A reason for him to travel to Israel next month.
One of the most distinguishing features of President Obama’s foreign policy has been its visceral hostility towards the State of Israel.
The Obama Administration has excluded Israel from counter-terrorism meetings despite its expertise in counter-terrorism measures to assuage the Arab and Muslim world.
In another move to assuage the Arab and Muslim world, the Obama Administration refuses to identify Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Obama has personally called for Israel to give up land to the Palestinians based on its pre-1967 borders.
The Obama Administration has been harsher in his criticism of Israel building houses in Jerusalem than of Iran building a nuclear bomb. It has consistently demanded Israel stop building homes as a precondition to the negotiations with Palestinians. Call it a red line. Yet when it comes to Iran, the Obama Administration has no red lines.
Obama criticized Israel for not making “bold gestures” concerning peace with the Palestinians. Yet where are the bold gestures by Palestinians to stop honoring terrorists who murder Jewish civilians or to stop printing textbooks which incite hatred against Jews as a precondition for negotiations?
Commenting on the expansion of so-called settlements just last month Obama said with his usual condescension, “Israel doesn’t know what its own best interests are.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sharply responded in an interview:
No one decides for the citizens of Israel. I think that President Obama knows that the ones determining Israel’s vital interests are the citizens of Israel, and they will be the ones to choose who will protect those interests in the best possible way.
Then there’s his appointment of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense. The man who said, “The Jewish lobby intimidates a lot of people up here.”
Yet when Obama makes his first state visit to the Jewish State next month, he will be bestowed with Israel’s newly created Presidential Medal of Distinction.
I kid you not.
Yet Israeli President Shimon Peres is doing exactly that. The former Israeli Prime Minister explained:
Barack Obama is a true friend of the State of Israel, and has been since the beginning of his public life. As president of the United States of America, he has stood with Israel in times of crisis. During his time as president he has made a unique contribution to the security of the State of Israel, both through further strengthening the strategic cooperation between the countries and through the joint development of technology to defend against rockets and terrorism.
Peres’ statement contradicts a 2010 statement by Michael Oren, Israel’s Ambassador to the United States. Oren said, “Israel’s ties with the United States are in their worst crisis since 1975… a crisis of historic proportions.” If Peres considers Obama to be a true friend of Israel then I guess we can expect Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, Mohamed Morsi of Egypt and Syria’s Bashar Assad (if he is still in power) to receive presidential medals from Israel. Barack Obama deserves Israel’s Presidential Medal of Distinction about as much as he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. At the very minimum, Peres is diminishing the value of Israel’s highest civilian honor. With friends like Obama who needs enemies?
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?