The rumors of Vladimir Putin’s vast fortune held in secret bank
accounts in Western banks have been around for years. Such stories
titillated the foreign press and the denizens of cocktail parties
of Moscow, but nothing solid was uncovered. Even the expatriate
oligarchs now living in the West with their billions had remained
carefully silent in spite of — or because of — their animosity
toward Putin. This has all changed.
The Russian public recently began to sense there was
greater weight to these rumors of their muscular leader’s business
interests, and they were right. The first detailed account of
private financial connections with ties to Putin was made public by
a former St. Petersburg banker, Sergei Kolesnikov, who fled to
Turkey and eventually to the United States. Britain’s Financial
Times joined with Kolesnikov to
put together an analysis of his information after he shared his
briefcase of documents with Turkish, British and American security
officials — and the obligatory
brief interview with the Washington Post. The business
and intelligence world in and outside Russia has been buzzing with
the intricacies of the “wheeling and dealing” of Vlad, his family
and friends ever since.
The bottom line — and that’s a particularly appropriate
term to use — is that two men with insider relationships with Bank
Rossiya in St. Petersburg bought shares in this bank with money
funneled to them from offshore companies through a phony order to
buy equipment for that city’s hospitals. One of these men, Dmitry
Gorelov, was a former KGB colonel, reportedly a trusted
acquaintance of Putin .
From this point further investments from similar offshore
companies were transferred under cover of Bank Rossiya to purchase
assets from the gas giant, Gazprom, of which Dmitry Medvedev, a
corporate lawyer, was chairman before he became Putin’s chief of
staff. Added to this mix at a later date was Mikhail Shelomov, a
grandson of Putin’s uncle, who owned Aktsept, a firm that already
had a 4.5% stake in Bank Rossiya. Shares were bought by Aktsept
with money borrowed from a convenient Panamanian trading company to
obtain a 13.5% ownership of Sogaz, Gazprom’s insurance subsidiary.
And just to make things even more intriguing, another of Putin’s
cousins is also a Bank Rossiya shareholder.
Medvedev and Shelomov appear to be the key cutouts in
Vladimir Putin’s financial involvement in the growth of Bank
Rossiya and the subsequent linking of Gazprom, Gazprom Bank, Sogaz
and eventually a major Black Sea resort complex and a “palace” of
4,000 square meters for Putin. This massive mansion was built by
construction teams of the presidential guard service. The word of
the new facility for Putin could not be hidden and one Nikolai
Shamalov had his name placed on the title when it was sold to
another businessman. Shamalov was the original partner with ex-KGB
Colonel Gorelov in the hospital equipment funds scam and co-founder
with one Yury Kovalchuk and Vladimir Putin in a lakeside
dacha enclave outside St. Petersburg in the 1990s. Kovalchuk and
Shamalov are now two of the largest shareholders in Bank
Rossiya.
This complicated financial networking is indicative of the
type of activity now seeing the light of day as the expected easy
transition of Putin back into the presidency in March has stumbled.
The recent parliamentary polls show Putin’s party, United Russia,
with a slim majority of 238 seats won out of a total of 450 seats
in the Duma. The vaunted dominance of Putin’s party has been
severely eroded. And the increased public recognition of the
reincarnation of a new financial oligarchy under Putin has been a
strong factor.
When Mayor Yuri Luzhkov was dismissed from office by
President Dmitry Medvedev last year, Luzhkov and his billionaire
wife, Yelena Baturina, vowed to get even. Medvedev had made an
issue of the history of graft and corruption of Moscow’s city
government under Luzhkov. The back-story here is that the Bank of
Moscow head, Andrei Borodin, now living outside Russia, was charged
with providing a 13 billion ruble (approx. $450 million US)
unsecured loan to Luzhkov’s wife’s construction company. The Moscow
bank was then bought out by the majority state-owned bank, VTB. For
the former mayor this was another Putin & Company slick
takeover maneuver and a personal attack on him and his
wife.
Medvedev was right, of course, but he underestimated the
ability of Moscow’s former leadership to practice the Russian
version of “payback.” The police in Moscow played right into the
hands of an opposition that had coalesced from disparate groups in
the past few weeks around the anti-Putin national opposition party,
“A Just Russia.” Luzhkov still has some assets left, according to
Moscow news sources, and he arranged to have his former
“neighborhood youth” street enforcers of his earlier days join with
the growing crowd of protesters against the “illegal” parliamentary
voting process. Effectively Luzhkov gained respectability by aiding
those demonstrating against the Putin plan for continued political
dominance. Luzhkov of course knew all about the connections of
Putin with Bank Rossiya and the other deals and remains livid over
the hypocrisy of Medvedev/Putin in kicking him out.
The publicizing of the Putin financial network has brought
into the open what many Russians had already suspected: That the
pattern of Putin behind-the-scenes financial deal making is no
longer speculation. Putin’s personal wealth development is marked
by a return of the Yeltsin-era commercial oligarch system under new
approved tycoons. It seems that the Putin-Medvedev business
conglomerate thrives even as their political magic
wanes.
Timothy L. Pennell| 12.16.11 @ 9:24AM
Now. All you have to do is replace "PUTIN", with: "OBAMA", change the names of Those Banks, to the Big Banks over here, and "Secret Bank Accounts hidden in Western Banks", to: "All of his pertinent life Documentation Sealed in a Vault in Hawaii", and you've got your next story.
Hello?
Alan Brooks| 12.17.11 @ 5:39PM
You guys naturally didn't like it when the Russkies were Communist; now that they are kleptocrats you don't like it, either.
Give the Russians a few generations before you expect them to grow wings on their backs.
Timothy L. Pennell| 12.18.11 @ 9:11AM
Not bad.
That one actually made a great point, with only one small problem.
Do we have "a few Generations" left?
Ron| 12.16.11 @ 1:03PM
This is old news...Try reading the novel "Red Mafia" by Robert I. Friedman.
It is a disturbing portrait of the rise of the US Russian mob, who used there alleged "jewish" status to emigrate to the US via Israel and set up their web here and in Canada. The Russian mafia has an amazing amount of control over the banking, Russian NHL players, etc.
It is chilling....
Radioman777| 12.16.11 @ 1:53PM
Whether it's Putin, the oligarchs or the CPSU, Russia has been run by gangsters for quite some time.
Alan Brooks| 12.17.11 @ 5:42PM
DUH!
it's a third world nation, radiobrain!
What champions of the obvious you rubes are.
Dimitry Aleksandrovich| 12.19.11 @ 6:21AM
Now you have to consider that insider trading is illegal in the United States except for members of Congress. I believe Putin is a good man, but even a good man in politics needs a contingency man. Politics is a blood sport, nothing more and nothing less.
Also it is a mistake for Westerners to believe that the protests against Putin and United Russia means that Russia is moving closer to the West. The party that took second in the number of parliamentary seats was the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (which is the conservative party of Russia given that its only been 20 years since the collapse of the Soviet Union). The party that came in third was "A Just Russia" which is a Russian socialist party that is also not pro-Western. The party that came in third was the Liberal Democratic Party of Vladimir Zhirinovsky which the West considers an "ultra-nationalist" right wing party that is openly hostile to the West. What do all three parties have in common? All three are anti-Western. All three are anti-capitalist and all three are opposed to Russia's continued privatization of key Russian industries and want to bridge the gap between Russia's rich and poor. I am sure that Putin pushing for Russia's ascension to the WTO is also being met with skepticism amongst these three parties. So I see the elections as a backlash against United Russia's Western like liberal economic reforms as well as with corruption which is endemic across the country (and was during Gorbachev's time too) and the oligarchs that continue to operate in the country as long as they are loyal to the Kremlin. This opposition to Putin and United Russia is not pro-American in the least bit, but a left wing backlash to Russia's economic woes.
Now returning to my original statements I believe Putin is a good man and the right man for Russia at this time, but I believe these election results were a wake up call for Medvedev and Putin and United Russia in general that they need to do more to reign in all the oligarchs and to bring the corruption under control and to inact measures to bridge the gap between the rich and poor in Russia. Like the average American the average Russian needs decent paying jobs to provide for a future family.