Eric
Hoffer: The Longshoreman Philosopher
By Tom Bethell
(Hoover Institution Press, 304 PAGES, $29.95)
LIKE MANY AMERICANS OF MY GENERATION, I first became aware of
Eric Hoffer through a pair of riveting interviews of the
“Longshoreman Philosopher” conducted by Eric Sevareid and broadcast
on CBS television in June 1967 and November 1968. The Hoffer
interviews, lasting an hour each, turned a talented but relatively
obscure blue-collar “philosopher,” known to only a small circle of
readers and editors, into a national celebrity. In his perceptive
and diligently researched new biography of Hoffer, author and
longtime TAS contributor Tom Bethell captures both the
content and the impact of those two television interviews: “CBS
filmed Hoffer walking in Golden Gate Park, but mostly sitting in
the corner of a hotel room, an awkward-looking space, talking
volubly. His strong German accent must have made things difficult
for some viewers. Often he spoke rapidly, ranging in volume from a
whisper to a shout. He spoke with great passion, responding almost
instantly, smoking cigarettes and frequently mopping himself with a
handkerchief.”
Hoffer’s forceful, compelling delivery was harnessed to a
powerful message, one that was seldom heard in those days on
network television, but that resonated with millions of ordinary
citizens. He “boomed out praise of America and the workers, and
denounced the intellectuals who, he said, were by then on their
familiar fault-finding mission against the country. A bemused
Sevareid, also smoking, mostly just listened and seemed to relish
Hoffer’s contrarian views. The audience, he knew, was hearing
something unusual.”
According to Sevareid, the first interview “broke just about all
the records for telephone and mail response… the telephone
switchboards in every CBS station across the country lit up. The
next day, I was told, his little books sold out in virtually every
bookstore that had them.”
Eric Hoffer, a very private, almost reclusive autodidact with no
known formal education, had become, literally overnight, a popular
celebrity and, ironically—considering what he thought of the
intelligentsia as a class—America’s first truly “public”
intellectual. Nothing quite like that could happen today for two
very good reasons.
First, at the time there were only three national networks to
choose from, and CBS, which liked to think of itself as a bit more
cerebral than NBC and ABC, actually allotted big chunks of prime
time to cultural and intellectual programming. This meant that, on
any given night, a plurality of all Americans watching
television—which families tended to do together in those days,
clustered around a single set in the living room or family
room—might end up looking at the same program. That kind of
saturation is virtually impossible today with hundreds of cable and
satellite outlets all competing for the same viewers around the
clock. Maybe it’s just as well, given the abysmal state of most of
the current cardboard sitcoms, unreal reality shows, and dumbeddown
news coverage.
And then there’s reason number two: They just don’t make them
like Eric Hoffer anymore.
A self-described uneducated “nobody,” he had eked out a meager
living as a transient laborer, a busboy, and a prospector on the
West Coast before settling into the tough but comparatively stable
life of a longshoreman working the docks of San Francisco. Living
in flophouses, shelters, workers’ dorms, and rented rooms, Hoffer
gave himself—albeit selectively and idiosyncratically—a formidable
classical education. Michel de Montaigne and Blaise Pascal ranked
among his favorite writers, and what Tom Bethell describes as the
early “shaping influence on his ideas” came from the writings of
Alexis de Tocqueville and Ernest Renan. Immersion in the work of
such masterful authors and thinkers helped him develop his own
powerful, precise, and-in the best sense of the word-cultivated
prose.
How had Eric Hoffer managed it during his early hardscrabble
days as a migrant worker? As he told a previous biographer, James
D. Koerner, whenever he managed to accumulate some spare cash, “I
bought all new clothes and threw the old ones away. Then I went to
the Japanese barber.… Then I got myself a room halfway between the
library and the whorehouse.” All that time devoted to books and
bordellos gave Hoffer a panoramic view of the human condition that
was both informed and earthy, with none of the illusions that
afflict the “true believer” mentality of so many intellectuals.
TO HOFFER, AMERICA WAS THE ONLY GOOD, truly new thing to come
along after millennia of Old World tyranny and degradation. In one
of many diary entries on the subject, he would write, “To me it is
a miracle that 200 million people who are largely the descendants
of rejects and dropouts from Europe should have created in this
country the most important material power on the planet.” It’s not
quite so miraculous when one remembers that everyone who reached
these shores as an immigrant—as opposed to a slave—was already an
exceptional person before arrival. For every immigrant who left the
squalor, poverty, and oppression of 19th-century Sicily, Calabria,
Ireland, Czarist Russia, or the Ottoman Empire, there were
thousands of sufferers who never stirred, never dreamed, and never
dared. No matter how humble their stock, those immigrants were
extraordinary, the result of an almost Darwinian process of natural
selection—Everyman as Superman—with levels of energy and initiative
that far outpaced those of the friends, neighbors, and relatives
they left behind in the old country.
What better example than Eric Hoffer himself? While we will
probably never know the true details of his birth and childhood
years—most of what he wrote about them was contradictory or
unsubstantiated—he clearly was immigrant stock, and quite possibly
an immigrant himself. Until his dying day, he spoke with a
particular type of thick German accent: southern “Low German”
characteristic of Bavaria and Austria, although he claimed that his
father was a cabinet maker from Alsace-Lorraine who had settled in
the Bronx. No records exist to that effect. His dramatic accounts
of childhood blindness, benevolent nurses, and the early deaths of
both parents are also unsubstantiated. Indeed, the first
documentation of Hoffer himself is his application for a Social
Security account, filed in Sacramento, California, on June 10,
1937, when he would have been 38 years old. His pre-California life
is thus a matter of speculation, and it is possible—even
likely—that he was born in Germany, received some primary and
secondary education there, and emigrated to America on his own as a
young man, “jumping ship” without papers and heading pretty quickly
to the West Coast.
All of which explains the absence of a birth certificate and
raises the possibility that this quintessentially American
character lived and died in his adoptive country as an illegal
alien. Who knows? He may even have invented the name by which he
became famous; “Hoff” is German for “hope,” and “Hoffer,” while not
a legitimate German word, could be construed as “one who
hopes.”
Whatever the truth about Eric Hoffer’s origins—and Bethell has
done his commendable best to make sense of the few facts
available—the thinking and writing that would earn him his
welldeserved recognition were all done in California. It was there,
one might say, that his real life began. And if Hoffer, a born
“storyteller” by Bethell’s account, chose to create a mythical
childhood for himself, it makes him even more of a self-made man
than we thought he was.
The truths that really matter are the ones he framed so
eloquently in his philosophic writing, notably in his two best
books, The True Believer and The Ordeal of
Change. Both of my favorite Hoffer aphorisms—”Propaganda does
not deceive people; it merely helps them to deceive themselves,”
and “An empty head is not really empty; it is stuffed with rubbish.
Hence the difficulty of forcing anything into an empty
head,”—capture the essence of what makes fanatical True Believers
so invincibly ignorant.
A personal postscript: While I never had the pleasure of meeting
Eric Hoffer, our paths crossed in a different way. While serving as
Ronald Reagan’s director of presidential speechwriting from
1981-1983, I also was responsible for the selection process for the
Medal of Freedom, our country’s highest civilian prize. While I am
proud of all of the men and women who were granted that great honor
on my watch, two recipients that I personally recommended mean the
most to me. One was Eubie Blake, a son of slaves who went on to
become one of the greatest pianist-composers of the ragtime era,
and who was approaching his hundredth birthday when he came to the
White House to receive the medal. The other was Eric Hoffer. By the
time he won the award, he was too ill from emphysema to travel to
Washington. But I understand that he was fully aware of the honor:
America had finally and officially returned Eric Hoffer’s
embrace.