PARIS — There were questionable calls, but that is the way the
breaks go in tennis and in the end it is not refereeing that makes
a difference. Gottfried von Cramm, the great German champion, told
his friend Don Budge, the best American player of the 1930s, that
he should not call his own shot out, if the ump called it in (Budge
was a good sport and did not want unearned points.) His argument
had to do with respect for authority, a very German attitude.
Budge got the idea, stopped arguing with line referees and umps
and Von Cramm — who was married to a Jewess though he was, in
fact, a bit ambiguous in s*x matters —eventually rebelled against
the authority of the German state, to the extent it was represented
by Nazis. He plotted against them. This was, of course — he was of
an old and noble family — after doing his duty in the death plains
of the eastern front against the Slavs, returning home severely
wounded, yet requesting further combat duty. He somehow survived
that and the purge of aristocrats that followed the attempt on
Hitler’s life, survived the war.
Knowing when not to protest authority is a sign of good
upbringing.
Nonetheless, I do not think Petra Kvitova was wrong to question
some of the calls during her semi-final match against Maria
Sharapova at the French Open, formally the Internationaux de
France. The shots were very close and in a baseball game, you
may be sure, someone would have yelled kill the umpire or offered
to lend him a pair of glasses. Petra, a very pretty and
fantastically agile and lean and tall Moravian girl of only 22, who
lost to Sharapova at the Australian Open as well as at Stuttgart
this year, had her eye on the ball and she saw where the damn thing
went, for Heaven’s sake. As a Czech, she was not about to start a
revolution or some such against the powers of this world. That is
not the Czech way, notwithstanding the Prague Spring, which frankly
was on a level different from the Cairo one or even the Tunis one
that, so far, is the only one among those much heralded springs in
non-tennis playing countries that seems to have led to some sort of
summer.
The point is that Maria, who takes over the No. 1 WTA ranking
from the floundering Viktoria Azarenka, who basically bombed out
here, played a better match, and no matter the calls, she was from
the start on course to win.
For one thing, her serve was on. Maria’s serve has been an
“issue” during most of her career, but in her remarkable run of the
past two weeks, it has been on target and effective, and it was
fitting that she hit an ace on the last point against Petra. She
was, from the service onward, or from the return of serve onward,
in control of the point. She set the rhythm, fast-and-deep or
game-of-chicken, volley or baseline, crosscourt or down-the-line.
She hits errors, but more often she puts the shots where she wants
them and is not afraid to risk close ones: she is determined, even
ruthless, not the kind of player who lets the other player beat
herself.
Petra was good; in many
regards, you could argue she played better than she did in her
quarter-final against the Russian Kazakh, or at least I think she
is a Russian Kazakh, Yaroslava Shvedova, a wonderfully good
natured, fresh faced girl, young lady I mean, with colorful glasses
(like the wonderfully good natured, fresh faced Serb boy, young man
I mean, Janko Tipsarevic, who fell before the mighty Nicolas
Almagro after a great run that helped dash American hopes when he
met the promising but deflating Sam Querrey last week. No, sir, I
never thought Yaroslava had a chance against Petra, but Petra it
has to be said played a funny match, mixing the horrible and the
sublime but so clearly outclassing the pretty Kazakh (who I think
is really Russian, but who are we to say — we, a nation of melted
immigrants?) that it scarcely mattered.
Against Maria, it did. Boy, did it. Maria — and mind, she was
not quite as good as Natalie Wood in the role by that name, but who
ever has been? — was on point, on target, on her game. Maria
Sharapova wanted to be number one Thursday night, preparatory to
winning the Mousequetaire trophy (ladies’ division) on Saturday,
and nothing was going to stop her. It is the one trophy she has not
won in her young but illustrious career. She is the kind of woman
who gets what she wants. She is the diva of this tournament, the
ice queen and the tsarina, a Russian-American girl or an American
Russian girl, you figure it out, but nothing, in either
hyphenation, is going to stop her. She goes up against a little
piece of Italian charm on the weekend, Sara the Sam killer, and you
can guess what will happen.
Observe that Sam — Samantha Stosur, the fair and fresh faced
beauty from Australia who won the last U.S. Open — by all rights
was scheduled to meet Maria Sharapova, the Florida princess from
Nyagan, tall and graceful and lean and yet ice-cold and hard as
steel with the ability to unleash her passions like some sort of —
what else can one say? — Tolstoyan heroine (in Tolstoy, the women
are filled with passion, in Dostoevsky, the men), and when that
happens, what can a little Czech girl do but fight, fall, and
promise to fight another day.
Nyagan: that is Siberia. No wonder she likes Florida. But keep
this in mind, you can take the girl out of Siberia but, yes, you
know the rest. Petra is Moravian, she understands the Slavic — and
perhaps even the Siberian, though perhaps not the Floridian —
mind, and it seemed, from some distance away in the bleachers, that
she knew what was coming. She fought hard. Petra Kvitova, nearly
the same height as Maria at over six feet, a little heavier though
she looks just as slim with those long legs, perhaps a bit rounder,
babyfattish as we used to say, around the hips, long legs long arms
long blonde hair, Petra is a girl of Central Europe where Maria has
that fierce from-the-steppes look, albeit tempered by Florida’s
shopping malls. Maria will have won three times as much money, at
least, for playing tennis this year alone as Petra, by the time
this tournament is over. Good for her. Three million clams, and
every penny earned the hard ruthless way of the steppes.
Maria is so dominant this year she does not even seem to work at
winning, though of course that is the surest sign she works harder
than anyone else. Sara Errani has been working very hard too, and
earning more than the favorite, Samantha Stosur, whom she beat in
three sets. When Sam settled down and played, she was invincible,
crushing Sara 6-1 in the second with reliable, calm and strong
place shots anywhere she wanted them, notably right next to the
baseline. For a reason no one can explain, she could not keep this
up and went wild in the third — to be sure, Sara was playing well
and taking every opportunity to hit hard — and everything seemed
to be going out of bounds.
Comparing the two semi-finals, one cannot seriously doubt the
outcome of the next ladies’ match, but in tennis doubts are always
in order. The mighty Bryan brothers, Mike and Bob, advanced to
their own final in the men’s doubles, the only Americans still
standing outside the juniors, where one of our young hopes,
Mitchell Krueger, is still in contention, but even there, the
doubts surfaced when the Dutch-Pak team of Jean-Julien Rojer and
Aisam ul-Haq Qureshi held their service games to the end of their
second losing set, forcing one of the best men’s doubles team in
the history of doubles to resort to a tiebreak. And they must face
the formidable combo of Max Mirnyi and Daniel Nestor before they
can go home.
However, the ladies were the stars on Thursday, and perhaps for
this reason they were featured at Chatrier’s center court rather
than the smaller, better for close observers of the game, court at
Suzanne-Lenglen stadium, named of course for the French legend of
the 1920s and '30s. In the spirit of things, the hosts (the French
Tennis Federation) had some more recent legends on hand, Martina
Navratilova among others, and provided booths for guests to do
their nails, if I understood correctly, and other things women do.
This is a classy city, where women do those things. And they play
great tennis.
Mistral| 6.8.12 @ 6:40AM
I will not be viewing - Sharapova makes too much noise on court. I prefer quieter players.
Gr0w1er601| 6.9.12 @ 1:51PM
Yeah- what's with all the 'grunting' nowadays?
Roscoe| 6.9.12 @ 7:01PM
Roger, sometimes a simple full stop can be a beautiful thing. You shouldn't be afraid of it.