This country is at a historic crossroads, and the path we choose
can determine our future far beyond the next four years. Our
children and grandchildren may someday bless us or curse us for
what we do this Tuesday. Against that background, it is painful to
see the petty talking points and gross misconceptions that seem to
dominate this year’s election campaign.
Take the question of jobs. How many times have we heard about
how many jobs have been added during the Obama administration? Yet
few people bother to find out whether these are net additions to
jobs — which is what is crucial.
The government can always increase some jobs, either directly by
hiring more people or indirectly by policies that increase
employment in particular industries or regions. But the real
question is whether the government’s actions create more jobs than
they destroy — that is, whether there is any net addition to
jobs.
Yet who in the media even asks that question?
Instead, they focus on the unemployment rate. But people who
have given up looking for a job are not counted as unemployed. The
proportion of the working age population that is not working is
higher now than it has been in many years.
Another gross misconception on the job front is that jobs
created during a given administration are a result of the policies
of that administration, as are any other signs of economic
recovery. But this assumes that the economy is incapable of
recovering on its own, without government intervention.
Yet the American economy recovered from downturns on its own for
more than a century and a half, until President Herbert Hoover
intervened after the stock market crash of 1929. Indeed, this was
one of those bipartisan interventions so much hoped for by the
media — and the results were catastrophic.
The media misconception today is that what we need to speed up
economic recovery is to end gridlock in Washington and have
bipartisan intervention in the economy. However plausible that may
sound, it is contradicted repeatedly by history.
Unemployment was never in double digits in any of the 12 months
following the stock market crash of 1929. Only after politicians
started intervening did unemployment reach double digits — and
stay in double digits throughout the 1930s.
There is nothing mysterious about an economy recovering on its
own. Employers usually have incentives to employ and workers have
incentives to look for jobs. Lenders have incentives to lend and
borrowers have incentives to borrow — if politicians do not create
needless complications and uncertainties.
The Obama administration is in its glory creating complications
and uncertainties for business, ranging from runaway regulations to
the unknowable future costs of ObamaCare and taxes. Record amounts
of idle cash held by businesses and financial institutions are a
monument to the counterproductive effects of Barack Obama’s
anti-business policies and rhetoric. That idle money could create
lots of jobs — net jobs — if politics did not make it risky to
invest.
We often hear that President Obama inherited the worst recession
since the Great Depression. But just how do you define that? By how
high the unemployment rate went? By how long the recovery takes? Or
don’t you bother to define it at all?
The annual unemployment rate was as high under Ronald Reagan as
it has been under Barack Obama. The difference is that Ronald
Reagan did nothing, despite media cries for action, and Barack
Obama did virtually everything imaginable, to the cheers of the
media. The economy recovered a lot faster under Reagan.
If this is “the worst recession since the Great Depression,” it
is the worst solely in terms of how long it is taking to recover.
But how long this has lasted is precisely what critics of Barack
Obama are complaining about. Yet clever political rhetoric turns
Obama’s failure into an excuse for failure.
Contrary to political and media spin, President Obama did not
“inherit” his unemployment from President George W. Bush. The
annual unemployment rate never got above 6 percent during the eight
years of President George W. Bush’s administration.
Unemployment has never been that low under President Obama.
Passing the buck backwards is a very poor excuse — especially for
someone using “forward” as his campaign slogan.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
