Meanwhile, William F. Buckley Jr. had launched National
Review in 1955. He had heard of Rusher. They met over drinks
one day in 1956. By early 1957, Rusher had been offered the job of
publisher at the fledgling magazine, which had no visible means of
support other than the Buckley family. What it did have was plenty
of intellectual stimulation. Titans of the conservative
intellectual fraternity, James Burnham, Frank Meyer, and others,
found this a congenial place to do their work.
Rusher thought the offer irresistible. Buckley, with his
ever-present sense of humor, self-confidence, quick mind, and
competitive spirit, ran a very informal office where ideas and
opinions ran freely. Although Rusher always deferred to him (“It
was Bill’s magazine”), he was always free to speak his mind, and
did.
All at the magazine argued about the best ways to advance the
principles of conservatism, but Rusher brought an additional
dimension: practical knowledge of the world of politics. Buckley’s
sister Priscilla, who was also an officer at the magazine, said of
him, “Bill (Rusher) knew a great deal more about the inside of
politics than most of the rest of us did, and it was much more
important to him.”
Rusher became the yang to Buckley’s yin. Buckley, using every
forum and medium he could, concentrated on the exposition of
ideas—big and challenging ideas. Rusher shared his philosophy but
concentrated on the political world of here and now. He worked with
elected politicians, candidates, and conservative organizations to
promote their principles and apply them to electoral politics. His
influence on the activists of the conservative movement cannot be
understated, and they aren’t in this book.
Not all of Rusher’s ideas to expand the movement bore fruit.
After the disasters of 1974—Watergate and the Republican drubbing
in the fall congressional elections—he put a great deal of energy
into proposing a new third party, an explicitly conservative party.
He tried to persuade Ronald Reagan to lead such a party. Reagan,
however, mindful of the fate of previous third-party movements,
opted to work within the Republican Party (he soon gave a speech in
which he called for the party to put forth ideas in “bold colors,
not pale pastels”).
Rusher took this disappointment with good grace and proceeded to
support Reagan’s presidential campaigns in 1976 and 1980. Rusher
saw Reagan as a man who would carry out his program if elected.
Thus, Reagan’s victory in 1980 was also Rusher’s. Many of the
conservative ideas for which he had been working for years could
now become realities in the form of public policy.
From 1957 until he retired as publisher in 1988, Bill Rusher
served as ambassador for National Review, as a skilled
debater on television, and as a syndicated newspaper columnist (he
wrote his last column at age 85). He was an intellectual who was
also a political tactician and strategist.
Retiring to San Francisco, Rusher remained active with think
tanks and advocacy groups, and as a mentor to aspiring conservative
politicians. Author Frisk has given us a well-rounded portrait of
this singular man and his era.
Al Adab| 12.27.12 @ 11:43AM
No comments? One of the founders of the Conservative Movement and we cannot take to to thank him?
For many years we have fought the good fight. If we made mistakes and if we have failed, then our grandchildren deserve an apology from us all. We had a chance, but they will suffer under a new dark age of tyranny.
Al Adab| 12.27.12 @ 11:45AM
take the time to thank him.
C. Vernon Crisler | 12.27.12 @ 1:47PM
I have to admit, I never really liked Rusher all that much. I suppose it's just that some people are naturally photogenic and naturally connect with people, but Rusher did not seem to have that talent (at least on TV). However, not everyone can have the TV eloquence or charm of a Bill Buckley or Ronald Reagan, or have the intellectual weight of a Leo Strauss or historical insight of a Harry Jaffa. Rusher's talent, as intimated above, was behind the scenes, dealing with organizational nuts and bolts, the unglamorous side of political life.
Likeable or unlikeable, he certainly deserves our gratitude, especially for his prophetic belief that we need to form a conservative party -- which we will no doubt have to do sometime in the near future, given the pale pastels of the current Republican Party.
Rhoetus| 12.27.12 @ 9:08PM
Who founded the "Conservative Movement"? It depends on who you ask; while I admire Wm. F Buckley Jr I do think that he and National Review are arrogant to claim that they were the “be all and end all” of Conservatism. While I give credit to L Brent Bozell Jr in guiding my understanding of individualism (for ghost writing) in “The Conscience of a Conservative” by Barry M Goldwater, the Buckley crowd was not my only influence.
Michele San Pietro| 1.6.13 @ 9:46AM
I saw him several times on CNN in the eighties, he was simply great and in debates he never hesitated to send liberals and communists to hell!