April 22, 2013 | 4 comments
January 17, 2013 | 19 comments
December 21, 2012 | 68 comments
September 5, 2012 | 75 comments
June 19, 2012 | 6 comments
The term is synonymous with a Notre Dame linebacker who came out of President Obama’s school.
Before World War II, college football did not allow free substitution of players. So, players played on both defense and offense. During World War II, with the best players in the armed services, the football rules were altered to allow unlimited substitution, permitting coaches to take advantage of the particular skills of the players. In 1945 the University of Michigan was the first to exploit the rule by employing the “two-platoon system” in which some players played only defense and some only offense.
This unlimited substitution rule that allowed the two-platoon system was repealed in 1954 but re-enacted for the 1965 season. It has remained in place since that season. And now we speak even of a third platoon — the “special teams” unit.
In the succeeding years, various rules have been changed that have unwittingly or wittingly promoted offensive scoring. These include rules on how quarterbacks are treated, how offensive linemen may use their hands, how much contact may occur between the defense and receivers. And, it is claimed that some college coaches place their best athletes on offense.
It was into this environment that a 2009 graduate of the private Punahou School on Hawai’i (the same school from which President Obama graduated in 1979) joined the football team at the University of Notre Dame to play linebacker, a position on defense: Manti Te’o (pronounced “man-tie tay-oh”). You may have heard of him in connection with the Heisman Trophy Award made on December 8 in which he placed second. He finished with 321 first-place votes and 1,706 points — the most ever by a defensive player in college football history and the second-highest for a runner-up.
The Heisman is considered the most prestigious in college football. Although it is colloquially regarded as being made to the most outstanding college football player, the specific wording is “the outstanding college football player whose performance best exhibits the pursuit of excellence with integrity.” Te’o made news because there have been few defensive player Heisman finalists since the defensive/offensive split of 1965, indeed since the Award’s conception in 1935. Only two defensive players have won the Heisman: Syracuse’s Ernie Davis in 1961 who played offense and defense, and Michigan’s Charles Woodson in 1997. No lineman has ever received the award. Given that record, the Heisman is de facto an award to an offensive skills player (quarterback, running back, receiver, tight end).
Given all of the hype surrounding the Heisman, it is easy to overlook all of the other awards made to college football players. And here, the star of Te’o shines ever so brightly. Based on the position he played, Te’o was eligible to receive 13 awards, the Heisman being just one of them. He won ten! (I can hear President Obama exclaiming, even about a fellow alumnus, that it is not “fair” that one person should win so many, that the accolades should be distributed more fairly.) The ten he won are:
Admittedly, some of these awards were established fairly recently. Nonetheless, no other player at any position has ever received more than five major awards in college football history.
(Te’o was eligible for, but did not receive, two additional awards: the Campbell Trophy for top scholar-player (for which he was one of 15 finalists) and the Disney Spirit Award for most inspirational player or team (it went to a 29-year-old former Green Beret playing for the University of Texas, Nate Boyer). Te’o was not eligible for: the Doak Walker Award to the best running back; the Davey O’Brien Award to the best quarterback, the Johnny Unitas Golden Arm Award, the Fred Biletnikoff Award to best wide receiver, the Johnny Mack Award to best tight end, the Outland Trophy to best interior lineman, the Rimington Trophy to best center, the Jim Thorpe Award to best defensive back, the Lou Groza Award to best place-kicker, the Ray Guy Award to best punter, the Ted Hendricks Award to best defensive end, and the Paul Hornung Award to best versatile player.)
It should be noted that these awards are based on a single season, not an entire college football career (but of course it is impossible to ignore a player’s entire career). And some of the awards are based on off-field community, academic, and other activities.
What did Te’o do on the field? In the 2012 season as a senior, Te’o had 103 total tackles (solo and assist); 5.5 of them were tackles for loss (TFL) of 19 yards. He had 1.5 sacks for a loss of 13 yards. He missed two tackles all season. He had 7 interceptions, recovered two fumbles, and hurried passers that resulted in two interceptions.
Okay, how does this compare to anyone else this season?
Tackles: Te’o is ranked 31 in the percentage of tackles he made compared to his team. Among top 10 defenses this year, he is ranked 4. For individual tackles as a percentage of total plays, Te’o is ranked 24 in the country. Among top 10 defenses, he is ranked third.
Turnovers: His nine turnovers are tied for the lead in the FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision schools). Interceptions: His 7 interceptions tied him for third among all defenders in the FBS. Among linebackers, he led the FBS and they were the most by any FBS linebacker since 2001. Arguably, he is the most improved linebacker this season since he had no interceptions in his college games before this season.
How does Te’o compare at Notre Dame? Tackles: His next best teammate this season had 3 fewer tackles per game. In his career, Te’o had 427 total tackles (solos and assists). This places him third all-time behind Bob Crable (521, 1978–81) and Bob Golic (479, 1975–78). Only Te’o and Crable had 100-plus tackles in three consecutive seasons. Interceptions: Te’o has the Notre Dame record for interceptions by a linebacker in a single season.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?