The big question conservatives must answer is, “Freedom
for what?” Freedom should not be license to become libertine, but
to do what’s right. “For you were called to freedom, brothers,” the
Apostle Paul writes. “Only do not use your freedom as an
opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one
another.”
Andrews suggests that conservatives — and, more broadly,
Americans — return to such an ethic. “What government should or
shouldn’t do is an important question for keeping America true to
itself,” he writes. “But too narrow a focus on that question has
tended to distract conservatives from one that’s even more
important: What qualities of character are essential to sustain
a free and good society?” (Emphasis in original.)
Along those lines, Andrews’ prescription for cultural and
economic renewal in the United States is, first, personal and,
second, political. He calls for strengthening families, expanding
charity, expecting more of churches, and renewing a common culture.
“The higher we score on the scale of character,” he writes, “the
more fit we are for freedom — and the less need there is for
intrusive restrictions by government.”
Responsibility Reborn is an
excellent charter for the responsibility movement. Despite the
challenges of contemporary political life and the excesses of
American culture, Andrews’ treatise is infused with optimism. The
next few years are critical in determining whether America will
stagnate or see a rebirth of responsibility.
“It’s a great time to be alive,” Andrews writes. “Now
comes the decade of decision.”
Peppermint Tea| 12.5.11 @ 10:04AM
The telling statistic is out-of-wedlock births, now over 42 percent of all births and climbing 1 percent each year. This is the ultimate measurement of "personal responsibility" and the US is failing with black and Hispanic women leading the way, but followed closely by the white population. Other than Rick Santorum hinting, has any other of our major candidates addressed this? I didn't think so.
Alan Brooks| 12.5.11 @ 10:08AM
The American Dream ended when the Cold War ended because you don't have a focused enemy now--that's why it is called multilateralism.
race_to_the_bottom| 12.5.11 @ 2:29PM
The percentage of children living with one parent only has been stable since the mid 90s.
http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2.....0-to-2009/
So you are a single woman and you want to have a child, but there are no "marriageable" men around. In the case of Black women, a high proportion of Black men are either packed away in prison, on parole or probation, and therefore chronically unemployed, since there is no law against discrimination against ex-offenders. What do you do?
I really do think that it is a huge problem that boys grow up without stable relationships with adult men in the community. There has never been a culture like this, and the results are all around us. But it has nothing to do with personal responsibility, in most cases, but the reality of our society. Unemployment, low wages, long hours, no time off for children, no child care, no organized activities for the youth. Every dime that is not nailed down in this country goes to the parasitical FIRE sector of the economy. THIS is the crux of the problem.
Conservablogger | 12.5.11 @ 3:50PM
Society is a reflection of the individuals within it. To say that society's ills aren't the result of individual actions is absurd. You brought up the lack of "marriageable" black men for black women. Why should black women restrict themselves to just marrying black men? Heterosexual marriage is a cornerstone of society, and all that's necessary for that is one man and one woman making a covenant to one another for the remainder of their natural lives. There's nothing in there about race or skin color. I could give other examples, but sitting around wringing your hands about "society" only shifts responsibility from the individual to the collective. If you have identified the lack of "marriageable" men in society, why don't you do something about it? That's the point of the article: we are sitting around waiting for someone else (ie, gubmint) to do something, when we could try to solve the issue on our own.
Lyneuss Fields | 12.5.11 @ 10:26AM
Well here we go again. Let's blame it all on lack of personal responsibility (self-reliance) and forget about the 8000-point stock market drop and Wall Street's debacle. Hey, many are wondering when W. Bush's unfunded tax breaks--tacked onto the national debt—are going to be paid back to America's treasury? http://lyneussfields.blogspot......their.html
TrueBlue| 12.5.11 @ 12:20PM
He never said blame it all, he was merely pointing out that correcting our problems STARTS with taking responsibility for our actions. The Crony Capitalism and those who participate in it are lacking in morals, that's the problem. They do what they do for themselves and to heck with everyone else. Get people back on track to doing what is right and not just what they feel they want and you'll deal with a good portion of that.
As for those "unfunded" tax breaks, they are covered by the revenue increases they caused. People just don't notice them because government spending went up at the same time, because that is what the government does. The majority of small businesses (you know, those places that employ the majority of the country) file their taxes under personal income, generally in the $250k+ a year category; the same category that Obama and the Dems want to tax all to hell... coincidence?
Jim| 12.5.11 @ 12:58PM
Wow, Bush again. Perhaps when we are all dead, and others are living in the 23rd century, none of the libs will remember Bush, and the poor, dumb bast*rds will have to find a new scapegoat.
JeffB| 12.5.11 @ 3:11PM
Makes sense.
" My 401k just dropped 20%, I better go out and have a bunch of kids to increase my WIC paymebts."
Naturalborn Texicanette| 12.5.11 @ 2:47PM
Loss of morals and values.
Loss of any kind of self-respect.
Loss of humanity, People are becoming more and more animalistic, wanting their share of the bone and willing to do any kind of bodily harm that gets in the way of getting that bone.
No intergity. No honesty. No respect for anything or anybody.
Godless. Hopeless. Meaningless. Worthless.
The sadest kind of sad that there is.......................
Naturalborn Texicanette| 12.5.11 @ 2:49PM
P.S. Obama HUGELY out "worsens" Bush in any way, shape, or form.
I'd take "W" over Obama in a heart beat!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gary B| 12.5.11 @ 7:14PM
Finally, someone raises the issue of personal responsibility, the companion concept to freedom.
POST American| 12.5.11 @ 9:50PM
NO TIME for '80's Show' M-powerment
SAP OPS.
---------------Even OPRAH's retired afterall.
wedding dresses | 12.6.11 @ 3:32AM
Loss of humanity, People are becoming more and more animalistic, wanting their share of the bone and willing to do any kind of bodily harm that gets in the way of getting that bone.