LYNDEN, Washington — Last week, I stopped into Extremes Sports
Grill & Pizzeria to talk to the man who very well may end up
running my own little corner of the Evergreen State. Every Tuesday
leading up to the election, state senator Doug Ericksen has held
court there. I wanted to get his take on how the race for Whatcom
County executive was progressing.
The 42-year-old Ericksen was optimistic, though guardedly
so. He is a Republican, but the race for county exec is nonpartisan
and Washington’s system of choosing
candidates is, if anything, a disrespecter of parties. We vote for
whomever we like in the primaries. The top two vote-getters from
the primaries then dust it up in the general election.
In Ericksen’s race, this runoff system has created a
problem for him, because the top-two vote getters are effectively
Republicans. Worse, opponent Jack Louws is a former mayor of
Lynden, my small town snug up against the Canadian border, which
forms the natural backbone of the local Republican Party.
It’s harder to build from the base when
the base has divided loyalties.
Over pizza and beer, Ericksen told me that having Louws as
his opponent meant a radically different kind of race than if he
had faced off against the Democrat-favored David Stalheim. That
race, he said, would have featured months of
“attacks from the left”
followed by a “60-point
landslide.” Instead, the Louws-Ericksen
race will be much closer and hinge on turnout.
He showed me three pieces of mail that had just gone out
to people who haven’t yet turned in their
ballots. (Washington has abolished polling places in favor of
ballots that can be put in a series of drop-boxes over a rolling
period.) One piece featured endorsements by prominent Republicans.
Another was targeted at soft voters, though Ericksen insisted it
had hard edges — including a defense of second amendment rights to
go hunting.
The third piece of mail, aimed at Tea Party voters,
highlighted Louws’s statement that he
would entertain raising taxes as soon as the economy rights itself.
This may simply be a diplomatic way to avoid raising taxes while
appealing to Democratic voters, but Ericksen finds it baffling. He
said he had given Louws numerous attempts to back out of it. Louws
had doubled down instead, so it was only fair to warn
voters.
Surrounded by political aides and a rotating cast of
friends and supporters, Ericksen talked informally about taxes,
less restrictive land use rules, and local personalities and
controversies for about an hour before he excused himself to go to
his daughter’s soccer game. He
didn’t rule out a Louws victory but
Ericksen argued that his more uncompromising appeal
(”I’m not
backing down”) and his political
organization — created during his 12 years as a state
representative and one not-yet-completed term in the state senate
— would give him the edge.
Ericksen pointed out that in Bellingham, Whatcom’s most
populous city where Louws will have to clean up to balance out the
more conservative north county vote, yard signs are pretty scarce
on the ground. That’s anecdote and so is
this, but it’s still impressive: My house
has received hundreds — perhaps thousands — of political
robocalls over the years. Ericksen’s is
the first recorded message from a candidate that left me his
cellphone number in case I had any concerns.
He also argued one reason that Louws may have a hard time
winning the county executive seat is that
he’s too conservative to appeal to
snobbish Bellingham liberals. “Jack is
still Jack,” Ericksen said.
“He’s still pro-life.
He’s still the former mayor of
Lynden,” and that may prove a bridge too
far for many of the voters Louws needs to drive him to
victory.
Ericksen is not a Tea Party candidate, per se. He was
deeply involved in local Republican politics well before Rick
Santelli’s now-famous “rant” launched a
movement. But he shares many of the
movement’s aims, including a culture that
cares more about advancing principles and less about partisanship.
He received the endorsement of the Republican Party, sure, but he
also asked the Dems for their endorsement this June.
According to the Bellingham Herald, one
incredulous Democrat in a room of about 300 shouted,
“He’s a Republican!
What’s he doing
here?” Ericksen quipped.
“I have to admit I
haven’t been to a Democratic meeting in a
while,” and then made the case for common
ground. He didn’t get the endorsement but
he did get “polite applause and a couple
of hisses,” and grudging
respect.
And Ericksen admitted something to me before he took off
for his daughter’s game that must have
given his consultants heartburn. He would like to win the race, he
said, but he’s not sweating it overmuch.
He’ll do his best and hope for the best
and, ultimately, “the greater
good” of the people of Whatcom country
will be much better served with either him or Louws as the next
county exec.
RND | 11.8.11 @ 12:23PM
Mr. Lott, thank you. But shame on American Spectator.
Today is Tuesday November 8, 2011. It is election day.
Sure couldn't tell from the articles American Spectator editors decided to post.
This is why we lose. No focus. No grasp of what is going on. In Ohio. In Mississippi. In Virginia. In Washington State. In Illinois. TODAY! AT THE VOTING STATIONS!
No. We can only focus on 2012.
As if somehow a new president and cabinet change will save the country.
Mr. Lott's article is the ONLY one that even hints at an election today.
Pitiful.
Alan Brooks| 11.8.11 @ 2:35PM
Too much celebrity-culture politics, RND.
When your grandad was in the saddle it wasn't nearly as much about Hollywood, and about fame in general.
TrueBlue| 11.9.11 @ 10:46AM
Since the only things available for me to vote on this year were a few voter initiatives I can understand their disinterest in election day articles (good initiatives, but still, no people to vote for). Since it's different as to what is being voted on not just by state but by county it doesn't make sense to really even attempt the sheer number of articles it'd take to appeal to that wide of an audience.