Amid claims of major advances for anti-regime forces in Aleppo,
news emerged that rebels in the city had moved into the Kurdish
neighborhood of Ashrafiya, which has been under the control of the
Kurdish Democratic Party (PYD). Throughout the Syrian uprising and
subsequent civil war, the PYD has maintained a policy of
neutrality, attacking both rebel and regime forces who might
impinge on their zones of control.
Later, a video emerged on
YouTube that purported to show rebel fighters firing on an
anti-rebel demonstration in Ashrafiya. These fighters were
identified as operating under the banner of the Free Syrian Army
(FSA). Clashes between rebels and militiamen from the PYD-aligned
Popular Protection Committees (YPD) culminated in the expulsion of
rebels from Ashrafiya.
While this skirmish can be interpreted as signs of escalating
Arab-Kurdish tensions in Syria and a desire on the part of Arab
rebels to impose their will on the Kurds, a report last week in
Lebanon’s Daily Star purports to give a more complex
picture.
Citing the PYD’s Foreign Relations Committee head — Zuhat
Kobani — and Arab opposition sources, it is alleged that at least
some of the rebels who entered Ashrafiya were members of the
predominantly Kurdish Salaheddin Brigade.
The Salaheddin Brigade generally consists of strongly anti-PYD
and anti-PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party) Kurds. Their own
backgrounds vary: some are members of the Azadi (Freedom) party
that is part of the Kurdish National Council (KNC), others are —
in the words of the Daily Star report — “disgruntled
former PKK members.”
It should be noted that the KNC reached a nominal accord with
the PYD in the summer that was mediated by Massoud Barzani, who is
the president of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in Iraqi
Kurdistan.
Yet tensions remain deep, as the KNC perceives that the PYD is
monopolizing control of Kurdish areas with its affiliated militias
that are by far the most powerful among the various Kurdish
factions in Syria.
Meanwhile, PYD members have accused elements of the KNC of being
stooges for Turkey. As Wladimir
van Wilgenburg noted in a report for the Kurdish outlet
Rudaw, these allegations prompted the PYD’s arrest of the
leader of the Azadi party — Mustafa Jama — at the end of June,
although he was later released.
In the context of such tension, it is not so implausible that
members of the Salaheddin Brigade might cooperate with Arab rebels.
Therefore, what we may have here in Ashrafiya is a case of
intra-Kurdish partisan politics.
Members of the Salaheddin Brigade apparently saw their chance to
dislodge the PYD from its stronghold in Aleppo and in an attempt to
achieve this goal they allegedly collaborated with the hardline
Arab jihadist al-Nusra (according to the Daily Star
report), whose firepower they believed they could exploit to take
on the PYD.
However, objections could be raised to this account.
Specifically, the Salaheddin Brigade denies moving into Ashrafiya,
and the only Kurdish sources cited in the Beirut-based newspaper’s
report are a PYD official and a Kurdish analyst based in the United
States.
In addition, despite the presence of Azadi members in the
battalion, the Salaheddin Brigade does not have formal links with
any Kurdish parties.
It might also strike the observer as an odd calculation on the
part of members of the Salaheddin Brigade that they should work
with al-Nusra in the apparent expectation that the Islamist
militants would subsequently leave them alone.
On the other hand, perhaps those elements of the Salaheddin
Brigade thought they would have the popular support of the Kurdish
residents of Ashrafiya and as such they could ward off any
potential threat from al-Nusra.
Whether the Salaheddin Brigade was actually involved in this
rebel move into Ashrafiya cannot be definitely proven and will
require further evidence, but in any case, the whole affair is a
clear propaganda victory for the PYD.
Havoc| 11.8.12 @ 6:50AM
Great sleeping weather.
Hardcard| 11.8.12 @ 9:10AM
All these moslem jihadist have AK-47's did they get them at Holder's Black Market ?
Dimitry_Aleksandrovich| 11.8.12 @ 12:44PM
The violence in Syria is the direct result of the flawed foreign policy of the United States, it's NATO allies and it's Turkish and Wahhabist Arab friends in the Middle East. The end result of regime change in Syria could very well be the ethnic cleansing of my Christian brothers and sisters in Syria as well as the cleansing of Alawites, Druze, Kurds and other non-Sunni sects in the country.
cicero| 11.8.12 @ 3:48PM
During and after WWI, the old Turkish empire collapsed. What is happening now would have happened then, but for the intervention of the Western victorious powers who stepped in, established artificial borders and lines of authority, and held the sides apart. Out of shear luck, the balance held through WWII, and into recent years. The power struggle for supremacy that would have been wagedd then is now beginning. There is very little the West can do, unless it wants to invade andd take control again under the guise of protectorates.
Since the 7th century, the muslim groups have realized regime change through violent means. They are merely reverting to form, albeit with modern, highly destructive weaponry. The various factions are trying to draw outside powers in on their respective sides. The outside powers will only do so if they are complete idiots. Blood will spill no matter what. The only question will be on whom can they blame it.
Commander Kelly | 11.18.12 @ 6:05PM
See my post "Are Syrian babies not as cute as British babies" only here...http://americanconservativeinlondon.blogspot.co.uk/