The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Buy the Book

Remixing the Melting Pot

Tom Wolfe paints Miami red.

(Page 2 of 2)

IN THE MANNERS NOVEL TRADITION, and in many ways harkening back to Thackeray’s The Book of Snobs, Back to Blood is rich in secondary characters who personify the pretensions, vices, and excesses of Wolfe’s Miami—a layer of people with “pride in status but no pride in function,” as Lionel Trilling, defining snobbery, once put it. Wolfe’s “culture strivers,” with no real-world role to play, are superficial and unpleasant and often repulsive people sitting atop a sharply shifting social structure, with no sense of the tectonic changes grinding just beneath them.

Among the most repulsive: Maurice Fleischmann, a billionaire plagued with clusters of herpes sores and obsessed with sex, who is encouraged as part of his treatment to watch pornography and attend showings and auctions of pornographic art by Dr. Norman Lewis, a psychiatrist with an unnerving laugh (irritating even on paper) who describes his work this way: “I have the hopeless obligation to tell people there’s no such thing as addiction, medically. They don’t want to believe that! They’d much rather believeaahhhHAHAHA Hock hock hock hock—believe they’re sick—kahHAHock hock hock hock!

But they are sick, of course, and as his nurse Magdalena Otero comes to realize, there’s no advantage in trying to cure them. As Dr. Lewis takes her with him, always in the company of the repulsive Fleischman, to pornographic shows, she comes to realize that Lewis is actually keeping his richest patient in a permanent state of arousal, in order to gain entrée into the world of big money and influence, where he thinks he belongs, and where he can harvest new patients.

In Back to Blood, connoisseurs of pornography mingle with connoisseurs of forged modern art, their pretensions and perversions feeding bottom-dwellers like Dr. Lewis and art forgers, with pornography arousing counterfeit emotions, onanistic pleasure without purpose or ultimate satisfaction, and with the modern art coveted by Wolfe’s strivers devoid of any aesthetic substance or artistic integrity—or for that matter, any real skill—and thus easily forged.

Magdalena, who at the beginning of the novel had been Nestor Comacho’s love interest, is an unusually attractive and perceptive but naïve girl who tends to live in a world of romantic fantasy. At times, she serves as a unifying strand, threading her way through the plot and subplots. And when she’s not thinking self-consciously about the impression she’s making, she can function as a silent chorus, representing simple common sense as she thinks about such matters as pornography or modern art.

Here she is, standing before a painting, seeing “two half-round shapes, one a simple black and the other one a simple white, painted on a beigey-gray background. The two shapes were separated from each other and cocked at cockeyed angles….You’d have to be a cretin to stand here actually studying this mierda….Not even the old fools who pay millions for this idiotic nonsense….are so retarded they actually look at it.”

She finally allows herself to bring the same sort of perceptiveness to bear on her relationship with Dr. Lewis, who then, along with his awful laugh, drops from our sight and hearing. But her romantic side reasserts itself, and she’s swept off her feet by Sergei Korolyov, the reigning Russian oligarch who had given millions of dollars’ worth of paintings to the Miami Art Museum. Korolyov drives her off to his penthouse, where he has his way with her, and then on the morning after gets word that his scam has been blown, and reads the account in the Herald given by the drunken forger, Igor Drukovich. (Drukovich makes fun of the Russian modernists—Malevich, Goncharova, and Kandinsky. “Does Drukovich think he could do what they’ve done? ‘Anybody could!’ he says. ‘My nephew who has a paint box and a brush could do it.”)

Korolyov makes arrangements for a getaway flight, has Drukovich disposed of (he’s found dead by Comacho at the bottom of a flight of stairs with his neck broken), and leaves Magdalena naked in his bed and Miami with the new Sergei Korolyov Museum of Art and tens of millions of dollars’ worth of forged paintings.

MAGDELENA, NOW SADDER and somewhat wiser, tries to reunite with Nestor Comacho. But in another subplot, there’s a lovely almost-fair maiden who takes great pride in her pigmentation, Ghislaine, the ladylike, light-skinned daughter of a pretentious Haitian professor of French. She’s rescued by Comacho, who apparently wins her heart, giving readers a happy ending (if Comacho can win over the snobbish father) and providing Miami the promise of further mingling of the bloods.

Smith and Comacho, the book’s real heroes, would seem to have little in common. To Comacho, Smith is “a living embodiment of a creature everybody had heard of but nobody ever met in Miami, the WASP, the white Anglo-Saxon Protestant….a classic Americano, tall, thin, pale, wearing a navy blazer, a white polo shirt, khaki pants with freshly pressed creases down the front….very proper looking….soft spoken to the point of shy.”

But although totally different externally, they both personify a distinct integrity, as does the black chief of police, the third of Wolfe’s admirable characters. All three take great pride in their work (Smith, who as a serious reporter allows nothing to get in his way, might well be modeled on the author), and each risks his career to do the right thing, and do it in the right way.

In these central characters, Tom Wolfe again gives us men in full, who in an age of extraordinary uncertainty, embody the old verities—or perhaps, more accurately, the right stuff. And no matter how our society changes, that remains the same.

Page:   12

About the Author

John R. Coyne, Jr. a former White House speech-writer, is co-author with Linda Bridges of Strictly Right: William F. Buckley Jr. and the American Conservative Movement (Wiley).

Letter to the Editor View all comments (10) |

NE-Conservative| 11.29.12 @ 8:11AM

This is a fairly good synopsis of the novel. He overstates the role of some characters but not seriously.

As a long time fan of Wolfe, I enjoyed this latest work very much. However, the work would have been significantly improved if a good editor had been allowed to pare it down. Wolfe stretches out and repeats things to distraction - unnecessarily so. That said, it's worth reading and stands well above the enormous amount of thoughtless (in every sense) novels and stories published today.

PJ| 11.29.12 @ 11:26AM

If Wolfe is at least a good writer, his work should not need more than a minimum amount of editing.

Wolfe's work is only average even compared to the crap out there but not even close to becoming a classic.

Psst- I did enjoy reading The Bonfires of the Vanities.

Alan Brooks | 11.29.12 @ 10:05PM

"The Electric Kool Ade Acid Test intoduced me to Ken Kesey and The Grateful Dead as well as Larry McMurtry."

Again, Wolfe is not conservative: no conservative would write 'The Electric Kool Aid Acid Test'.

JGW| 11.29.12 @ 9:48AM

Started reading Wolfe many years ago. I believe I've read everything he has written. This ones on my list.
Interesting where his novels can take you. The Electric Kool Ade Acid Test intoduced me to Ken Kesey and The Grateful Dead as well as Larry McMurtry.

Guimo| 11.29.12 @ 10:44AM

I just finished it and was very disappointed. Not in the same league as "Bonfire of the Vanities" or "A Man in Full." Set-piece chapters are unconvincing. Plot is weak. I'm a big Tom Wolfe fan, but this is not his best book by far.

Hardcard| 11.29.12 @ 12:08PM

Novels ? we don't need no stinkin novels. I want more kardasian reality, what's lohan doing?? who does susan rice's nails? Is barry (the one) still smoking dope?

Albert Constantine Jr.| 11.29.12 @ 6:12PM

Bonfire of the Vanities was a very good book, but depressing in how it revealed the bankrupt nature of its time 20 years ago, and showed a road map of so much wohich would get worse in the future.

LONE STAR| 11.29.12 @ 9:12PM

I saw the movie and it is really good, but way too politically incorrect....That's a compliment

Alan Brooks | 11.29.12 @ 10:03PM

Wolfe is not conservative: no conservative would write 'The Electric Kool Aid Acid Test'.

Tina B| 11.30.12 @ 2:25PM

Let's see that was, hmmm, around 40 to 45 years ago? I believe I've come a long way since then, and I am now a Conservative too. Very, in fact. And I may have been part of some acid test, somewhere, long ago. I can't remember all of the late 60s for some reason.

More Articles by John R. Coyne, Jr.

More Articles From Buy the Book

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/11/29/remixing-the-melting-pot

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

Damage Control for Dummies

Matt Purple | 5.22.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Obama’s Assault on the First Amendment

George Neumayr | 5.22.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT