April 12, 2013 | 163 comments
January 23, 2013 | 69 comments
January 22, 2013 | 30 comments
January 17, 2013 | 68 comments
November 29, 2012 | 268 comments
Less protection may mean fewer concussions.
(Page 2 of 2)
The 49ers’ veteran starting quarterback Alex Smith had led his team to the top of its division and was second in the league in QB rating when he suffered a concussion in mid-season. During his league-mandated sit down, back-up Colin Kaepernick took over the starting role, and Smith rode the bench for the rest of the season as Kaepernick catapulted to stardom.
When it was revealed that New York Jets Quarterback Greg McElroy had hid a concussion suffered in a game late in the season, nobody was surprised, least of all his teammates. As the New York Daily News reported, “Every Jets player the Daily News spoke with and chose to comment said he would consider hiding his concussion.”
The NFL stands for “National Football League” but it also stands for “Not For Long” because any player unwilling to play through pain and risk long-term injury for a chance at short-term success won’t remain in the league for very long.
There is little evidence that today’s helmets prevent concussions. In a 2011 review of the academic literature on helmets and concussions titled “Helmets and Mouth Guards: The Role of Personal Equipment in Preventing Sports-Related Concussions,” researchers found that “the hard-shelled helmet… may not be best suited for protecting against the lower forces that also include a component of rotational acceleration, which are believed to cause the majority of concussions.”
The authors concluded: “At this point, there is little evidence supporting the use of specific helmets or mouth guards to prevent concussions outside of specific sports such as cycling, skiing, and snowboarding.”
A better solution may be for players not to wear helmets at all. A study found that the Australian Football League, whose players don’t wear helmets or any other padding but do nearly as much hitting, reported 25% fewer head injuries than NFL players.
Another idea would be for players to wear leather helmets, as players did in the first half of the last century.
The hard-shelled helmets (made mostly of hard plastic with some metal and rubber) in current usage are great for preventing skull fractures and brain bleeds, but they don’t do much to prevent concussions.
A 2011 study published in the journal Neurosurgery simulated on-field collisions for both kinds of helmets and found that the century-old leather helmets were at least as good as the newfangled kind in protecting against concussion from routine football hits.
Over time, getting rid of helmets or using leather helmets would change players’ behavior. Because helmets are the hardest things on a player’s body, they make for convenient weapons, and players routinely turn themselves into human missiles by launching themselves helmet-first into ball carriers.
The hard-shelled helmets give players a false sense of security. They make them think they are protected from injury, which encourages them to play recklessly. As Troy Aikman, who retired after suffering eight concussions, has written:
I’ve said the best way to eliminate head injuries is to take away helmets. Players would be a lot less willing to jump in and stick their heads in if their noggins weren’t protected. I used to say that tongue-in-cheek. But I’m starting to believe that’s a pretty good idea.
It’s similar to the logic that explains why more access to birth control sometimes leads to more unintended pregnancies. In both cases, the “protection” gives people an illusion of invulnerability, which often leads to more and more reckless behavior. Just as there is no such thing as safe sex, there is no such thing as safe headfirst tackling.
Without modern helmets, players would be forced to tackle properly, with their knees bent, chests up, and, most importantly, heads up, and generally to be more careful on the field.
As a bonus, without those big bulky helmets, players would become more recognizable to fans. They’d be more marketable for the league and more attractive as endorsers. Given the sway that money has in football, it is this last byproduct of ditching helmets that gives me hope that the idea will at least be considered.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?