IN THE MANNERS NOVEL TRADITION, and in many ways harkening back
to Thackeray’s The Book of Snobs, Back to Blood
is rich in secondary characters who personify the pretensions,
vices, and excesses of Wolfe’s Miami—a layer of people with “pride
in status but no pride in function,” as Lionel Trilling, defining
snobbery, once put it. Wolfe’s “culture strivers,” with no
real-world role to play, are superficial and unpleasant and often
repulsive people sitting atop a sharply shifting social structure,
with no sense of the tectonic changes grinding just beneath
them.
Among the most repulsive: Maurice Fleischmann, a billionaire
plagued with clusters of herpes sores and obsessed with sex, who is
encouraged as part of his treatment to watch pornography and attend
showings and auctions of pornographic art by Dr. Norman Lewis, a
psychiatrist with an unnerving laugh (irritating even on paper) who
describes his work this way: “I have the hopeless obligation to
tell people there’s no such thing as addiction, medically. They
don’t want to believe that! They’d much rather
believeaahhhHAHAHA Hock hock hock hock—believe they’re
sick—kahHAHock hock hock hock!”
But they are sick, of course, and as his nurse Magdalena Otero
comes to realize, there’s no advantage in trying to cure them. As
Dr. Lewis takes her with him, always in the company of the
repulsive Fleischman, to pornographic shows, she comes to realize
that Lewis is actually keeping his richest patient in a permanent
state of arousal, in order to gain entrée into the world of big
money and influence, where he thinks he belongs, and where he can
harvest new patients.
In Back to Blood, connoisseurs of pornography mingle
with connoisseurs of forged modern art, their pretensions and
perversions feeding bottom-dwellers like Dr. Lewis and art forgers,
with pornography arousing counterfeit emotions, onanistic pleasure
without purpose or ultimate satisfaction, and with the modern art
coveted by Wolfe’s strivers devoid of any aesthetic substance or
artistic integrity—or for that matter, any real skill—and thus
easily forged.
Magdalena, who at the beginning of the novel had been Nestor
Comacho’s love interest, is an unusually attractive and perceptive
but naïve girl who tends to live in a world of romantic fantasy. At
times, she serves as a unifying strand, threading her way through
the plot and subplots. And when she’s not thinking self-consciously
about the impression she’s making, she can function as a silent
chorus, representing simple common sense as she thinks about such
matters as pornography or modern art.
Here she is, standing before a painting, seeing “two half-round
shapes, one a simple black and the other one a simple white,
painted on a beigey-gray background. The two shapes were separated
from each other and cocked at cockeyed angles….You’d have to be a
cretin to stand here actually studying this mierda….Not
even the old fools who pay millions for this idiotic nonsense….are
so retarded they actually look at it.”
She finally allows herself to bring the same sort of
perceptiveness to bear on her relationship with Dr. Lewis, who
then, along with his awful laugh, drops from our sight and hearing.
But her romantic side reasserts itself, and she’s swept off her
feet by Sergei Korolyov, the reigning Russian oligarch who had
given millions of dollars’ worth of paintings to the Miami Art
Museum. Korolyov drives her off to his penthouse, where he has his
way with her, and then on the morning after gets word that his scam
has been blown, and reads the account in the Herald given
by the drunken forger, Igor Drukovich. (Drukovich makes fun of the
Russian modernists—Malevich, Goncharova, and Kandinsky. “Does
Drukovich think he could do what they’ve done? ‘Anybody could!’ he
says. ‘My nephew who has a paint box and a brush could do it.”)
Korolyov makes arrangements for a getaway flight, has Drukovich
disposed of (he’s found dead by Comacho at the bottom of a flight
of stairs with his neck broken), and leaves Magdalena naked in his
bed and Miami with the new Sergei Korolyov Museum of Art and tens
of millions of dollars’ worth of forged paintings.
MAGDELENA, NOW SADDER and somewhat wiser, tries to reunite with
Nestor Comacho. But in another subplot, there’s a lovely
almost-fair maiden who takes great pride in her pigmentation,
Ghislaine, the ladylike, light-skinned daughter of a pretentious
Haitian professor of French. She’s rescued by Comacho, who
apparently wins her heart, giving readers a happy ending (if
Comacho can win over the snobbish father) and providing Miami the
promise of further mingling of the bloods.
Smith and Comacho, the book’s real heroes, would seem to have
little in common. To Comacho, Smith is “a living embodiment of a
creature everybody had heard of but nobody ever met in Miami, the
WASP, the white Anglo-Saxon Protestant….a classic
Americano, tall, thin, pale, wearing a navy blazer, a
white polo shirt, khaki pants with freshly pressed creases down the
front….very proper looking….soft spoken to the point of shy.”
But although totally different externally, they both personify a
distinct integrity, as does the black chief of police, the third of
Wolfe’s admirable characters. All three take great pride in their
work (Smith, who as a serious reporter allows nothing to get in his
way, might well be modeled on the author), and each risks his
career to do the right thing, and do it in the right way.
In these central characters, Tom Wolfe again gives us men in
full, who in an age of extraordinary uncertainty, embody the old
verities—or perhaps, more accurately, the right stuff. And no
matter how our society changes, that remains the same.
NE-Conservative| 11.29.12 @ 8:11AM
This is a fairly good synopsis of the novel. He overstates the role of some characters but not seriously.
As a long time fan of Wolfe, I enjoyed this latest work very much. However, the work would have been significantly improved if a good editor had been allowed to pare it down. Wolfe stretches out and repeats things to distraction - unnecessarily so. That said, it's worth reading and stands well above the enormous amount of thoughtless (in every sense) novels and stories published today.
PJ| 11.29.12 @ 11:26AM
If Wolfe is at least a good writer, his work should not need more than a minimum amount of editing.
Wolfe's work is only average even compared to the crap out there but not even close to becoming a classic.
Psst- I did enjoy reading The Bonfires of the Vanities.
Alan Brooks | 11.29.12 @ 10:05PM
"The Electric Kool Ade Acid Test intoduced me to Ken Kesey and The Grateful Dead as well as Larry McMurtry."
Again, Wolfe is not conservative: no conservative would write 'The Electric Kool Aid Acid Test'.
JGW| 11.29.12 @ 9:48AM
Started reading Wolfe many years ago. I believe I've read everything he has written. This ones on my list.
Interesting where his novels can take you. The Electric Kool Ade Acid Test intoduced me to Ken Kesey and The Grateful Dead as well as Larry McMurtry.
Guimo| 11.29.12 @ 10:44AM
I just finished it and was very disappointed. Not in the same league as "Bonfire of the Vanities" or "A Man in Full." Set-piece chapters are unconvincing. Plot is weak. I'm a big Tom Wolfe fan, but this is not his best book by far.
Hardcard| 11.29.12 @ 12:08PM
Novels ? we don't need no stinkin novels. I want more kardasian reality, what's lohan doing?? who does susan rice's nails? Is barry (the one) still smoking dope?
Albert Constantine Jr.| 11.29.12 @ 6:12PM
Bonfire of the Vanities was a very good book, but depressing in how it revealed the bankrupt nature of its time 20 years ago, and showed a road map of so much wohich would get worse in the future.
LONE STAR| 11.29.12 @ 9:12PM
I saw the movie and it is really good, but way too politically incorrect....That's a compliment
Alan Brooks | 11.29.12 @ 10:03PM
Wolfe is not conservative: no conservative would write 'The Electric Kool Aid Acid Test'.
Tina B| 11.30.12 @ 2:25PM
Let's see that was, hmmm, around 40 to 45 years ago? I believe I've come a long way since then, and I am now a Conservative too. Very, in fact. And I may have been part of some acid test, somewhere, long ago. I can't remember all of the late 60s for some reason.