The firing of Major General Peter Fuller underscores growing U.S. military disillusion with its counterinsurgency — nation-building — efforts in Afghanistan.
After all that has been said about Afghan President Hamid Karzai by U.S. military and civilian leaders, why did the Obama administration remove Major General Peter Fuller, deputy commander of the NATO training mission in Afghanistan?
Fuller, in an interview with Politico published on November 3, was highly critical of Karzai. He said, among other things, that he was upset with Karzai’s remark that Afghanistan would side with Pakistan in any war with the United States. He told Politico that Karzai was erratic, adding, “Why don’t you just poke me in the eye with a needle! You’ve got to be kidding me … I’m sorry, we just gave you $11.6 billion and now you’re telling me, ‘I don’t really care’?… When they are going to have a presidential election, you hope they get a guy that’s more articulate in public.”
Fuller also recounted a conversation with Afghan generals who quite apparently don’t understand that America’s financing of the war against the Taliban can’t go on forever: “I said, ‘You guys are isolated from reality.’ The reality is, the world economy is having some significant hiccups. The U.S. is in this [too],” Fuller told Politico, “If you’re in a very poor country like Afghanistan, you think that America has roads paved in gold, everybody lives in Hollywood. They don’t understand the sacrifices that America is making to provide for their security. And I think that’s part of my job to educate ‘em.”
Fuller was fired days later. He was impolitic toward the Afghan generals and disrespectful of Karzai. But was this worthy of removal?
Consider what else U.S. generals and diplomats have said about Karzai and his government.
In Bob Woodward’s book, Obama’s Wars, he quotes a host of them.
Then overall Afghanistan force commander Gen. David Petraeus is quoted as telling Vice President Biden and then-Defense Secretary Gates, “We’re not going to defeat the Taliban,” and “I understand the government is a criminal syndicate.”
Retired Gen. Karl Eikenberry, U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan (and a Petraeus rival), is quoted — from the same meeting — as telling Biden and Gates that we couldn’t make the troop surge work in a year because we don’t have a reliable partner in Karzai. Karzai, according to Eikenberry, is mercurial (a more polite word than erratic). “He’s on his meds, he’s off his meds,” Woodward quotes the ambassador as saying, referring to Karzai’s reported depression and medical aids.
Before Fuller, Obama fired Gen. Stanley McChrystal after an article in Rolling Stone proved too much for the president. But that was different. McChrystal wasn’t dismissive of Karzai, he was disrespectful of Biden, Eikenberry, Petraeus and other American leaders. It added up to a level of insubordination for which he had to be removed.
I will not defend Fuller. What he said weren’t things any American general should say publicly. But Fuller’s situation is different from McChrystal’s and troubling in a very different way.
What Fuller said in the conference reported by Politico could not have been spontaneous or original. He was saying things he would have certainly spoken about to his boss, Afghan Commander Gen. John Allen, as well as other peers as well as his staff. His comments, blunt but honest, reveal much about how our troops are thinking about the war they’re fighting.
There is a disease affecting our forces engaged in counterinsurgency — the military term for “nation-building — in Afghanistan. Call it “COIN fatigue.”
The symptoms of COIN fatigue are stress, doubt and anxiety. The stress and doubt result from the looming withdrawal and the knowledge that we have sacrificed much but achieved little. Anxiety is the necessary result of the first two.
However you compute its length — from 9/11 or back to the Iranian revolution of 1979 — the war in Afghanistan is part of the longest war in U.S. history. Some of our troops have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan nearly ten times in the ten years since 9/11. They go, willingly, and perform superbly. Their morale, to all outside measurements, is still very high. So why the COIN fatigue?
Americans had always fought for a clear purpose: to defeat a defined enemy and end the threat he posed to our way of life. But this war, and the way we have fought it, has never been clear. No one can get away with telling our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines that victory is just over the next hill. They would have understood if they were told that we needed to remove Saddam and set up a provisional government in Iraq. They would have understood it if we’d said that if we got bin Laden and Mullah Omar, they could leave Afghanistan and go home. But that’s not what they were told.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?