Joseph
Anton: A Memoir
By Salman Rushdie
Random House, 636
pages, $30)
Like British pounds, British knighthoods have lost much of their
value in the last few decades. In the halcyon, pre-decimal 1950s,
one pound was equal to nearly three American dollars; receiving a
knighthood in those days meant you were Churchill or Attlee. Now
when I write for a British magazine, I ignore the libra and tell
myself I’m being paid in dollars instead: by the time I cover my
bank’s wire fee, I might as well be. As for today’s parfit gentil
knights, take your pick: Sir Elton Hercules John, Sir Michael
Philip Jagger, Sir Richard Charles Nicolas Branson, Sir Ahmed
Salman Rushdie.
Still, I join the Mayor of London in objecting to Rushdie’s 2007
knighthood on strictly literary grounds. If “service to literature”
is now sufficient for such honors, surely Britain can do better.
The official honors committee who decides these things — one can
be fairly certain that Her Majesty does not trouble her aging eyes
with The Satanic Verses any more than she pesters her
royal ears with The Joshua Tree — might start with A.N.
Wilson. Anyway, it is better for them to err on the side of
exclusivity: T.S. Eliot, the greatest poet and literary critic of
the 20th century, was never offered a knighthood, and Anthony
Powell, ever-perceptive, knew which way the wind was blowing and
turned one down.
My opposition to Rushdie’s knighthood puts me in a somewhat
uncomfortable position, namely, that of having to admit that the
enemy of my enemies is not my friend. Islamic fascists, from
Khomeini to Cat Stevens, have called for Rushdie’s death: but what
boots it? The Enchantress of Florence is still
one of the most tedious pieces of fiction I have ever read, and
pretending otherwise would be as silly as praising Innocence of
Muslims. No rest for the wicked, I say, and no affirmative
literary action for writers whom the mullahs dislike.
Joseph Anton: A Memoir — could there be a more risibly
Obamesque gesture than selecting the first names of Europe’s two
greatest writers of short fiction for one’s nom de guerre?
— runs to well over 500 pages of overwrought third-person prose.
Flowery, some might call it, but if these are flowers, they are
Amorphophallus titanum: formless, gigantic, colorful,
foul-smelling. (There is even an overabundance of exclamation
points!) From Hobbes to Henry Adams, third-person autobiography has
occasionally been done well, but it requires a sense of both
detachment and irony, neither of which Rushdie seems to possess.
Instead, throughout the Joseph Anton, he is smug,
self-indulgent, dropsical. The book is filled with the passages of
the sort that only a wealthy, more or less non-introspective sort
of person can produce (“But the world’s unkindness was never far
away”). Name-dropping:
Bill Clinton was even bigger and pinker than he had
anticipated…
They went out to eat with Jay McInery…
Willie Nelson was there!…
They had dinner at Antonia Fraser and Harold Pinter’s house…
Almost at once there was a call from Fiona Millar, Cherie
Blair’s right-hand person…
Renée Zellweger stuck to her English accent all the time, even
off-camera…
He had lunch with Christopher Hitchens and Christopher’s big fan
Warren Beatty at the Beverley Hills Hotel…
and self-aggrandizement:
It was revealed that he had been awarded the Austrian State
Prize for European Literature two years
earlier [italics Rushdie’s]…
Pecos Pete| 1.8.13 @ 8:09AM
As Albert (the Don Dom) would say: "Huh?"
Albert Constantine Jr.| 1.8.13 @ 9:55AM
I followed along on this one a little better, and particularly enjoyed this nugget:
"makes a point of unplugging the wah-wah pedal"
I used "wah-wah" pedal on the disco point on the thread from Jeffrey Lord's article before I saw young Mr. Walther's use of it here. What are the odds that such a reference could appear twice in the same day on the same site independent of one another (probably less than the likelihood that "orotund" and "fescennine" will appear in the same paragraph here again)?
Kingofthenet| 1.8.13 @ 10:05AM
I've come to the conclusion , Salman Rushdie is SO intelligent, he makes little sense to mortal beings like the author and myself.
Tom Kyba| 1.8.13 @ 12:00PM
Kind of like Obama yes?
TLP| 1.8.13 @ 3:53PM
Yeah.
He's a F*%&ing; Genius.
Occam's Tool| 1.8.13 @ 1:41PM
Rushdie is a pompous git who bites the hand that feeds him.
Meanwhile, how could you not expect Burgess' NOT to be obscene? His works taught me the definition of "catamite," as in, "Cheesehead Jack is a Jihadist catamite," made all the more humorous in the knowledge that Cheesehead is actually a doddering old man. He wrote "The Wanting Seed!"
Sir Al Roker| 1.8.13 @ 2:22PM
Hey,
I just pooped my pants. And it felt great!!!!!!!!!!!
Joe D.| 1.8.13 @ 3:42PM
Wow, what a bunch of wining!!!
Job| 1.8.13 @ 7:03PM
hmm as always the press is still reading the cliff notes no one's ever figured out the truth.
pompous ass asside...Rushdies original sin was said to be blasphemy with the insinuation that Mohammed's scribe penned much of the Koran but his chapter in the Satanic verses on "the Iman in exile" was hilarious and without a doubt the reason for the call for his head on a stick by same Imam.