially in
percentage terms. The Democrat party-controlled media will then
sing Obama’s praises as the most restrained government spender
since Eisenhower.
Photo: WhiteHouse.gov
Intelligent Design| 3.6.13 @ 7:57AM
Secretary of State Kerry announced Sunday that the U.S. is giving $250 million to the Muslim Brotherhood government of Egypt. This along with $1 billion in military jets Obama has already given his Muslim friends. Sequester???
It is widely known that the Muslim Brotherhood is the parent of the terrorist group Hamas, which is trying to kill Jews and destroy Israel. It is also true that the Muslim Brotherhood advocates full utilization of sharia law in Egypt (most Egyptians want it). It is also true that in February 2011 the Director of the FBI, Robert Mueller, told the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the Muslim Brotherhood supports terrorism. And we know that a key documented goal of the Muslim Brotherhood is "the destruction of Western civilization from within."
Giving cash and military assets to the Muslim Brotherhood government of Egypt is the same as giving aid to Muslim terrorists, with whom we are at war. Sequester???
TLP| 3.6.13 @ 10:28AM
You left out the 300 FREE Abrhams Tanks he gave Morsi, to go with those FREE F-16s.
But, don't worry.
He's the Best Friend Israel's ever had.
Just ask Chuckie Shylock Schumer.
Or, any other Democrat Jew Politician.
TLP| 3.6.13 @ 1:28PM
That should've read "Jewish", not "Jew".
Shalom.
mike 3/505| 3.6.13 @ 6:41PM
Salaam alaykum
Hardcard| 3.6.13 @ 8:24AM
Sequester ?? No treason. Obamao jdingo's pal chavez left this world without the 2 billion he stole from his people, a true collectivist, socialist, marxist, he collected from his people as much as he could lay his thieving paws on and redistributed it to his personal stash. How rich will our dear leader be when he takes a dirt nap? No sequester in Egypt. Keep looking upward to the sky, you could be next on the HIT PARADE, drone on, eric the red says it's okeydoaky for dear leader to terminate with malice, all of you unpatriotic right wing nuts who might not be happy about the theft of your freedom and wealth by dear leader and regime. What me worry? Hey you didn't build that !!!!
Sjccoach| 3.6.13 @ 9:12AM
More big government conservative nonsense from Mr.Ferrara. The federal government has no business in education. Federal government education spending does not have positive economic growth effects. It is money poured down a rat hole to fund the teacher's unions.
markenoff| 3.6.13 @ 7:46PM
It's not education it's indoctrination.
Von Mises Jr| 3.6.13 @ 9:48AM
The Republicans stand for nothing and they will continue to stand for nothing.
The CR and Debt Ceiling will be raised. If the economy tanks, the liberals will try to blame Bush, Boehner and McConnell and they may succeed.
But the loss of jobs due to ObamaCare and Dodd Frank cannot easily be blamed on the Republicans. And most of all, OBAMACARE BELONGS TO OBAMA.
If you haven't noticed, they now want to call it the "affordable Care Act." But it is not. It is OBAMACARE. And when people lose their coverage, premiums necessarily skyrocket, fines of 1% to 2.5% start to kick in 2014 and people's mother get a pill instead of a procedure; the liberals are going to have a hell of a time blaming OBAMACARE on the GOP.
They will try, but good luck with that.
Stephie| 3.6.13 @ 11:36AM
But Boehner still wants to fund the monstrosity. They have the ability to NOT fund it but willingly give barry what he wants.
Von Mises Jr| 3.6.13 @ 11:59AM
The OsamaCare Exchanges and Medicaid Expansion are not in the Budget. So if Boehner and McConnell fund it, then they are for it.
That confirms my theorem that the GOP prefers the Statist, socialist kabuki dance with the Democrats and is selling the conservatives and the Constitution down the river for their share of the power.
Watch what Boehner does, not what he says. If we haven't learned that from barry yet, we are fools.
Russel| 3.6.13 @ 10:04AM
Even a hardcore socialist liberal has a wallet , and they are quite stingy about its contents . Ya gotta howl with laughter when even dumb -as a-post Donna Brazille complains about O'Bummercare . The coming attractions can't obscure that fact . It's going to be a headliner , not more cuts . Mr. Boner , get up and yell to the American people these are NOT cuts , but a diminished increase .
Bob Grant| 3.6.13 @ 10:27AM
You sometimes wonder if republicans' incompetence/ineptitude is by design?
Santiago| 3.6.13 @ 10:41AM
"If you want a booming capitalist country following the policies of Reaganomics, move to formerly socialist Canada."
Or Singapore, or Chile, or New Zealand, or Switzerland, or Hong Kong..............even Colombia has made strides in reducing violent crime while increasing business freedoms in the last 15 years.
Al Adab| 3.6.13 @ 11:13AM
The coming lies are being designed to cause as much harm and fear in the population as possible. The administration is more concerned with political gain than with governing the nation. Why else would DHS release illegals in custody while purchasing over 2500 light tanks and APVs? Can we expect DHS to use those vehicles on the border? Hopefully the public is not buying the doomsday scenario as they did back when Clinton faced the government shutdown. Public panic caused the tactic to fail. Too bad> It would have been better to face the spending issue then than now with the situation of deficit and debt worse.
Bob K| 3.6.13 @ 11:21AM
SEQUESTER THIS!
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=218374
PolishKnight| 3.6.13 @ 2:04PM
What the sequester fiasco demonstrates is the relationship Obama and his minions have with the public. If their expenses are cut by 5%, and this is in increases in spending (not current projected spending), they go for the jugular and will cut the most personal or essential services or stuff they don't want to do in the first place. So instead of cutting back on staffing at DC offices, they delay travelers at airports.
On the other hand, for years they've been getting 5% increases overall for decades and what has the public gotten for it? Roads with potholes, bridges crumbling, space programs relying upon Russian rockets, poor educational performance, etc. while the office staff bloats.
It's like the way one of Tony Sopranos minions responded to a customer complaint about garbage collection: He said they didn't pick up his trash that week. So they gave him double his trash back. That's what he got for complaining. Just be happy they bother to EVER show up and don't take ALL your money away.
Bill8472| 3.6.13 @ 4:44PM
Two days after sequestration kicked in, the stock market hit its highest level since before the recession began.
It shows how hard the economy is struggling to bring prosperity to all of us, and also how hard the government is working to hold that economic growth back.
cicero| 3.6.13 @ 5:18PM
So, Obama has already convinced the public and the Republicans that it will be necessary to raise the debt ceiling? That was no great achievement. After all, he convinced 51% of the citizens voting in the last election to vote for him. The boobocracy reigns supreme. Not only that, but 4 million Republican voters stayed home and pouted because Romney was not their favorite to win the nomination. The only chance we will have of reegaining this country is if Obama, Biden, Pelosi, and Reid all break their necks falling off their bar stools, laughing at the country who has put them in power. Or maybe they will drown in the plunder they are wallowing in. Fat chance, eh?
Pecos Pete| 3.6.13 @ 5:33PM
If Hugo could accumulate $2 billion, I can't imagine how much has been siphoned off in the USA with multi-trillion $ spending over the past 6 years.
JD| 3.6.13 @ 9:43PM
It's Orwell's Ministry of Truth in action. Right is wrong, and wrong is right.
Witness CNN's recent article about the surrogate mother who refused to abort "Baby S" - chock full of reader comments condemning the woman for "cruelly playing God" by NOT slaughtering her baby.
So too, they speak of "cuts" that "harm the economy". But they're not talking about tax increases, which truly harm the economy by truly taking money out of the economy. No, they're talking about spending cuts necessary to AVOID tax increases - they think THOSE are "cuts" to the economy! How backwards!
hrgfue | 3.7.13 @ 7:56PM
Thank you for your New post on that site.which is the best blog for us.we are enjoy it and will show them to everyone.
Ralph Novy| 3.9.13 @ 10:18PM
My word.
Do you not have at least SOME little shred of honesty/intelligence/decency in you?
What a filthy, totally idiotic screachy screed this was!
Go off for a while and rethink what it means to be a decent human being, eh?
Sheesh.