Complaints about Christmas commercialization get tiresome.
Barrett Duke of the Southern Baptist D.C. office responds in a
recent column with a robust defense of America’s holiday, for all
its faults.
Christmas helps to employ millions of people, in America and
globally, about which upper crust critics of commercialization
often forget or are indifferent. But “there is more upside to the
commercialization of Christmas than that,” Duke notes. “During
Christmas, the Gospel message is plastered across America. The very
word ‘Christmas’ reminds people of Jesus Christ. Clearly, they
aren’t getting the whole story, but it’s better than nothing. It
gives us a good starting place to talk about all that Christmas
means.”
Duke also cites the moral uplift and even evangelistic outreach
of Christmas music, about which I was reminded earlier the other
evening, sitting in a Chicago bakery, listening to “The Little
Drummer Boy.” And Duke commends the “mood-altering” atmospherics
that emphasize generosity to friends and strangers. “At least for a
while, there is a little more peace on earth in some people’s lives
and across the nation,” he rightly observes. In our fallen world,
such moments, even in passing, should be appreciated.
“I wouldn’t give up the free press the Gospel gets, the Gospel
seeds that are planted, or the spirit of goodwill that is generated
as businesses compete for our dollars,” Duke concludes. “I would
rather join the Apostle Paul who declared, ‘Whether in pretense or
in truth Christ is proclaimed, and in this I rejoice.’”
The spread of Christmas globally, even in commercialized form,
is mostly good news, not just for Christianity, but for economic
and political gain especially among the poor and oppressed. Tyrants
and kleptocrats fear Christmas as a subtle transcendent challenge
to their own power. In recent years Christmas with all its
commercialized paraphernalia has gained a following in China, where
it still lacks official status. Mao Zedong and his Communist
Gestapo likely never dreamed, as they shut down the churches and
chased off the missionaries, that Christmas lights and trees would
one day festoon many Chinese cities.
As noted in the Atlantic last year in a piece by Helen
Gao, some Chinese communists and intellectuals still resent
Christmas:
There is one thing that China’s Christmas and America’s have in
common: both are widely lamented as over-commercialized. While some
in America fight to resurface the holiday’s spiritual significance,
Christmas-bashers in China warn against allowing Western culture to
contaminate Chinese civilization. Shortly before Christmas in 2006,
ten post-doctoral students from Peking University, Tsinghua
University, and other elite colleges penned an open letter asking
Chinese people to boycott Christmas and resist the invasion of
“western soft power.” They warned, “[Christmas celebrators in
China] are doing what western missionaries dreamed to do but didn’t
succeed in doing 100 years ago.” The letter added, “Chinese people
need to treat Christmas cautiously, and support the dominance of
our own culture.”
Christmas, even in diluted, commercialized form, proclaims a
liberating, universal message that is subversive for many. The
market economies that facilitate it lift up the once poor and
challenge the status quo, which both Chinese communists and snooty
American critics often resent. I was in New York last week, in all
its stunning Christmas glory. Manhattan was aglow and bustling. I
heard a Christian speaker lament how Manhattan had become a huge
shopping mall, compared to the gritty edginess of past decades. He
almost seemed nostalgic for the crime, squalor, and filth that
characterized New York in the 1970s. I bet few actual New York
residents feel the same way. They seem to prefer the restaurants
and shopping of today compared to the muggings and red light
districts of then.
My taxi driver to Union Station in Washington, D.C. was 78 years
old and driving a cab in D.C. since 1954. As we approached the
terminal, beautifully decorated for Christmas, he recalled coming
from a farm in then harshly segregated South Carolina. The nation’s
capital itself was only desegregated in 1953. He and his brothers
now own homes in D.C. worth about $600,000 each, thanks to the
enriching gentrification of D.C., similar to much of New York.
Likely his father, who worked at a mill and died young, never
envisioned his sons owning half million dollar houses within miles
of the White House and U.S. Capitol.
Commercialization, even of Christmas, can be good news for many,
especially those who need it most. The Baby at Bethlehem came to
bring salvation and redemption from sin. But He also brought life
more abundant for the impoverished and oppressed. His Church is
growing exponentially around the world in places lie China. And
that growth is accompanied by and is itself encouraging prosperity
through market economies rescuing hundreds of millions from chronic
poverty, creating a vast new middle class. This economic miracle is
not the Good News, but it is certainly important good
news, for which at Christmas time we can be most grateful.
PolishKnight| 12.24.12 @ 9:51AM
Many puritannical Christians I know criticized the Catholic church for embracing, or subverting, pagan rituals and holidays. Christmas is one of them. Historians think that Christ was most likely born in spring or early summer but those pesky, drunken European winter solstice celebrations with bringing trees indoors had to be subverted. This is why New Years is still a drunken romp.
Ironically, it was best for both of them: We continue to enjoy the best of both celebrations. Regarding materialism: my wife and I buy one present for each other, for fun, but otherwise it's about enjoying a good meal with family and friends and putting up the lights and decorations to share in the holiday with neighbors. We don't go crazy on black Friday.
Mark30339| 12.24.12 @ 11:02AM
This is post has an excellent tone. Christmas is all about finding common ground and seeing the cup half full.
BackToBasics| 12.24.12 @ 1:46PM
Celebrating Jesus as a newborn baby and then later humbly dying on the cross runs counter to power-hungry individuals and leaders so prevalent today and throughout history. It is so welcomed by those who know and love and worship Him.
Al Adab| 12.24.12 @ 1:55PM
See todays' WSJ: In Hoc Anno Domini
C. Vernon Crisler | 12.24.12 @ 3:58PM
Yes, I would agree that complaining about commercialization of Christmas is tiresome. Didn't we learn that from Charlie Brown?
However, Christmas does not really provide an increase of employment. The fallacy here is Keynesian, in thinking that spending creates jobs. What really happens at Christmas is that spending is shifted from some to others. A good example is Black Friday. On this day, the retail stores are overflowing, and yet at the same time the supermarkets are empty. One person's gain in employment is another's loss. The same thing happens during the Christmas season.
One of the things that is so hard for people to understand is that it is not spending but saving that brings about real prosperity. Loans based on savings are the only way to increase real wealth in an economy, and hence bring about a net increase in jobs. That way it's not merely shifting a given body of wealth around, but actually creating new wealth.
So yes celebrate Christmas, but it is not the solution to the Obama Recession. Come January or February, it will be back to dwindling business confidence and worse unemployment to come.
holmegm| 12.26.12 @ 2:11PM
Yes, when you think about it, it's hard not to enjoy watching the secular world work so hard to pretend that it is *not* celebrating the birth of Jesus with a big festival :)
Happy "holiday", nudge nudge ...
Jim Adcox| 12.26.12 @ 4:30PM
The worldwide celebration of Christmas, be it secular, saintly, or otherwise, calls to mind the verse, Luke 19: 40: "And he answered and said unto them, 'I tell you that, if these [disciples, being shushed by Pharisees] should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out.'"