The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Special Report

Religiously Commemorating El Alamein

The Church of England can still rise to the occasion.

If there is any advantage to a state church, it is the religious stagecraft it can produce for momentous occasions of state that crave spiritual sanction. For all its faults, the Church of England remains expert at such events. Its latest success was commemorating at Westminster Abbey a couple weeks ago the 70th anniversary of the decisive Battle of El Alamein.

The battle in Egypt’s western desert defeated German Field Marshall Erwin Rommel, celebrated as the “Desert Fox,” after his string of victories across North Africa. El Alamein was a tonic for somber Britain, which had weathered three years of nearly continuous defeat. Prime Minister Winston Churchill at the time called it a “bright gleam that caught the helmets of the soldiers, and warmed and cheered all our hearts.” He ordered Britain’s church bells rung nationwide for the first time since World War II had begun. “Before Alamein we never had a victory,” he later said. “After Alamein we never had a defeat.” The battle’s hero was General, later Field Marshall, Bernard Montgomery, who would remain Britain’s most celebrated wartime commander. Clashing with American generals like Dwight Eisenhower and George Patton, Montgomery typically fairs poorly in American produced dramas, such as the 1971 academy award winning Patton with George C. Scott. Indisputably eccentric, if maybe not always as preening and insufferable as his American allies portrayed him, Montgomery was still a suitable military hero for a Britain desperately in need of one.

Montgomery’s 84-year-old son, the current Viscount of El Alamein, wonderfully read from St. Paul’s Letter to the Romans at the commemorative service: “Let us then lay aside the works of darkness and put on the armor of light.” Over 40 survivors of the battle attended the evensong worship at Westminster Abbey. They were a small remnant of the 200,000 British Commonwealth and other Allied forces at the battle in 1942, about 4,000 of whom were killed. At stake had been the Suez Canal, the oil of the Middle East, and ultimately strategic access to the underbelly of the Soviet Union, where most of the German army was then locked in murderous struggle.

Germany throughout the war struggled for oil, and Rommel’s Afrika Korps was itself nearly depleted at the time of El Alamein. While the British Eighty Army was by then engorged with supplies, especially tanks and planes from both Britain and the U.S., the Germans were down to a few dozen tanks by the battle’s conclusion. Rommel himself had in fact returned to the front only after the battle had begun, having been recuperating from illness in Germany. An initial order from Hitler forbade retreat, but withdrawal was eventually countenanced by Berlin, and Rommel uncharacteristically had to flee. Tens of thousands of Italian troops, not so uncharacteristically, were left to surrender. Churchill famously declared afterwards: “This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”

One British general who attended the Westminster service commented: “In the Abbey I felt huge poignancy because you’re aware when you lay the wreath on behalf of all those thousands of men who died at Alamein and just around you are just a few who really knew them and felt their pain, so I think I felt honoured and privileged.”

Another British general was also quoted in the same news release: “It’s almost embarrassing to meet them to the extent that they are so humble and blasé about what we would have regarded as life changing experiences had we been there in a tank, in an armoured car, on the gun line, or as sappers clearing fields, all of the things you read about when you study El Alamein were described to me by those who actually did it. It’s a unique experience.”

A 91-year-old battle veteran told the assembled worshippers that his tank crew had traveled half way across North Africa, but all but he were killed by the time they crossed the Seine River later in France. The Dean of Westminster during the service somberly pledged: “We shall remember those who died in the battle and those who have died since, giving thanks for their courage and determination, and as we celebrate the reconciliation of former enemies we shall pray for lasting peace in the world.” Standing at the Grave of the Unknown Warrior within the abbey, he commended all who fell at El Alamein to the “unfailing love of our heavenly Father.”

The music at Westminster Abbey, performed by the Band of the Royal Artillery, included the Alamein March, the theme from Out of Africa, Nimrod the Hunter, and a Hymn to New England. The closing prayer, recalling Christ’s victory over the grave, implored “eternal rest, we pray, to those who died in the desert of North Africa,” whose “heroism” might inspire “coming of thy kingdom where memories are healed, and where grief gives way to joy.” The crowd of about 500 recited the Apostles’ Creed, the Lord’s Prayer, and sang “God Save the Queen.”

Clerics processed in flowing, bright vestments, while elderly veterans hobbled about clad in red uniforms festooned with medals. The British Empire might be gone, but its ceremonies, and its great Church, still live on, remembering supreme moments whose survivors are now increasingly few.

About the Author

Mark Tooley is president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy in Washington, D.C. and author of Methodism and Politics in the Twentieth CenturyYou can follow him on Twitter @markdtooley.


Letter to the Editor View all comments (10) |

Appleby| 11.16.12 @ 6:30AM

One of the quotations from the movie Patton that stands out in my memory is of George C. Scott standing on a hillside during the battle and shouting, "Rommel, you magnificent b*****d, I READ YOUR BOOK!" Praise to the Brits for keeping the memory of these very real and nearly forgotten battles fresh for the Occupier Generation who have never heard of them at all.

Stormzeye| 11.16.12 @ 8:23AM

No one has ever done ceremony better than the Brits except maybe those eastern despots from whom they learned. As for Monty, his arrogant insistence on Operation Market Garden proved to be a total disaster as well as other ideas of his which Ike was wise enough to ignore or overrule. El-Alemain was truly a game changer in spite of him.

Al Adab| 11.16.12 @ 11:51AM

The lesson to remember is that opposition to tyranny, in whatever form, is the highest duty of man. The cost is often high, but the defense of Liberty demands no less. Whether the American people will remember this lesson today seems in doubt as they seek a paternalistic, benevolent but no less tyranical government of their own. How they may decide to oppose themselves in its creation remains to be seen, but opposition there will be. That is no less critical than those who fought in the western desert so long ago.

Albert Constantine Jr.| 11.16.12 @ 1:14PM

As governments of the era stood, England was probably one of the more benevolent somewhat constitutional monarchies of the age in 1775. Nonetheless, when its colonial subjects found its rule to be increasingly tyrannical, and failed to redress their grievances of same, they stood up, fought back and hung in until they were victorious.

This is a particularly critical message today.

Ronsch| 11.16.12 @ 2:43PM

Montgomery...A legend in his own mind and a necessary "hero" when Great Britain needed one most. The could have as easily picked Frederick "Boy" Browning or Roy Urquhart.

Occam's Tool| 11.16.12 @ 3:17PM

Folks, this type of set-piece battle truly was Monty's best moment. True, he was overall a mediocre General (Slim was far better, as was Patton, Stilwell, Rose, Teddy Roosevelt Jr., Harmon, Collins, Ridgeway, Gavin, Bradley, Sampson, Eichelberger, Kruger, John P Wood, etc. on the American side).

Dimitry_Aleksandrovich| 11.16.12 @ 7:52PM

There is something to be said about having a state church or at least in the case of Russia a Church that is closely allied with the state. Since the fall of the Soviet Union the Russian Orthodox Church has been on the front lines of creating a Russian identity in the void that was left by the fall of the Soviet Union. The Russian Church is the traditional spiritual guide of the Russian people and when Orthodoxy is practiced there culture, tradition, heritage and spirituality all coincide and the Russian knows who he is and his place in this world.

Occam's Tool| 11.18.12 @ 8:46PM

Yes, Dmitry, like the Church of the California Liberal, which you voted for in November.

Dimitry_Aleksandrovich| 11.20.12 @ 6:38PM

I am not a liberal by any means. I am to the right of you Occam for sure. My vote in November (I wrote in Ron Paul and then voted no on Prop. 32 and a straight Democratic ticket) was a protest vote against the Republican Party of which I have belonged since my 18th birthday. I am not a liberal...you are. All free-for-all market capitalists are LIBERALS so much so that from its inception capitalism (like socialism and communism) had strong opponents in the Roman Catholic Church.

WRK| 11.30.12 @ 5:48PM

There can not be no greater land of 'Island People' whom will hold in the highest of esteem those whom served their country when called upon.

More Articles by Mark Tooley

More Articles From Special Report

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/11/16/religiously-commemorating-el-a

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT