AttackWatch, the new Obama campaign site, confirms just how inept and out of touch this president is.
You have to hand it to the Obama administration when it comes to consistency: Its players are singularly skilled when it comes to refusing to learn from their own failures. No, I’m not talking about their cult-like belief in “green jobs” despite a mountain of evidence that those jobs only exist when taxpayers are forced to incinerate money to subsidize them. (Actually, that’s an interesting thought: Could we end up generating more power for the nation if, instead of giving half a billion dollars to a solar panel company, we just burned five hundred million one dollar bills? But I digress…)
And I’m not talking about Obama’s latest stimulus plan. Oops, we can’t say “stimulus” anymore; it’s a “jobs” plan, despite every similar policy of this president having failed spectacularly to produce a job. (Don’t forget, however, to be eternally thankful for “jobs saved.”)
The newest and simultaneously funny and frightening Obama reprise is the launch of an Obama campaign website called AttackWatch.com, designed to “Get the facts (and) Fight the smears.” According to ABC News, “Obama for America national field director Jeremy Bird said the site offers ‘new resources to fight back,’ including policy issue pages that fact check statements by Obama’s Republican opponents with links to ‘evidence’ to back them up.”
Before getting to the early reaction to AttackWatch.com, a little history is in order:
In June, 2008, the Obama campaign launched a website — which you can still see today, although it hasn’t been noticeably updated since the election — called Fight the Smears. (It should be no surprise that the SEIU has a web page with precisely the same title.) It used paid bloggers to do such things as explain to taxpayers that “a recent email smear falsely claims Michelle ordered room service, but she never even stayed at the hotel.” If only Michelle were still so careful with taxpayers’ money!
As could be expected, left-leaning bloggers suggested the site was a success while conservatives said it was a failure. Most likely, the site was preaching to the choir, with little impact on the national debate. Nevertheless, this was the Obama campaign’s last overt web-based propaganda maneuver that could have been considered even close to a success.
On August 4, 2009, in order to counter “disinformation about health insurance reform,” the White House created an e-mail address asking Americans to use it to inform on their friends and neighbors: “If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to email@example.com.”
There was the predictable and justifiable response from civil libertarians and those of us who were around during the Nixon administration wondering whether the administration was collecting names for a new version of an Enemies List. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) called it the “Obama monitoring program” and wrote in a letter to the president, “I can only imagine the level of justifiable outrage had your predecessor asked Americans to forward e-mails critical of his policies to the White House.”
On August 17, 2009, less than two weeks after this e-mail snitching program was announced, and after the White House was further criticized for sending out “spam” e-mails to many Americans, firstname.lastname@example.org was unceremoniously shut down.
Obama’s Director of New Media Macon Phillips, the same gentleman who announced the beginning of the snitch-on-your-neighbor program, noted an “ironic development” from the administration’s propaganda efforts: those efforts themselves “(have) become the target of fear-mongering and online rumors…”
And that brings us to 2011 and the latest example of Obama’s “fatal conceit,” that if something failed in the past it just needs to be done bigger to succeed. And so is unleashed on unsuspecting Americans the AttackWatch.com website as well as a Twitter “hash tag” (#AttackWatch) for the nation’s many “tweeters” to use to report naughty conservatives to the government.
If there has ever been a more spectacular failure of a propaganda campaign in such a short time, I am unaware of it.
It doesn’t help the Administration’s efforts that while Fight the Smears had the look and feel of a campaign website, the new AttackWatch site is a foreboding black and red, looking like something Che Guevara or V.I. Lenin would approve. The site is an unwitting parody of itself.
The pictures on the main page are of Rick Perry (from shoulders upward) and three smaller pictures of the mouths (and only the mouths) of Perry, Mitt Romney, and Glenn Beck. Apparently, the too-clever-for-their-own-good staffers of the Obama campaign think that will focus us on the conservatives’ “lies” and “twist[ing] the facts.” Instead, it’s just uncomfortable and weird.
If Richard Nixon had kept fetish-like photos of the mouths of his “enemies,” his web page would have looked like AttackWatch, though even Nixon probably wouldn’t have used as dark and intimidating a color scheme as Obama has, and that’s saying something.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?