At this rate, danishes will go the way of the dodo.
You knew it was coming.
First they came for the cigarettes, then Hank Williams Jr. got knocked off Monday Night Football for being politically incorrect, and now they’re coming for the butter.
Denmark, on October 1, put a $1.29 per pound tax on all foods that hit 2.3 percent in saturated fats. That’s on top of a 25 percent surcharge imposed last year by Denmark’s food police on all ice cream, candy, sugar, soft drinks and chocolate.
So now it’s cupcakes being added to Denmark’s targets for hiked taxes, plus bacon, whole milk, shortening, avocados, whipped cream, sausages, sardine oil, nuts, egg yolks, meat drippings, hydrogenated oils, seeds, cheese, dried coconut, cod liver oil and skin-on ducks.
And they’re not even that fat in Denmark. The obesity rate in Denmark is 13.4 percent, lower than the European average of 15.5 percent, and way lower than the obesity rate in United States — 33.8 percent for adults and 17.5 percent for children and adolescents aged 2 through 19, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“Today, more than half the residents of New York City and nearly 40 percent of our public school students are overweight, many of them seriously so,” reports foodnavigator-USA.com.
There’s a Food Director at the Confederation of Industries in Denmark, a central planner named Ole Linnet Juul. Denmark’s across-the-board tax on saturated fat, he said, is the first of its kind in the world.
Ole Juul says the new tax will only add 15 cents to a hamburger. That’s a pretty skinny hamburger. A tax of $1.29 per pound adds 64.5 cents to a good half-pounder, plus whatever tax they stick on the cheese and bun.
What the tax is supposed to do is increase the average life expectancy of the Danes by three years in the next decade, explained Juul. He didn’t get into how longer life spans will add to Denmark’s already burgeoning pension costs, heighten the nation’s already high levels of red ink, and intensify Denmark’s debt crisis. That’s another department.
In any case, the Danes, seemingly more concerned about getting sufficient amounts of butter for their pancakes than living longer, are already stockpiling and talking about some surreptitious smuggling.
“Danes hoarded food before the tax went into effect Saturday, emptying grocery store shelves,” reported ABC News. “Some butter lovers may even resort to stocking up during trips abroad.”
That sounds like Denmark’s central planners might want to get some advice from America’s TSA agents on how to scan underwear for concealed butter sticks.
Romania and Finland are already talking about following Denmark’s lead, according to the Los Angeles Times.
And it’s beginning to sound like we might be next. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that American health care costs due to weight-driven problems went up by $40 billion a year when obesity rates increased from 18 percent to 25 percent from 1998 to 2006.
Some are claiming we can get all that money back and more if we’d just raise taxes on sardines, ducks, sausages, Snickers and all the other bad stuff on the aforementioned lists.
“Conservatively estimated, a 10% tax levied on foods that would be defined as ‘less healthy’ by a national standard adopted recently in Great Britain could yield $240 billion in its first five years and $522 billion over 10 years of implementation,” advised Los Angeles Times health reporter Melissa Healy.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online