The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Campaign Crawlers
Print Email
Text Size

Campaign Crawlers

A Win-Win for Republicans

A general election today pitting two Republicans against each other, with no one else on the ballot.

LYNDEN, Washington — Last week, I stopped into Extremes Sports Grill & Pizzeria to talk to the man who very well may end up running my own little corner of the Evergreen State. Every Tuesday leading up to the election, state senator Doug Ericksen has held court there. I wanted to get his take on how the race for Whatcom County executive was progressing.

The 42-year-old Ericksen was optimistic, though guardedly so. He is a Republican, but the race for county exec is nonpartisan and Washingtons system of choosing candidates is, if anything, a disrespecter of parties. We vote for whomever we like in the primaries. The top two vote-getters from the primaries then dust it up in the general election.

In Ericksen’s race, this runoff system has created a problem for him, because the top-two vote getters are effectively Republicans. Worse, opponent Jack Louws is a former mayor of Lynden, my small town snug up against the Canadian border, which forms the natural backbone of the local Republican Party. Its harder to build from the base when the base has divided loyalties.

Over pizza and beer, Ericksen told me that having Louws as his opponent meant a radically different kind of race than if he had faced off against the Democrat-favored David Stalheim. That race, he said, would have featured months of attacks from the left followed by a 60-point landslide. Instead, the Louws-Ericksen race will be much closer and hinge on turnout.

He showed me three pieces of mail that had just gone out to people who havent yet turned in their ballots. (Washington has abolished polling places in favor of ballots that can be put in a series of drop-boxes over a rolling period.) One piece featured endorsements by prominent Republicans. Another was targeted at soft voters, though Ericksen insisted it had hard edges — including a defense of second amendment rights to go hunting.

The third piece of mail, aimed at Tea Party voters, highlighted Louwss statement that he would entertain raising taxes as soon as the economy rights itself. This may simply be a diplomatic way to avoid raising taxes while appealing to Democratic voters, but Ericksen finds it baffling. He said he had given Louws numerous attempts to back out of it. Louws had doubled down instead, so it was only fair to warn voters.

Surrounded by political aides and a rotating cast of friends and supporters, Ericksen talked informally about taxes, less restrictive land use rules, and local personalities and controversies for about an hour before he excused himself to go to his daughters soccer game. He didnt rule out a Louws victory but Ericksen argued that his more uncompromising appeal (Im not backing down) and his political organization — created during his 12 years as a state representative and one not-yet-completed term in the state senate — would give him the edge.

Ericksen pointed out that in Bellingham, Whatcom’s most populous city where Louws will have to clean up to balance out the more conservative north county vote, yard signs are pretty scarce on the ground. Thats anecdote and so is this, but its still impressive: My house has received hundreds — perhaps thousands — of political robocalls over the years. Ericksens is the first recorded message from a candidate that left me his cellphone number in case I had any concerns.

He also argued one reason that Louws may have a hard time winning the county executive seat is that hes too conservative to appeal to snobbish Bellingham liberals. Jack is still Jack, Ericksen said. Hes still pro-life. Hes still the former mayor of Lynden, and that may prove a bridge too far for many of the voters Louws needs to drive him to victory.

Ericksen is not a Tea Party candidate, per se. He was deeply involved in local Republican politics well before Rick Santellis now-famous “rant” launched a movement. But he shares many of the movements aims, including a culture that cares more about advancing principles and less about partisanship. He received the endorsement of the Republican Party, sure, but he also asked the Dems for their endorsement this June.

According to the Bellingham Herald, one incredulous Democrat in a room of about 300 shouted, Hes a Republican! Whats he doing here? Ericksen quipped. I have to admit I havent been to a Democratic meeting in a while, and then made the case for common ground. He didnt get the endorsement but he did get polite applause and a couple of hisses, and grudging respect.

And Ericksen admitted something to me before he took off for his daughters game that must have given his consultants heartburn. He would like to win the race, he said, but hes not sweating it overmuch. Hell do his best and hope for the best and, ultimately, the greater good of the people of Whatcom country will be much better served with either him or Louws as the next county exec.

About the Author

Jeremy Lott is editor of RealClearPolicy.com, RealClearBooks.com and RealClearReligion.org and associate editor of RealClearScience.com.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (4) |

RND | 11.8.11 @ 12:23PM

Mr. Lott, thank you. But shame on American Spectator.

Today is Tuesday November 8, 2011. It is election day.

Sure couldn't tell from the articles American Spectator editors decided to post.

This is why we lose. No focus. No grasp of what is going on. In Ohio. In Mississippi. In Virginia. In Washington State. In Illinois. TODAY! AT THE VOTING STATIONS!

No. We can only focus on 2012.

As if somehow a new president and cabinet change will save the country.

Mr. Lott's article is the ONLY one that even hints at an election today.

Pitiful.

Alan Brooks| 11.8.11 @ 2:35PM

Too much celebrity-culture politics, RND.
When your grandad was in the saddle it wasn't nearly as much about Hollywood, and about fame in general.

TrueBlue| 11.9.11 @ 10:46AM

Since the only things available for me to vote on this year were a few voter initiatives I can understand their disinterest in election day articles (good initiatives, but still, no people to vote for). Since it's different as to what is being voted on not just by state but by county it doesn't make sense to really even attempt the sheer number of articles it'd take to appeal to that wide of an audience.

More Articles by Jeremy Lott

More Articles From Campaign Crawlers

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/11/08/a-win-win-for-republicans

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Morning Round-Up 5-23

Patrick Ryan | 10:06AM

Morning Round-Up 5-23

Patrick Ryan | 10:06AM

Sorry, You Can’t Delegate Responsibility

Ray V. Hartwell, III | 9:10AM

Issa Recovers

Ross Kaminsky | 5.22.13

The Religion of Peace Strikes London Again

Aaron Goldstein | 5.22.13

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT