The YouTube video of rebels firing on Kurdish protesters in
Ashrafiya can be easily be held up as damning enough evidence of
rebel unpopularity among Kurdish residents, and be used to uphold
the PYD’s image as protector of Syrian Kurds and their neutrality
in the conflict between regime and rebels.
This perception of the PYD among Kurds can now be strengthened
by news of an attack by rebels of the
Northern Storm Brigade on Kurds (including Yezidis) in villages
to the north of Aleppo. Since the perpetrators of these assaults
are almost certainly of an Islamist orientation, any notion of
Salaheddin-Nusra collaboration is only likely to stir up anger on
the part of ordinary Kurds towards the Salaheddin Brigade and by
implication (however
tenuous) the KNC.
Further, the PYD has now negotiated a formal truce with the FSA
to stop the fighting and end the Northern Storm Brigade’s attacks
on Kurds, further enhancing its image as protector and
representative of Kurdish interests in Syria.
In short, the PYD still appears to have the upper-hand over its
rivals for influence among Kurds in Syria, and that advantage now
seems to be reinforced by this recent debacle over Ashrafiya. It is
probable that the PYD’s dominance will continue to be the status
quo vis-à-vis the Kurdish situation in Syria for quite some time,
mainly owing to its superior militia affiliates. The tensions
between the PYD and other Kurdish factions are very much apparent
but one should not automatically conclude that there will be an
intra-Kurdish civil war, for all groups are undoubtedly mindful and
wary of the experience in Iraqi Kurdistan after the region gained
autonomy, when thousands died in a civil war between the Kurdistan
Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (the latter
backed by the PKK). A more likely outcome is brinkmanship from time
to time, with much mediation between factions on the part of the
KRG.
Havoc| 11.8.12 @ 6:50AM
Great sleeping weather.
Hardcard| 11.8.12 @ 9:10AM
All these moslem jihadist have AK-47's did they get them at Holder's Black Market ?
Dimitry_Aleksandrovich| 11.8.12 @ 12:44PM
The violence in Syria is the direct result of the flawed foreign policy of the United States, it's NATO allies and it's Turkish and Wahhabist Arab friends in the Middle East. The end result of regime change in Syria could very well be the ethnic cleansing of my Christian brothers and sisters in Syria as well as the cleansing of Alawites, Druze, Kurds and other non-Sunni sects in the country.
cicero| 11.8.12 @ 3:48PM
During and after WWI, the old Turkish empire collapsed. What is happening now would have happened then, but for the intervention of the Western victorious powers who stepped in, established artificial borders and lines of authority, and held the sides apart. Out of shear luck, the balance held through WWII, and into recent years. The power struggle for supremacy that would have been wagedd then is now beginning. There is very little the West can do, unless it wants to invade andd take control again under the guise of protectorates.
Since the 7th century, the muslim groups have realized regime change through violent means. They are merely reverting to form, albeit with modern, highly destructive weaponry. The various factions are trying to draw outside powers in on their respective sides. The outside powers will only do so if they are complete idiots. Blood will spill no matter what. The only question will be on whom can they blame it.
Commander Kelly | 11.18.12 @ 6:05PM
See my post "Are Syrian babies not as cute as British babies" only here...http://americanconservativeinlondon.blogspot.co.uk/