The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Eminentoes
Print Email
Text Size

Eminentoes

Absolutely Fabulist

Stephen Glass is back, with a new bandwagon of defenders.

(Page 3 of 3)

But maybe that’s not necessary, because we’re all thinking in this forward frame of mind, right? Glass has changed, or so he claims, so we should look at how (as Nocera puts it) he’s turned his life around.

But if we are to move forward, why does Glass dedicate such an immense volume of his testimony on his past? He turns to blaming his parents, whom he describes as controlling and vindictive, as they applied pressure for him to go to medical school. He cites the rejection of his childhood classmates. No slight in his past is left untouched, revealing that Glass is still hoping to distract you from his shortcomings by portraying himself as a victim. Classic.

The Times’s Nocera claims that viewing these anecdotes as “excuses” (as Shafer does) is a “serious misreading” of Glass’s testimony, because Glass “seems to go out of his way to not make excuses for what he did.” But even if these aren’t excuses and merely biographical points explaining how Glass disgraced himself, one must wrestle with the fact that Glass has been the compulsive liar and abused child-victim of his parents for longer than he’s been the penitent law clerk.

Addicts like this are never actually cured, they’re just recovering. When Nocera writes “People who know him tell me that he is ‘relentlessly honest.’ Having once been a pathological liar, he now won’t tell even the tiniest of white lies,” it sounds like the description of the recovering alcoholic who lacks the self-control to stop drinking once he starts. Should California tell potential clients that they can trust someone so publicly standing on that rain-slick precipice?

That it took until only two years ago for Glass to “fully” catalog his transgressions, and only as part of his effort to become an attorney, is damning. But what’s even more damning is that Glass has found yet another area where he can cling to the status of victim, skate along the hard-earned reputations of others, and force a showdown, not about justice, but about himself.

This was as true 10 years ago as it is now. It almost makes you wonder about his author description for The Fabulist, which appears on Amazon: “Formerly a journalist, Stephen Glass is currently at work on his second novel.” Yes, he sure is.

Page:   1 23

About the Author

J.P. Freire is a writer in Washington and a former editor at the Washington Examiner and The American Spectator. You can follow him on Twitter @jpfreire.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (28) |

Tina B| 12.28.11 @ 7:51AM

Wonderful, and now we will find out if Californians in judicial power (SCOTSOC) know anything about ethics at all. I am pleasantly surprised to read that the California Bar Courts factored real ethics into the equation, but I seriously doubt that the political apointees in their Supreme Court will do the same.

Great article, btw. I have followed the Glass story all along, but refused to read his book. Maybe now that I know it's Seymour's lying view of things, and his defense statement to the public, I'm more interested in checking it out, from the library, of course.

Nancy in NC| 12.28.11 @ 8:53AM

Count me out of the loop but I've never heard of Stephen Glass. He sounds "lovely"...another cry baby, refusing to take consequences for his lousy behavior. Typical of the left wing, and often, Americans in general.

KyMouse| 12.28.11 @ 1:58PM

Nancy, rent the movie "Shattered Glass" from Netflix or other places. It's a good movie in its own right, and it also tells Glass's story well.

Gonzo journalism, in which style is far more important than substance (including accuracy and facts) seems to be part and parcel of the Glass kind of person. Imagine doing what he did -- lying to the public as well as to his friends and coworkers repeatedly -- and painting yourself simply as a "fabulist," not a liar and dishonorable deceiver. Glass showed that it can be done, unfortunately.

Cromulent| 12.28.11 @ 9:54AM

Richard Blow? That's gotta be a joke name.

Bill| 12.28.11 @ 9:55AM

Stephen Glass writes a novel about a guy who, instead of going to law school works in a video store, patronizes Vietnamese (why is it important that they be Vietnamese?) masseuses, and goes to strip clubs, and that's a hip life? Well, OK. It's been a long time since I lived the New York City life.

But it resounds when you read the guy who wrote:
"Here is a more troubling thought: Maybe Shattered Glass is right, and my memory has deceived me. Maybe this Steve is the real one. Maybe Steve was creepy in his insecurity; maybe he was constantly manipulating us emotionally, and maybe we were too stupid to notice."

I was going to write "Duh."

Moe Blotz| 12.28.11 @ 10:50AM

From what I have learned reading about the bloke, I suggest Steven Glass is angling to become a politician. He would be a perfect fit as a Democrat from California.

TrueBlue| 12.29.11 @ 2:01PM

Truth. He can use all these mean people keeping him from becoming a lawyer in a story of how "The Man" has been trying to keep him down and how he'd fight against it for other people if they'd just vote for him.

Woodrow| 12.28.11 @ 10:54AM

Thanks for this interesting update on Stephen Glass. I found the film, "Shattered Glass" quite good, and it's satisfying to learn that this serial liar is finding trouble passing the bar. He might make a good politician, where it seems truthfulness is not a requirement for the job.

Aces and Eights| 12.28.11 @ 10:55AM

Who in Hell is Stephen Glass?!

Drunken Sailor| 12.28.11 @ 12:41PM

Who in the hell cares?

Tina B| 12.28.11 @ 12:43PM

Just another journalist asshole.

Bill| 12.28.11 @ 2:05PM

Stephen Glass made a sizeable splash when it was discovered that, during his time as a reporter for The New Republic, a magazine of liberal political commentary, he published story after story that had been vetted for its authenticity and truth, many turning out to be entirely made up. The story that got him exposed was a story he made up about a convention of computer hackers and a particular hacker who managed to parlay getting caught hacking into some high-profile computer system into a high-paying job.

Glass went on to write lying stories for other periodicals, but now that he's getting a bit older and can't make any hay out of his fifteen minutes of notoriety, he's learning how to pretend to be contrite.

Aces and Eights| 12.28.11 @ 3:32PM

I other words, the aforementioned Mr. Glass is noteworthy for not being particularly noteworthy. Just another overeducated liberal drone trying to make his way through life by hook or by crook (mostly crook), and eschewing legitimate work as much as possible.

Bill| 12.28.11 @ 5:43PM

Well, not exactly; he's noteworthy. The New Republic prided itself on its avoidance of hyperbole and lies and Stephen Glass made fools of them, particularly Martin Peretz, who ran it at the time. His noteworthiness is as a person whose needs, whatever they might have been, caused him to cause damage to a publication that made some effort to be legitimate despite its liberal tendencies, and to people who tended to that concern.

J.C.Eaton| 12.28.11 @ 11:44AM

This is why there are lawyer jokes.

Bill| 12.28.11 @ 2:22PM

He's not a lawyer yet.

Aces and Eights| 12.28.11 @ 3:34PM

Maybe we should start "lawyer candidate" jokes. How many lawyer candidates suing the Bar Association does it take to screw in a light bulb? (or simply screw other people for that matter.)

Bill| 12.28.11 @ 5:45PM

The jokes would be better aimed at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. They've established themselves as idiots long since; now it's becoming a question as to whether or not they'll establish themselves as dishonest idiots.

Bill| 12.28.11 @ 5:46PM

Perhaps I should say the California Supreme Court, who once could boast of such notable justices as Justice Traynor.

martin j smith| 12.28.11 @ 11:48AM

There are many cereal or serial liars and this Glass guy is not unique. Watch CNBC or CNN or read the NYT or WaPo I mean this guy Glass is a chip off the Socialist Block but that would also include your average Republican Establishment type as well. There is a lot lying going on out there are we are on the receiving end of all of it. Luck us.

martin j smith| 12.28.11 @ 11:51AM

And just to be fair the entire Republican Candidate line I think is one BIG LIE fo at least one reason: Mitt Romney has had no attacks compared to all of those who have been attacked like Gingrich,Cain,PerryPaul ( who I have no use for at all ). It is very obvious to me that this line of foil candidates is a set up. Nothing is inevitable except the dice and they are loaded.

Gary| 12.28.11 @ 12:30PM

This guy is a con man, pure and simple and seemingly has the requisite charm to fool so called smart people. He is a grifter but given the caliber of many in the legal "profession" (John Edwards for example) he will fit right in if admitted.

Dave Williams| 12.28.11 @ 1:21PM

Yet another turd floating to the top of the pop-cultch toilet bowl....*FLUSH*

Harry the Horrible| 12.28.11 @ 1:23PM

Personally, I think "lawyer" is a great extension of this guy's career as a liar and a fraud. He probably has a great future as a Democrat politician, too.

Ed| 12.28.11 @ 1:33PM

Isn't Martin Peretz the same guy who now rides around warning us of the same perils with Obama that conservatives warned about prior to his election (an election that he supported and he will undoubtedly vote for O again). He's a billionaire who managed to get where he was despite his stupidity.

Timeout11| 12.28.11 @ 5:56PM

I'm surprised that none of the stories I've read about this latest Glass saga use the word "sociopath". He's a classic example (See Martha Stout, The Sociopath Next Door):
1. Charm that clouds the mind. "Our Steve was a lovely, winning, hilarious, endearing person."
2. The Pity Play. "...Glass is still hoping to distract you from his shortcomings by portraying himself as a victim."
3. Pathological liar.

Lon Mead| 12.31.11 @ 5:29AM

Another important consideration is that it wasn't just that he fabricated the stories, he manufactured evidence to back them up (faked business cards, voice-mails, a website - he even had his brother play a "source" for a phone call). Read Jack Shafer's article (linked above) and you see that that Glass is still doing the same thing that made his "stories" interesting, but also got him busted - the inclusion of interesting anecdotes full of first-name-only or no-name characters (see the part about the Life Studies class when he was in high school - I'd pay to hear what that teacher had to say about what happened, IF it happened).

To receive forgiveness requires contrition, and everything I've seen about Glass over the years tells me he is not truly contrite.

More Articles by J.P. Freire

More Articles From Eminentoes

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/12/28/absolutely-fabulist

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT