The Terrorist Next Door: How the Government is Deceiving You
About the Islamist Threat
By Erick Stakelbeck
(Regnery Publishing, 256 pages, $27.95)
THERE PROBABLY have been few more bafflingly stupid exchanges
between a government official and a congressional committee than
the May 2010 question-and-answer session between Attorney General
Eric Holder and members of the House Judiciary Committee. This took
place a few days after a would-be mass murderer, Faisal Shahzad,
was arrested upon attempting to set off a car bomb in New York’s
Times Square. Shahzad, a recent American citizen of Pakistani
birth, had traveled to remote Taliban-controlled regions of
Pakistan, which U.S. authorities knew even before his arrest. He
had been on a “no-fly” list since at least 2004, but, at the time
of his attempted bombing of Times Square, the U.S. government had
apparently no surveillance of him. Shortly after setting the bombs,
which mercifully malfunctioned, Shahzad boarded a plane to Dubai
and nearly got away.
At the hearing called to investigate how a dangerous terrorist
could have evaded almost all official efforts to protect the
country after 9/11, Congressman Lamar Smith of Texas asked the
attorney general if radical Islam might have been one of Shahzad’s
motivations. The following banter ensued:
Holder: There are a variety of reasons why
people—
Smith: But was radical Islam one of them?
Holder: There are a variety of reasons why
people do these things. Some of them are potentially
religious-based—
Smith: But all I’m asking is if you think among
those variety of reasons, radical Islam might have been one of the
reasons that the individuals took the steps that they did.
Holder: You see—radical Islam—I think those
people who espouse a version of Islam that is not—
Smith: Are you uncomfortable attribution any of
the actions to radical Islam? It sounds like it.
Holder: No, I don’t want to say anything
negative about a religion.
Obtuseness can be infectious. Before Shahzad’s arrest, Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano opined that the Times Square
incident had been a “one-off” event, as though a major bomb plot
were simply an example of road rage.
Even the terminally silly mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg,
speculated that the unknown perpetrator might have acted out of
irritation with the Obama health care bill. Fortunately, such
collective idiocy was given the coup de grâce by Shahzad
himself. He wore a white Muslim prayer cap at his sentencing,
shouted “Allahu Akbar!” and said he would “sacrifice a thousand
lives for Allah.” “War with Muslims has just begun….the defeat of
the U.S. is imminent, God willing.”
For the U.S. attorney general to deny that Islam had anything to
do with a dangerous mass murder plot by a known Islamist is
tantamount to a law enforcement official of the FDR administration
denying that saboteurs who had landed by German submarines in 1943
had anything to do with the Nazis. Mercifully, patriotic U.S.
government officials at that point in history were more clear-eyed
about the dangers America was facing.
Erick Stakelbeck’s book is an intriguing—but
frightening—illustration of two points of well-established fact: 1)
the extent to which Islamists have already penetrated American
society at many levels with an agenda totally inimical to the U.S.
Constitution and 2) how liberal political correctness has blinded a
huge component of American officialdom to the threat that America
faces.
First, it’s important to note that Stakelbeck displays not a
smidgen of animosity toward Muslims already within the U.S. He
praises many of them for their steadfast opposition to the “grand
jihad” of Muslim Brotherhood supporters who simply want to
undermine American constitutional democracy. The author notes how
much of the motives of MB operatives surfaced clearly during the
2007–2008 trial of members of the Holy Land Foundation, a secretive
and dishonest organization that collected money to support the
Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas. During the trial—after
which five men were sentenced to long jail terms—a 1991 memorandum
from one Mohammed Akram, member of the board of governors of the
Muslim Brotherhood, was read into the court record. The memorandum,
whose authenticity and provenance has never been challenged by the
Muslim Brotherhood worldwide, called for a “grand Jihad” aimed at
subverting Western societies from within. This would be done by
“sabotaging its miserable house [Western democracies] by their
hands and the hands of the [Muslim] believers so that it is
eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other
religions.”