June 18, 2013 | 105 comments
June 13, 2013 | 54 comments
June 11, 2013 | 215 comments
June 6, 2013 | 91 comments
June 4, 2013 | 55 comments
Hannity special spotlights Extractor Economics: America’s real privileged few as economy shrinks.
(Page 5 of 5)
Simply put, it’s because of people like Bill Moyers and his old boss LBJ, and Russ Feingold when he was a Senator. Not to mention today the entire Obama administration.
The working principle of liberalism is to create program after program after program (like LBJ’s beloved 207), then hiring privileged and expensive bureaucrats, then putting them in big concrete boxes along the Potomac.
There can be no possible other end to all of this than to create exactly what Hannity, Bannon, and Schweizer showcased the other night: Boom Town.
Will there be a Boom Town in your neighborhood outside of the Washington Beltway?
Not with all your money being sucked — sorry — extracted to keep the Washington Boom Town afloat in excellent wine, and riding in Lamborghinis.
Yesterday, the news was out from the Commerce Department: the economy shrinks.
This is what happens when you take money from your pocket and send it to Washington.
Extractor Economics is doing its thing.
In the immortal words of Gomer Pyle: “Sur…prise, sur…prise, sur…prise.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?