The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Buy the Book

The Great Bill Rusher

An excellent portrait of National Review’s founding publisher.

(Page 2 of 2)

Meanwhile, William F. Buckley Jr. had launched National Review in 1955. He had heard of Rusher. They met over drinks one day in 1956. By early 1957, Rusher had been offered the job of publisher at the fledgling magazine, which had no visible means of support other than the Buckley family. What it did have was plenty of intellectual stimulation. Titans of the conservative intellectual fraternity, James Burnham, Frank Meyer, and others, found this a congenial place to do their work.

Rusher thought the offer irresistible. Buckley, with his ever-present sense of humor, self-confidence, quick mind, and competitive spirit, ran a very informal office where ideas and opinions ran freely. Although Rusher always deferred to him (“It was Bill’s magazine”), he was always free to speak his mind, and did.

All at the magazine argued about the best ways to advance the principles of conservatism, but Rusher brought an additional dimension: practical knowledge of the world of politics. Buckley’s sister Priscilla, who was also an officer at the magazine, said of him, “Bill (Rusher) knew a great deal more about the inside of politics than most of the rest of us did, and it was much more important to him.”

Rusher became the yang to Buckley’s yin. Buckley, using every forum and medium he could, concentrated on the exposition of ideas—big and challenging ideas. Rusher shared his philosophy but concentrated on the political world of here and now. He worked with elected politicians, candidates, and conservative organizations to promote their principles and apply them to electoral politics. His influence on the activists of the conservative movement cannot be understated, and they aren’t in this book.

Not all of Rusher’s ideas to expand the movement bore fruit. After the disasters of 1974—Watergate and the Republican drubbing in the fall congressional elections—he put a great deal of energy into proposing a new third party, an explicitly conservative party. He tried to persuade Ronald Reagan to lead such a party. Reagan, however, mindful of the fate of previous third-party movements, opted to work within the Republican Party (he soon gave a speech in which he called for the party to put forth ideas in “bold colors, not pale pastels”).

Rusher took this disappointment with good grace and proceeded to support Reagan’s presidential campaigns in 1976 and 1980. Rusher saw Reagan as a man who would carry out his program if elected. Thus, Reagan’s victory in 1980 was also Rusher’s. Many of the conservative ideas for which he had been working for years could now become realities in the form of public policy.

From 1957 until he retired as publisher in 1988, Bill Rusher served as ambassador for National Review, as a skilled debater on television, and as a syndicated newspaper columnist (he wrote his last column at age 85). He was an intellectual who was also a political tactician and strategist.

Retiring to San Francisco, Rusher remained active with think tanks and advocacy groups, and as a mentor to aspiring conservative politicians. Author Frisk has given us a well-rounded portrait of this singular man and his era.

Page:   12

About the Author

Peter Hannaford was closely associated for a number of years with the late President Reagan, beginning in the California Governor’s office. His latest book is Presidential Retreats.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (5) |

Al Adab| 12.27.12 @ 11:43AM

No comments? One of the founders of the Conservative Movement and we cannot take to to thank him?

For many years we have fought the good fight. If we made mistakes and if we have failed, then our grandchildren deserve an apology from us all. We had a chance, but they will suffer under a new dark age of tyranny.

Al Adab| 12.27.12 @ 11:45AM

take the time to thank him.

C. Vernon Crisler | 12.27.12 @ 1:47PM

I have to admit, I never really liked Rusher all that much. I suppose it's just that some people are naturally photogenic and naturally connect with people, but Rusher did not seem to have that talent (at least on TV). However, not everyone can have the TV eloquence or charm of a Bill Buckley or Ronald Reagan, or have the intellectual weight of a Leo Strauss or historical insight of a Harry Jaffa. Rusher's talent, as intimated above, was behind the scenes, dealing with organizational nuts and bolts, the unglamorous side of political life.

Likeable or unlikeable, he certainly deserves our gratitude, especially for his prophetic belief that we need to form a conservative party -- which we will no doubt have to do sometime in the near future, given the pale pastels of the current Republican Party.

Rhoetus| 12.27.12 @ 9:08PM

Who founded the "Conservative Movement"? It depends on who you ask; while I admire Wm. F Buckley Jr I do think that he and National Review are arrogant to claim that they were the “be all and end all” of Conservatism. While I give credit to L Brent Bozell Jr in guiding my understanding of individualism (for ghost writing) in “The Conscience of a Conservative” by Barry M Goldwater, the Buckley crowd was not my only influence.

Michele San Pietro| 1.6.13 @ 9:46AM

I saw him several times on CNN in the eighties, he was simply great and in debates he never hesitated to send liberals and communists to hell!

More Articles by Peter Hannaford

More Articles From Buy the Book

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/12/27/the-great-bill-rusher

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

From the Obama Ministry of Truth

Ben Stein | 5.21.13

IRS Union Chief Stonewalls

Jeffrey Lord | 5.21.13

Wimps Versus Barbarians

Thomas Sowell | 5.21.13

Damage Control for Dummies

Matt Purple | 5.22.13

Anyone Still Believe Me?

Aaron Goldstein | 5.21.13

ADVERTISEMENT