The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Car Guy

Clover Conditioning

A Saturday at the Court-Community Corrections Program Driver Improvement course.

It is not enough that we break the heretic. We must make him one of us. Words to that effect, as spoken by the character O’Brien to Winston Smith in 1984. Or the off-duty cop running the Court-Community Corrections Program Driver Improvement course I attend this past Saturday. All eight hours’ worth.

I played the part of a good Clover (see here for an explication of Cloverism) for an entire Saturday — pretending to agree (obligatory) with every jot and tittle of “safety” drivel — in order to disappear a ticket I got a few months prior. Yes, even when you carry a V1 — the finest radar detector on the market — you are not invincible. Sometimes, it’s just not your day. And then, it’s your turn. A guy in a big SUV pulled out right in front of my car, forcing me to brake hard to avoid him. Annoyed, I broke left and passed the SUV. At just that moment, Officer Stand and Deliver happened to be coming out of a nearby side street. He was perfectly positioned to see me exceed the ridiculous 35 MPH speed limit (50 yards behind me, this same stretch of road is posted 45 and of course traffic is moving closer to 50) as I maneuvered around the obese SmooVee. He painted me with his instant-on and though the V1 chirped furiously, it was already too late.

Fifteen minutes later, I had a piece of payin’ paper. My first one in six years.

So, I went to court — because it is always worth going to court. Anything less than a pristine DMV rap sheet and you run the risk of an “adjustment” by your insurance company — no matter that you’ve never so much as scuffed a fender. So, fight every one. I do. And one strategy — or at least, an end run — is to try to get the judge to send you for a day of Clover Conditioning — oops, “driving school” — upon successful completion of which the ticket, and the record of it having ever been issued, goes away. You waste a day to keep the insurance company away. Or at least, keep their assaults on your wallet to a relative minimum.

So, on a perfectly fine Saturday morning at 8 o’ clock sharp, I found myself among 17 penitents awaiting expiation of our sins at the Cardinal Criminal Justice Academy, room 101 (well, okay, room number three — but you get the drift).

What do you spend the next eight hours doing? If you’re among the damned, you spend it listening to a clearly bored off-duty cop go through the mantra: Speed kills. All traffic laws, no matter how absurd (such as coming to a complete stop at the top of a slick hill in winter and thereby losing your momentum and becoming stuck or – worse — sliding backward, because there’s a “stop” sign at the top of the hill) must be obeyed always and every time. All laws are necessary — and righteous — laws. Never exercise judgment or initiative. Just… obey.

You know the drill.

We were each given a workbook of the short bus, fill-in-the-blanks variety. The cop/instructor going over each item in agonizing — because endless — detail. Some of the stuff was not idiotic — but it was idiotically obvious. Example: The following hazards are common in rural areas when driving: Curves. Tractors. Wildlife and livestock. Hills.

At a green light you may go if the way is … (fill in the blank).

Seriously.

But the Clover Conditioning was the part that was interesting. Among the highlights: 

* Informing the class — implicitly — that air bags trump controlling the car: Remember the old Ten and Two hands-on-the-wheel sweet spot? For decades, student drivers were told to place their hands in those positions (coinciding with clock positions) because it was the best position for maintaining control of the car. It still is — but you’re now told to do otherwise. Eight and Four is where it’s at — because of the air bag that’s in the steering wheel. If you keep ‘em at Ten and Two and the bag goes off, you’re more likely to end up with a broken wrist and burns (from the explosive inflator in the air bag). I had to choke down the urge to ask the cop whether it might not be, you know, safer to keep one’s hands at the old Ten and Two — and thereby decrease the odds of the airbag going off in the first place.

* The Lies: Our cop instructor told at least one outright lie. Or at the least, he was grossly misinformed. He was talking about traffic lights — and yellow signal timing. He said: “Yellow lights are designed to give you adequate time to come to an appropriate stop.” Apparently, our instructor was unaware of the fact that in numerous places all around the country where red light-running cameras have been installed, yellow intervals were reduced — with the result being that the driver faced the Hobson’s Choice of running the light and risking a ticket, or coming to an abrupt stop and risking being rear-ended by the car behind them. (See here,

for example.) Sometimes, it’s safer to clear the intersection. But the fact is that “the law” — and revenue — often trumps safety.

That’s a fact Clovers should chew over a bit.

Page: 1 2 3  

About the Author

Eric Peters is an automotive columnist and author of Automotive Atrocities: The Cars You Love to Hate (Motor Books International) and a new book, Road Hogs.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (8) |

Appleby| 7.17.12 @ 7:42AM

I failed my first driving test because my Dad, a dirt track stock car driver, taught me the Rules of the Road that Mr. Peters espouses herein. I took my driving test on a 1964 Galaxie 500XL with dual four-barrels and a Lincoln Hemi engine, and I scared the bejeezis out of the examiner, including a handbrake turn I did when he signalled a turn when I was already past the apex.

I learned the lesson that Dad had not taught me: that you have to pass the test by giving them back what they want to hear, even if you "know better." And Dad had a story he dined out on until the day he died -- watching his 17 year old daughter do a handbrake turn in traffic as she came back to fail her driving test and hear the parting words "Don't ever bring this car OR HER back here again."

JimH| 7.17.12 @ 9:42AM

OK, we get it. Traffic laws are not there primarily to promote safety, but to raise revenue and increase insurance rates. You, like Rain Man are an excellent driver. It’s just all the other idiots causing the problem. How about this for a proposal, we eliminate all speed regulations, maybe all traffic laws. We also get rid of no fault insurance and far more strictly enforce the liability of the person determined to be at fault in an accident. We do this to the point where if you are responsible for causing a death your life is forfeit as well. I suspect that when people are not so insulated from the consequences of their actions by their insurance and lax vehicular homicide laws they will be far more careful on the road.

lost| 7.17.12 @ 3:32PM

Sorry but traffic laws can not always be followed blindly, drives have to make judgement calls. Don't believe me well I can give an example: Many highways have minimum speed limits but there are times where road conditions do not allow for that speed. So now what do you do drive safely and disobey the posted speed limits or obey the posted speed limits and drive too fast for conditions. Either way you are now breaking the law.

mike 3/505| 7.17.12 @ 10:24AM

Driving at "excessive" speed has never at anytime killed anyone, ever.

Moe Blotz| 7.17.12 @ 10:25AM

Control your road rage Eric, and you won't get those invitations to class that you don't want. Do you lose your temper around big trucks as well? Blowing past an Assyouvee and hitting 50 in a 35 mph zone tells me you are the problem, even if the dough head in the other vehicle did something stupid. Being in control of your vehicle includes being in control of your own head.

John Navratil| 7.17.12 @ 3:35PM

Moe Blotz,

We all can't be saints. One does wonder why Officer Safe T. First wasn't paying attention to the SUV pulling into a moving lane of traffic without yielding. That might just be the greater affront to safety, don't you think?

But, it's a judgement thing. The radar machine makes judgement unnecessary. It's all a part of the same story. Dumb everyone down, reduce everything to a check box on a sheet of paper and, by all means, stamp out all personal judgement.

Stilton A. Cheese| 7.17.12 @ 10:34AM

The *Old Ten and Two* has been replaced by *Nine and Three* by drives who drive in a *sporty* manner. Try it, you'll like it.

Archie| 7.17.12 @ 9:46PM

Where do you live?

"what one should do when caught behind a tractor doing 5-7 MPH on a country road with a 55 MPH limit where there is a double line and so no legal passing zone. Even if it's clearly clear for the next two miles -- no opposing traffic coming -- the cops said: Be patient. Do not pass."

C'mon! 2 miles clear and double lines. Not likely.

More Articles by Eric Peters

More Articles From Car Guy

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/07/17/clover-conditioning

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT