-
The Inoperative Jay Carney
May 23, 2013 | 134 comments
-
IRS Union Chief Stonewalls
May 21, 2013 | 57 comments
-
Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?
May 20, 2013 | 69 comments
-
The Liberal Union Behind the IRS
May 16, 2013 | 146 comments
-
Cumulus Media: Suicide of a Company?
May 14, 2013 | 64 comments
Special Report
The Olympics: Freedom Adrift
The force behind Bond, Potter, the Beatles; Of murdered Israeli athletes and the banned Greek.
It was so obvious it was completely taken for granted.
The Opening Ceremony of the London Olympics was a spectacular celebration of human freedom. A concept that in fact began to take root with a piece of parchment signed in 1215 and known as the Magna Carta, or the Great Charter of the Liberties of England.
Yet there wasn’t a peep about what we were really seeing in London the other night.
All of which shows precisely the very real dangers that freedom faces around the globe — not to mention right here at home in America.
As television and computer screens filled with spectacular images of James Bond, Mary Poppins, Harry Potter villain Lord Voldemort and the ageless Beatle Sir Paul, viewers were enthralled.
And yet… and yet… how did all these people real (the Beatles) and imagined come to be?
They came to be, of course, because a free country provided Ian Fleming, P.L. Travers, J.K. Rowling, and John, Paul, George, and Ringo the complete freedom to conjure and amaze audiences with their respective literary and musical creations.
This decision not to formally recognize the vital importance of freedom — and one must ask whether it was even a conscious decision as much as it was a simple taking for granted of a fact of life for Brits — was mirrored exactly in the decidedly conscious decision by IOC President Jacques Rogge. That decision? Not to have a moment of silence for the Israeli athletes slaughtered by Palestinian terrorists at the Munich Olympics in 1972. Instead, in what the New York Post called a “watered-down tribute,” there was this generic included in the program: “In a moving moment, those who are absent from us are digitally present.”
Can you imagine this? A group of terrorists — decided enemies of freedom — invaded the Olympics and committed mass murder, which is to say, killing Jews. And not a peep of specific recognition of this by the Olympic Committee whose very existence depends on the freedom of athletes to take their physical abilities to their limits — just as was true of the literary and musical talents of Fleming, Travers, Rowling, and Beatle Paul.
Not to be outdone in the reluctance to say a word on behalf of freedom, out in these vacation-precincts comes news of the plight of Greek Olympian Voula Papachristou. After years of intense training and making the Greek team the 23-year old Papachristou made the mistake of tweeting a tasteless dopey joke about an outbreak of West Nile virus in Athens. The joke? “With so many Africans in Greece, the West Nile mosquitoes will be getting home food!” For this, the young athlete — profuse apologies to no avail — was expelled from her team days before the Opening Ceremonies. This treatment coming from the country generally credited as the birthplace of democracy.
Not to be too obvious here, but taken together none of this bodes well for freedom.
An inability to recognize freedom in the midst of celebrating some of the most famous achievements in the recent history of artistic freedom, a decided unwillingness to specifically address the most heinous act of opposition to freedom in modern Olympic history — plus a fascist-like political correctness that costs a young woman her Olympic moment — all act as storm warnings. These are caution signals if not flashing red lights.
Freedom is, of course, tied inextricably to the success of capitalism. It is capitalism that made welfare mother Rowling richer than the Queen. It is capitalism that made the four lads from Liverpool rich beyond their dreams. And it is capitalism that, in the recent words of Charles Murray in the Wall Street Journal:
… is the best thing that has ever happened to the material condition of the human race. From the dawn of history until the 18th century, every society in the world was impoverished, with only the thinnest film of wealth on top. Then came capitalism and the Industrial Revolution. Everywhere that capitalism subsequently took hold, national wealth began to increase and poverty began to fail. Everywhere that capitalism didn’t take hold, people remained impoverished. Everywhere that capitalism has been rejected since then, poverty has increased.
Capitalism has lifted the world out of poverty because it gives people a chance to get rich by creating value and reaping the rewards.
About the Author
Jeffrey Lord is a former Reagan White House political director and author. He writes from Pennsylvania at jlpa1@aol.com.
Letter to the Editor View all comments (17) | Leave a comment
More Articles by Jeffrey Lord
More Articles From Special Report
http://spectator.org/archives/2012/07/31/the-olympics-freedom-adrift
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- The End of the Castros?
- The Continuing Crisis
- A President Loses His Power
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
H/T to National Review Online
ADVERTISEMENT
Appleby| 7.31.12 @ 6:44AM
Oh, was that what the Opening Ceremonies was "about"? I thought it was a desperate attempt to find something that the world wide audience had in common, without "offending" anybody.
Brookschwarzenegro | 7.31.12 @ 12:38PM
"and John, Paul, George, and Ringo the complete freedom to conjure and amaze audiences with their respective literary and musical creations."
Beatles are pretty liberal for you guys: they took drugs, had leftist politics, wild sex, wild music.
Paul McGrath| 7.31.12 @ 2:40PM
The point is, they were free to do so.
And if you don't think conservatives do not or have never enjoyed, "wild music, wild sex and drugs," you are laughably uninformed.
Skippy| 7.31.12 @ 4:26PM
We don't hate the Beatles.
Just you.
btims86| 7.31.12 @ 6:57AM
It was the most embarassing opening ceremoney I've ever seen.....then again, I haven't seen the Olympics in at least 15 years. It's 99% total feel-good, human interest, tear-jerker crap.
Dodd2| 7.31.12 @ 7:30AM
So Mr. Lord, enlighten us.. Just what was so tasteless about Greek Olympian Voula Papachristou tweet?
Or in your politically correct mindset, should one merely keep their head in the sand as their country gets overrun by Third Worlders and not say a peep?
TLP| 7.31.12 @ 8:15AM
And, there you have it.
Why would they "Celebrate Freedom" in a Country that doesn't have any?
I know they don't have Freedom of Speech, and they can't own a Firearm to Protect their Families from any Stray Jihadist that might wander in from Londanistan. And, I'm not sure if they are Free to Assemble, unless their faces look like the back end of a Goat, they have Sex with their Dead Wives, or they like to bury their Women up to their necks, when starting a Rock Garden at their Flat.
They did Celebrate their Free Medical System. If you can call an 80% Tax Rate -Free?
I liked all of the "Patients" being wheeled out on the Gurneys. I'm assuming that was to "Celebrate" the Rationing Bodies involved, in the Free Health Care, and that these people were "Symbolically" being wheeled off to someplace they could WAIT for 8 or 9 Months before getting a Procedure.
Then again...It could have just been a Representation of Britain's National Health Care System, wheeling the Free People of England to the Coffin Stores, to pick out the one they like, after being DENIED ACCESS to their Free Healthcare, for one reason, or another.
And yet, we would Copy Them in this Endeavor.
England lost her Freedoms, long ago.
It's a shame that we seem Determined to emulate them at that, as well.
Von Mises Jr| 7.31.12 @ 7:50AM
Liberty and prosperity are indirectly correlated to omnipotent government. Mises explains that free markets and free trade eliminate war. If the European governments had simply allowed individuals to produce and trade freely, there would have been no need for two World Wars.
But when omnipotent government impoverishes their people with domestic and international regulations and restrictions, the only source of wealth becomes conquest. Both the totalitarian regimes of the Soviet Union and the Nazis were aggressive chauvinist, nationalist pan-movements to conquer the world and impose their omnipotent government upon others. Without these authoritarian governments, Napoleon's conquest, as well as both World Wars would have been unnecessary and unwanted.
If Mises is correct, and I am sure he is; centrally planned omnipotent government will lead your children or grandchildren into WWIII.
Reggie Love| 7.31.12 @ 8:38AM
Good article. I still hate the Beatles though.
Louis Jenkins| 7.31.12 @ 9:06AM
Perhaps, instead of the Queen parachuting out of a helicopter, they should of had Chamberlain landing at the airport. Peace in our own time! And their own time lasted but a short breath. I found the entire opening ceremony an insult to one's intelligence, as it was made up of imaginary characters, including the sleeping children and the attentive nurses and doctors. Truth be known there were probably more doctors on stage than in the entire kingdom. The iron workers forging the rings was tolerable. That should have been the end, but no, a queen skydiving? And once in her seat she looked somewhat dissatisfied, and perhaps her bowels were disturbing her well deserved rest. And teams that have to scratch out a contestants if more than two place, well, that's another problem. Can't have too many contestants from one nation in a session now can we. (Arises from the everybody gets a medal concept.) The olympic committee is the one having bowel troubles.
Pooch Perfect| 7.31.12 @ 9:14AM
Milord,
I beg you, milord, to substitute another photo for the one displayed above. The expression on your face is, as I have said before, slightly ridiculous.
Excuse me for speaking my mind, milord,
but I was thinking that perhaps you have one that shows you looking directly into the camera with a composed, relaxed expression. That would be more appropriate. Agree?
Love the hair, though. That lustre! So shiney and brilliantly white. Could you please share with your readers the name of the shampoo you use.
PCC| 7.31.12 @ 11:04AM
Another fine article by Mr. Lord.
However, I disagree that it failed to draw a bright distinction between the authoritarian Chinese display in 2008 versus London's celebration of democratic creativity and freedom.
Houdini| 7.31.12 @ 11:20AM
Good article. The opening ceremony was akin to the smoke and mirrors we were subjected to in 08. How in God's name could we as a country elect the village idiot to the Presidency? Listening to Matt Lauer gush about the national healthcare system in Britain was disgusting. If you would have told me 40 years ago that we would fall this far I would have wondered why you had not yet been committed to the asylum, and yet here we are. Somehow we either figure out a way to turn this ship around or it's over. Someday I'm going to have to face my father and grandfather, who fought in two world wars, once again, and I'd rather not have to explain how my generation allowed the country they served to be destroyed.
Who Knows?| 7.31.12 @ 11:40AM
There is freedom, and then there is Freedom.
First, thanks for the fine conventional wisdom about the dire condition of freedom, as epitomized by the fools on the Olympic committee.
Eternal vigilance---what a price to pay!
Why, “I” only live for a pitifully few years, not eternally!
Who is free? How so? Free of what? From what? To do what? To be what? As what? Between what or who?
Consider your own prepositions—under, over, around, beneath, etc.
The biggies are of speech, of religion, of association and from want. Note the last one---the big FROM!
It’s the core animating belief of socialists like Obama.
However, true Freedom is spiritual. And, the level of spiritual maturity of Mankind, in 2012---practically nonexistent, except in rare pockets of resistance to the shouting priests, be them from Christianity, Islam, or even and especially Atheism---China, Putin, et al.
From “The Central Philosophy of Buddhism” by T.R.V. Murti, 1955, the chapter “Dialectic and Freedom”, page 258—
Who Knows?| 7.31.12 @ 11:41AM
“The so-called four freedoms—freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of worship and freedom from want---are all secular. Attainment of them is only a means, not the final value. At best, they provide facilities for the group or the individual to realize his highest destiny. The freedoms represent particular and partial satisfactions; many, if not all of them, are liable to abuse. Freedom of speech as exercised by moderns—by the press and the platform—is largely propaganda, an instrument to further partisan interests. …The freedoms to be exercised in the truest interests of humanity, of all beings, presuppose a passionless and disinterested outlook free from every vestige of egoism. They all imply spiritual freedom. And only the individual can be free spiritually.”
So what, eh?
Petronius| 7.31.12 @ 12:23PM
WK pegged it. Freedom to the lost generations behind us and most of the boomers means Freedom From having to do for themselves. They have turned government here into a clone of Sweden. They refuse to compete. They believe in an economic fairy tale first expressed in the Leveler Papers of 1640. Government to them is a substitute for Mommy to hold their hands and pay them benefits from Our taxes so they can put their feet up and stare at the idiot lantern watching Jerry Springer while waiting for the one day they will get off their worthless rear ends to vote for more and higher benefits to be taken from the producers with no consideration for their willingness to pay. I won't speak of their ingratitude. They are taking what they believe they are owed from their betters. It's long passed time the producers sent them a message that will make them load their Pampers Sr.'s "We quit!!" Let's have a national lockout. Starve the beast of redistribution so the parasites in our midst starve too. They deserve no less. It always happens when the trash elements of a population take down a culture and ruin the economy. Let it come.
Seek| 7.31.12 @ 2:50PM
No ad hominem caricaturing here, I take it.