Back to Blood
By Tom Wolfe
(Little, Brown, 720 pages,
$30)
Throughout the last century, each decade was rich in novelists
whose works climbed quickly to the tops of our best-seller lists, a
time when the serious novelists were also the popular novelists:
William Dean Howells, Henry James, Edith Wharton, F. Scott
Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, Sinclair Lewis, John Dos Passos, John
Marquand, John O’Hara, James Gould Cozzens, James T. Farrell, John
Steinbeck, Edwin O’Connor, William Faulkner, Wallace Stegner, Irwin
Shaw, James Jones, Norman Mailer, Philip Roth, and Saul Bellow, to
name just a few. Some were panned, some were praised, but all were
read.
The preferred genre was the novel of manners, passed down from
Austen, Dickens, Trollope, and Thackeray; it’s to this great
tradition that Tom Wolfe is heir. And as the American novel
continues to grow smaller, painted on an ever shrinking canvas,
increasingly indwelling and careful never to exceed the boundaries
imposed by the commissars of political correctness, Wolfe may be
the only great mannerist left still writing large social novels—and
doing so with high style, hard work, and a healthy measure of
defiance.
In
Back to Blood he continues to bring it off. It may be that
he succeeds because he understands, as our reigning literary
commissars do not, that although the terms of social engagement
have shifted dramatically, basic decency and standards of human
behavior have not. This basic insight, simple yet profound, is what
a great number of readers—one suspects a majority—are hungry for in
our literature.
From the beginning, first as leading practitioner of the “New
Journalism” (now called Creative Nonfiction and taught in
university writing programs), Wolfe has been uniquely able to
capture and satirize the pretensions and excesses characteristic of
distinct periods in American social history, as in Radical Chic
& Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers, and to celebrate the basic
and unchanging strengths of our country, as in The Right
Stuff. No doubt in part to show other writers how it’s done,
he wrote an extraordinary novel, The Bonfire of the
Vanities, which was both a runaway best seller and critically
acclaimed—a rarity in our age, and a throwback to the novels we
once routinely expected from our best writers. Bonfire was
followed by two substantial and much-discussed novels, A Man in
Full and I Am Charlotte Simmons. In each case, the
sharp, accurate, and wide-ranging social observations and criticism
set his novels apart from the increasingly introspective efforts of
his peers.
IN THE MIAMI in which Wolfe sets Back to Blood, there’s
a new social structure to be examined, a tribal system built on
determinants such as race, ethnicity, blood—a structure within
which each tribe scrambles for supremacy. As Wolfe’s venal Cuban
mayor of Miami, Dionisio Cruz, puts it: “I was talking to a woman…a
Haitian lady, and she says to me, ‘Dio, if you really want to
understand Miami, you got to realize one thing first of all. In
Miami, everybody hates everybody.’”
The old melting-pot concept has been turned on its head. Miami
has become an American city where Anglos or wannabe Anglos,
descendants of the men who gave us that concept, are now, along
with blacks and Asians, a distinct minority. Miami has become the
unofficial capital of Latin America, and its Cuban population sets
the standard for minority assimilation. Cuban Americans are good
citizens and fierce patriots, especially insofar as they perceive
the U.S. to be unyielding in its opposition to Fidel Castro. But
let that opposition show sign of softening, and the reaction sends
tremors through the political establishment, as well as those
institutions like the press, accustomed to shaping rather than
buckling to public opinion.
This will cause problems for Wolfe’s Miami Herald
editor, Edward T. Topping IV (his son’s nickname is Fiver), who is
on the surface “an ideal-typical member of the breed
[WASP]…Hotchkiss, Yale… tall, six-three, slender in a gangly way…
light-brown hair, thick but shot through with glints of gray…looked
like Donegal tweed, his hair did….” But beneath the surface, he’s a
timorous man, deathly afraid of his sharp-tongued wife, full of
self-doubt, wanting to be known as a great newsman, but knowing
nothing about the business, and given to slender thoughts that skim
along the surface of his consciousness, as he plays the role of an
editor of a great daily in the way he thinks it should be played.
(One of Wolfe’s signature techniques is to allow his characters’
thoughts to run through the narrative, dramatizing the differences
between appearance and reality.)
But Jesus Christ, [Topping] wonders, what was some White
Anglo-Saxon Protestant, some last lost soul of a dying genus, doing
editing the Miami Herald?…He had taken the job without a
clue. When the Loop Syndicate bought the Herald from the
McClatchy Company and suddenly promoted him….he had only one
question: How big a splash will this make in the Yale alumni
magazine?
The Loop researchers, he recalls vaguely, tried to brief
him. He tries to remember. Did they tell him that more than half of
all Miami’s citizens were recent (within the past 50 years)
immigrants?
Who would have guessed? Did one segment of them, the Cubans,
control the city politically—Cuban mayor, Cuban department heads,
Cuban cops….60 percent of the force Cubans plus 10 percent other
Latins, 18 percent American blacks, and only 12 percent Anglos? And
didn’t the general population break down pretty much the same
way?…Hmmmh….Interesting I’m sure….And did the American blacks
resent the Cuban cops, who might as well have dropped from the
sky…for the sole purpose of pushing black people around?…And had
Haitians been pouring into Miami by the untold tens of thousands,
resenting the fact that the American government legalized illegal
Cuban immigrants in a snap of the fingers….and now Venezuelans,
Nicaraguans, Puerto Ricans, Colombians, Russians,
Israelis….Hmmmmh….How does all that go again?
The purpose of the briefing had been to identify the tensions
and “encourage Ed and his staff to ‘make allowances’ and stress
Diversity, which was good, even rather noble…he should be careful
not to antagonize any of these factions.…He should ‘maintain an
even keel’” while the Syndicate “was going all out to ‘cyberize’
the Herald and El Nuevo Herald, free them from
the gnarled old grip of print….The subtext was, in the meantime, if
the mutts start growling, snarling and disemboweling one another
with their teeth—celebrate the Diversity of it all and make sure
the teeth get whitened.”
Unfortunately for Topping, the mutts are soon set growling by
Nestor Comacho, a young Cuban American cop serving in a police
maritime unit who stars in the story that Topping thinks will bring
him the accolade he hears in his reveries: “He’s a real newspaper
man.” Comacho, on duty with the marine patrol, climbs a rope to the
top of a sailboat’s mast to rescue a man apparently immobilized
there, locks his legs around him, and, swinging hand over hand some
80 feet down a cable, brings the man to the deck. The cameras are
there; he’s treated as a hero, tells his story to a Herald
reporter named John Smith, and is spread across the front page of
the newspaper.
But there were also crowds of Cubans on the scene, cursing and
jeering, claiming that the man was an escapee from Castro’s Cuba,
trying to reach a bridge that abutted the boat so that he could
stand on American soil and be given asylum. By disrupting the plan,
Comacho becomes a traitor to his fellow Cubans and unwelcome in his
own family. As the growls grow louder and Topping’s brief triumph
explodes, the reporter Smith approaches him with a new story
involving art forgeries, a swindling Russian oligarch, and millions
of dollars worth of fake early modernist paintings, along with a
fortune spent to house them. Topping worries that this will reduce
the Miami arts establishment to a bunch of “utterly lame-brained,
unbelievably gullible, unbelievable culture strivers! The horse
laugh would resound round the world!”
Smith is ordered to drop the story, but with Nestor Comacho’s
help, pursues and breaks it. Because the forgery scam is not only
huge in Miami but is of international proportions, Smith wins
universal acclaim for his paper and for his editor, who tried to
call him off the trail. And although the Miami arts establishment
does indeed prove to be a bunch of gullible, lame-brained “culture
strivers,” Edward Topping IV himself “had become a new man, a
strong man, a real man, and a credit to the newspaper game.”
NE-Conservative| 11.29.12 @ 8:11AM
This is a fairly good synopsis of the novel. He overstates the role of some characters but not seriously.
As a long time fan of Wolfe, I enjoyed this latest work very much. However, the work would have been significantly improved if a good editor had been allowed to pare it down. Wolfe stretches out and repeats things to distraction - unnecessarily so. That said, it's worth reading and stands well above the enormous amount of thoughtless (in every sense) novels and stories published today.
PJ| 11.29.12 @ 11:26AM
If Wolfe is at least a good writer, his work should not need more than a minimum amount of editing.
Wolfe's work is only average even compared to the crap out there but not even close to becoming a classic.
Psst- I did enjoy reading The Bonfires of the Vanities.
Alan Brooks | 11.29.12 @ 10:05PM
"The Electric Kool Ade Acid Test intoduced me to Ken Kesey and The Grateful Dead as well as Larry McMurtry."
Again, Wolfe is not conservative: no conservative would write 'The Electric Kool Aid Acid Test'.
JGW| 11.29.12 @ 9:48AM
Started reading Wolfe many years ago. I believe I've read everything he has written. This ones on my list.
Interesting where his novels can take you. The Electric Kool Ade Acid Test intoduced me to Ken Kesey and The Grateful Dead as well as Larry McMurtry.
Guimo| 11.29.12 @ 10:44AM
I just finished it and was very disappointed. Not in the same league as "Bonfire of the Vanities" or "A Man in Full." Set-piece chapters are unconvincing. Plot is weak. I'm a big Tom Wolfe fan, but this is not his best book by far.
Hardcard| 11.29.12 @ 12:08PM
Novels ? we don't need no stinkin novels. I want more kardasian reality, what's lohan doing?? who does susan rice's nails? Is barry (the one) still smoking dope?
Albert Constantine Jr.| 11.29.12 @ 6:12PM
Bonfire of the Vanities was a very good book, but depressing in how it revealed the bankrupt nature of its time 20 years ago, and showed a road map of so much wohich would get worse in the future.
LONE STAR| 11.29.12 @ 9:12PM
I saw the movie and it is really good, but way too politically incorrect....That's a compliment
Alan Brooks | 11.29.12 @ 10:03PM
Wolfe is not conservative: no conservative would write 'The Electric Kool Aid Acid Test'.
Tina B| 11.30.12 @ 2:25PM
Let's see that was, hmmm, around 40 to 45 years ago? I believe I've come a long way since then, and I am now a Conservative too. Very, in fact. And I may have been part of some acid test, somewhere, long ago. I can't remember all of the late 60s for some reason.